Search results for query: *

I can sense a little bit of a negativity or worry creeping in here guys. Let’s not forget - this device is the first of its kind to work, with a measured real reduction in loudness, compared to a control group. That’s absolutely massive. And as someone said above, the standard deviation means...

From my understanding all tinnitus is reactive to a certain degree, whether we actively notice it or not. I doubt it would be an exclusion criteria for whether or not the device was to work for you or not. But that’s just my understanding.

I assume FDA approval and preparing for publication is happening simultaneously? Although 1 year sounds about right.

Just knowing this worked and that this might not be the rest of my life gives me so much strength. Obviously there’s still questions left but wow. Can barely believe it.

Do you really think we’ll see the published data in the next week or so before the conference? I have a hard time believing that, as much as I’d love to see it.

This email response of hers only makes me feel even more like help is on the way. Hopefully not much longer now!

The very simple explanation for that is that the device will most definitely not be called the Michigan Tinnitus Device, and that the name isn’t finalised yet, which shows they’re already thinking about distribution.