This is a good one. Contentious though. What's a terrible movie? What if I like it? Am I weird if I think it's terrible but still like it?As I am watching Detective Knight: Rogue, another bad cheezy Bruce Willis "action" movie, it reminds me that Liam Neeson has also been been in a string of mindless "action" movies. Who do you feel is the worst? For me, it's pretty well an even split. Please feel free to disagree if one does so
Of course not. It's a matter of taste & opinions. I'm sure there are many cheezy things I enjoy. It just seems with those two actors for the past several years it has been one mindless movie after another. IMO anyways. I know Bruce is suffering from some kind of chronic condition.This is a good one. Contentious though. What's a terrible movie? What if I like it? Am I weird if I think it's terrible but still like it?
I find Liam Neeson and the acting path he's chosen to go on interesting. This was an actor who used to be in movies like Schindler's List. Now, it's one action, or as you put, mindless movie after another.Of course not. It's a matter of taste & opinions. I'm sure there are many cheezy things I enjoy. It just seems with those two actors for the past several years it has been one mindless movie after another. IMO anyways. I know Bruce is suffering from some kind of chronic condition.
Maybe he's strapped for cash...I find Liam Neeson and the acting path he's chosen to go on interesting. This was an actor who used to be in movies like Schindler's List. Now, it's one action, or as you put, mindless movie after another.
Yeah he was one of those anti-gun folks. Yet there he is in his mindless acting holding guns. Effing eejit.I find Liam Neeson and the acting path he's chosen to go on interesting. This was an actor who used to be in movies like Schindler's List. Now, it's one action, or as you put, mindless movie after another.
Good one bro.Nicholas Cage and John Travolta have followed in similar footsteps: a lot of low budget or direct-to-streaming movies. A lot of them have been panned, but I like most of them, TBH. Cage has chosen better projects than Travolta, IMO. He's still very topical and popular. Travolta is, too, but not as much as Cage. People look forward to Cage's movies. He has Renfield coming up, where he'll play Dracula, and there was a lot of buzz about The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent. He's had movies that were critically praised recently, like Mandy, Pig, and Color Out of Space. He's often the subject of humor, in a good way, for the zany characters he's brought to the screen over the years, almost like a pop culture icon. He's also talked about in superhero circles a lot, jokingly, for his infamous Superman Lives movie that never saw the light of day, but people liked his Ghost Rider.
Travolta hasn't aged as well, with massive bombs like The Fanatic, The Poison Rose, and Gotti. Some of his campier flicks, like Speed Kills, were admittedly bad, but in a good way. I Am Wrath was filmed in my hometown, Columbus, Ohio, and was, again, kind of cheesy, but in a good way. lol A lot of people want Cage and Travolta to reunite for Face/Off 2, but I think it's a bad idea. That was a concept, back then, that required such a suspension of disbelief that it's surprising it became a movie that's remembered fondly; best to just leave it alone, IMO. Cage was talking about his idea for a sequel recently and it sounded even crazier, where it's about the sons or daughters of the original characters, and how they also engage in the "face/off" game like their parents did. It's assumed that the original characters will also return somehow — Cage and Travolta.
Their salaries make them all winners!As I am watching Detective Knight: Rogue, another bad cheezy Bruce Willis "action" movie, it reminds me that Liam Neeson has also been been in a string of mindless "action" movies. Who do you feel is the worst? For me, it's pretty well an even split. Please feel free to disagree if one does so
Sides you can never have... too much cheeze...Their salaries make them all winners!
Cage already looked old a long time ago, and chose really good roles like the one in Leaving Las Vegas. Even movies that today would go straight to TV, like Family Man, were ok, entertaining, and just checked the box office data and that movie did well..Nicholas Cage and John Travolta have followed in similar footsteps: a lot of low budget or direct-to-streaming movies. A lot of them have been panned, but I like most of them, TBH. Cage has chosen better projects than Travolta, IMO. He's still very topical and popular. Travolta is, too, but not as much as Cage. People look forward to Cage's movies. He has Renfield coming up, where he'll play Dracula, and there was a lot of buzz about The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent. He's had movies that were critically praised recently, like Mandy, Pig, and Color Out of Space. He's often the subject of humor, in a good way, for the zany characters he's brought to the screen over the years, almost like a pop culture icon. He's also talked about in superhero circles a lot, jokingly, for his infamous Superman Lives movie that never saw the light of day, but people liked his Ghost Rider.
Travolta hasn't aged as well, with massive bombs like The Fanatic, The Poison Rose, and Gotti. Some of his campier flicks, like Speed Kills, were admittedly bad, but in a good way. I Am Wrath was filmed in my hometown, Columbus, Ohio, and was, again, kind of cheesy, but in a good way. lol A lot of people want Cage and Travolta to reunite for Face/Off 2, but I think it's a bad idea. That was a concept, back then, that required such a suspension of disbelief that it's surprising it became a movie that's remembered fondly; best to just leave it alone, IMO. Cage was talking about his idea for a sequel recently and it sounded even crazier, where it's about the sons or daughters of the original characters, and how they also engage in the "face/off" game like their parents did. It's assumed that the original characters will also return somehow — Cage and Travolta.
This is a good one. Contentious though. What's a terrible movie? What if I like it? Am I weird if I think it's terrible but still like it?
Lol, love it @ZFire.Nick Cage, Steven Seagal, and Bruce Willis are good choices. Gerard Butler and Jean-Claude Van Damme also come to mind as well.
I'm not sure I can agree with Liam Neeson being mentioned here. Dude became a bankable action movie star in his late 50s after Taken (2008). Not many people can achieve this and Taken is a legit good movie despite it being somewhat brainless. The Grey (2011) and Non-Stop (2014) were great too. Not sure what's he been up to lately though.
View attachment 52781
Liam said in an interview that his career took off when these types of 'action" movies were a hit for him. He also admitted that the 50 million he gets for each film is somewhat embarrassing, but hey, a man's gotta eat, right?Maybe he's strapped for cash...
For me the worst "action" movies have to be Seagal's...
I'm watching King of Tulsa. He is old. I think he got divorced again.Nearly all of Sylvester Stallone's movies are awful with the exception of perhaps 2 arguable movies "Night Hawks" and "Rocky". First Blood is so wrong but a good insight into Hollywood and American brainwashing.
I am a huge Mel Brooks fan, I genuinely love him. Mel did make a film called "Love At first Bight", a Dracula spoof, that was absolutely awful.
At least they are known. I remember Bill Maher said a while back "DVDs are for losers." Referring to the male stereotype who collected mindless action movies on DVD when it was a thing. Now just save the files...Liam said in an interview that his career took off when these types of 'action" movies were a hit for him. He also admitted that the 50 million he gets for each film is somewhat embarrassing, but hey, a man's gotta eat, right?
I can't stand him for some reason. I never understood how Hugo Boss chose that guy for its ads.Gerard Butler
What about Colin Farrell's Penguin in the new Batman? Did you see that? I haven't yet, but word is that he's brilliant in the role.I can't stand him for some reason. I never understood how Hugo Boss chose that guy for its ads.
Another actor I don't get is Colin Farrell. It's like he does not transmit anything.
I have to say (admit?), if I was offered millions of dollars each for doing one mindless movie after another, I might just "stoop" a little and do it too! I once saw him in an interview where he actually asked the guy interviewing him, "Can you believe they pay a 60+ year old man "x amount" for doing these (action) movies? He could hardly believe it.Now, it's one action, or as you put, mindless movie after another.
I watched The Batman (2022). He was great as Penguin and one of the best parts of the film. Smoking that cigar like a badass mobster in the Iceberg Lounge. His accent was great.What about Colin Farrell's Penguin in the new Batman? Did you see that? I haven't yet, but word is that he's brilliant in the role.
I haven't seen it. Danny De Vito was amazing at the Penguin role... hard to beat.What about Colin Farrell's Penguin in the new Batman? Did you see that? I haven't yet, but word is that he's brilliant in the role.
Ya, Danny D. was awesome, too. Colin's take is more mobster-like rather than monster-like, as was Danny's. I'm gonna watch it soon.I haven't seen it. Danny De Vito was amazing at the Penguin role... hard to beat.
Colin Farrell was hilarious in In Bruges.I can't stand him for some reason. I never understood how Hugo Boss chose that guy for its ads.
Another actor I don't get is Colin Farrell. It's like he does not transmit anything.
Three quarters of the world are bad actors, the whole world is a stage of fools.Colin Farrell was hilarious in In Bruges.
All William Shatners.Three quarters of the world are bad actors, the whole world is a stage of fools.