Hi All -
This past weekend my wife and I were in Northern Minnesota spending some time with a couple of friends of ours on the quiet shores of a beautiful lake. We talked about a wide range of things, most having absolutely nothing to do with tinnitus - but since one of them was a tinnitus audiologist (which is how we originally met years ago), the topic did pop up from time to time, particularly with reference to the below ...
There are many ways to classify tinnitus - objective v subjective, loud v soft, high pitched v low pitched, severe v mild, etc. One phrase that came up in our discussion was "clinically relevant bothersome tinnitus." The idea we tossed around was that most people who have tinnitus are not significantly affected by it, but those with clinically relevant bothersome tinnitus are.
So I wonder if any folks on this board would care to offer an opinion on what would constitute clinically relevant bothersome tinnitus.
Thanks -
Dr. Stephen Nagler
This past weekend my wife and I were in Northern Minnesota spending some time with a couple of friends of ours on the quiet shores of a beautiful lake. We talked about a wide range of things, most having absolutely nothing to do with tinnitus - but since one of them was a tinnitus audiologist (which is how we originally met years ago), the topic did pop up from time to time, particularly with reference to the below ...
There are many ways to classify tinnitus - objective v subjective, loud v soft, high pitched v low pitched, severe v mild, etc. One phrase that came up in our discussion was "clinically relevant bothersome tinnitus." The idea we tossed around was that most people who have tinnitus are not significantly affected by it, but those with clinically relevant bothersome tinnitus are.
So I wonder if any folks on this board would care to offer an opinion on what would constitute clinically relevant bothersome tinnitus.
Thanks -
Dr. Stephen Nagler