Separate names with a comma.
If Lenire could be approved with just two clinical trials, Auricle could also be approved. It's non-invasive, meaning the clinical trial...
Yes, the science behind the device is solid. The marketing and rollout are problematic. Those are two different things; they don't correlate.
I'm not talking about a loud bar; I'm talking 70-80 dB, which is fine.
From my understanding, it works similarly to residual inhibition. For residual inhibition to work, you don't have to match your tinnitus sound...
Saying that Dr. Shore's device doesn't work, when not only have there been two clinical trials with great results but other studies using bimodal...
We don't know if the participants in the second trial returned to baseline, but they kept improving without using the device, which didn't happen...
It was more fine-tuned since the results remained after the six-week period, whereas in the first clinical trial, tinnitus returned to baseline...
Placebo doesn't reduce tinnitus volume by 10 dB, especially since most people's tinnitus loudness is below 20 dB. That kind of decrease is more...
There is no evidence that you habituate to the device. There is evidence that increasing the treatment duration causes more benefits, as shown in...
The placebo effect doesn't cut your tinnitus by 75% and 11 dB for almost two months. I'm not a tinnitus expert, but that I know. A decrease like...
A placebo effect can't cut your tinnitus in half for months. That's not how it works.
So, I see we have circled back to the skepticism era. I understand it; tinnitus can make everyone pessimistic and bitter. I just want to remind...
Why would EU approval be years away? The FDA is stricter than the EU usually.
Anyone who thinks that a device created by an esteemed Michigan Professor who has been in the field for 30 years is a scam needs to get off these...
It's clear to me that the device will help the majority of patients with somatic tinnitus which again is the majority of tinnitus patients...