@Manny Youre right there. Although we can judge by placebo determined by other experiments like Susan shore, and 19dB reduction on average is nothing to sneeze at, it's still no excuse.
Well nvm. I accidently misinterpreted the data. I thought it said 19 points but it was 9. That sucks but it's still clinically significant. They also gaged a noncompliant group as a substitute for Placebo to some extent, but it's small and definitely no substitute.
@threefirefour Gotcha, I see where it says MML reduced by a mean 9.7 db.
By the way considering as that paper's from 2016 they might have improved the device/stimuli since then.
I presently disagree with your comment about it not being as good as Shore or Uni of MN devices. I don't think we have data that tells us one way or another. I mean, do we have clear data on the efficacy of either the Shore or U of MN devices?
Right, I remember that about the Shore thing. I think I also remember once calculating that that db reduction represented an approximately 50% decrease.
As far as U of MN and Kelpie, yeah! But then there was another dude on here who was in that trial and said it did nothing for him. Those both anecdotal tho anyways ofc.