I read that positive things happen. Not yet understood completely. Stem cells have less damage because of ageing.are they serious? lol
I read that positive things happen. Not yet understood completely. Stem cells have less damage because of ageing.
Perhaps Bram Stoker was not to something?
Honestly, most of the chronic diseases people get happen later in life when people are "old."
The downside is that we now face "old people's ailments", but that's arguably better than being dead.
I understand this is because of unavoidable damage of DNA or RNA in cells. This is why this trial is interesting. To see if less damaged stem cells can "reset" our clocks.You rarely see young people with diseases like cancer, heart disease, arthritis, etc. Perhaps it's because young people are better able to bounce back from injuries.
if this technology ever became affordable to the general public (and not just the .01%), we'd be completely boned. We're already running out of clean air / water / etc.Now the next step is to trick our body into maintaining a young body and not aging. In principle this should be possible.
Aubrey de Grey's first goal is to age "better". What use is it getting older if every day is a struggle. I can understand that.if this technology ever became affordable to the general public (and not just the .01%), we'd be completely boned. We're already running out of clean air / water / etc.
if this technology ever became affordable to the general public (and not just the .01%), we'd be completely boned. We're already running out of clean air / water / etc.