There is? I don't think that's true at all.I said the universe is an infinite array of atom configurations.
There are no fairies in the Bible.Because you know it doesn't comport with your fairy book belief system.
There is? I don't think that's true at all.I said the universe is an infinite array of atom configurations.
There are no fairies in the Bible.Because you know it doesn't comport with your fairy book belief system.
Give the bible time. Over the next 2 thousand years, it will include Elon Musk flying to Mars and humans and robots battling for survival.There is? I don't think that's true at all.
There are no fairies in the Bible.
Hey @John Mahan -- I have to say, I find your posts to be quite entertaining! I also grew up on a parochial school, getting regular Bible instruction, and at one point went through "Confirmation". The process involved getting asked questions in front of the entire congregation, and answering important questions about the Bible. Fortunately, we had a chance to practice answering those questions before the big event.
Of course, it was a little nerve wracking for the an eighth grader, but I thought I was prepared. But still hoped I might get asked the easist question I thought there was. And I was! The question: "How do we know the Bible is the true word of God?" Answer: "Becaue the Bible tells us so". How can a person argue with that impeccable logic??? LOL. As a somewhat rebellious eighth grader, I have to say I did manage to answer it with a straight face (no easy task). LOL @Jazzer
I read a story once about the reason why Tesla never created an invention that didn't work the first time around (whether it's true or not I can't say). But the story goes like this: Before Tesla invented a machine in the physical world, he would first invent it inside his own mind. He would then turn it on for a few weeks, and come back and inspect it.
He would note where it was worn in some way, or in any way not working properly. He would then--in his mind--tweak the invention, and give it another go. Eventually, the machine would work properly. Only then would he bring it down to the physical. Kinda makes a person wonder about how we put so much emphasis on the physical, when it would seem it's only the tip of the iceberg of a greater totality of life.
but we don't know that. I see what you're saying that there could be infinite universes therefore everything that can happen, which is anything, will. But that may not be true and you have to accept that as a possibility as well.which can be intersection of billions of universes.
I like Elon Musk.John won't like Musk playing God, I can assure you.
Yes we do. Because life without God proves it. Life couldn't happen without almost infinite permutations.but we don't know that. I see what you're saying that there could be infinite universes therefore everything that can happen, which is anything, will. But that may not be true and you have to accept that as a possibility as well.
You're saying, if there isn't a God, then life couldn't happen without infinite permutations, therefore since life does exist there must be infinite permutations and no God.Life couldn't happen without almost infinite permutations.
No. I believe what Hawking believes. He believes the existence of God is optional and therefore unlikely.You're saying, if there isn't a God, then life couldn't happen without infinite permutations, therefore since life does exist there must be infinite permutations and no God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning
What makes Hawking "one of the greatest minds of our time"? Because he expounded on a bunch of unprovable theories about black holes? What type of tangible benefit did mankind derive from his work?To repeat, two of the greatest minds of our lifetime don't believe that God existed.
With the tooth fairy, Santa, or Easter Bunny, we already know they do not exist since it is a parent or another adult providing the cash, gifts, or eggs. There is proof that they do not exist.Its ok to believe in God, just like it isn't a bad thing for little kids to believe in the tooth fairy and Santa.
What is that book he is reading?
Debating Hawking's intellect really?...most preeminent astrophysicist of our time who helped perpetuate our understanding of the universe on the backs of Newton and Einstein.What makes Hawking "one of the greatest minds of our time"? Because he expounded on a bunch of unprovable theories about black holes? What type of tangible benefit did mankind derive from his work?
I posted it in the reply.I don't know, as I can't really make it out. Can you, and if so, could you let us know.
OK, but I'm still not clear on your point.Here it is again. -- https://archive.org/details/theoryofnaturalp00boscrich/page/n6
In what multiverse are you from where chimps are "also known as" cavemen?chimpanzee aka caveman
He obviously chose that book for that photograph to show us that he regards it as important. Maybe you should read it.OK, but I'm still not clear on your point.
If God really did create man, then comparing Hawking's intellect to God's would be like comparing an ant to a human.Debating Hawking's intellect really?
Maybe you should read it.
Not blurry at all.Well it's a bit blurry, and it's over 500 pages. I'd be happy with a synopsis if you have one.
Tesla's perception of the universe
I was just throwing it out there for you since you obviously regard him as an important person.
Well, that's part of the beauty of Christianity is that we are commanded not to think of ourselves as superior to others. It actually teaches that we are helpless without God and not better than anyone else.On a somewhat related topic, if there's one thing I wished about the world's major religions, it's that they wouldn't think of themselves as superior.
A good question and one I presume you are asking in earnest. Our flesh does of course. But there is a lot of evidence on earth that suggests our souls are recycled. There is copious evidence of reincarnation throughout the world...@John Mahan, are you just going to turn into compost when you are dead?
Just remember, because I have been waiting for the bible thumpers to slowly make an appearance, keep in mind, those that believe in the bible are more chimp than modern man. Please know that evolution is a sliding scale and not all people have benefited as much.
A good question and one I presume you are asking in earnest. Our flesh does of course. But there is a lot of evidence on earth that suggests our souls are recycled. There is copious evidence of reincarnation throughout the world...
A couple of examples...and hundreds just like it:
Then there is unexplained precosity....little kids like the video I posted of the little girl that feels a connection to Mozart. The only plausible explanation for such talent is bringing it along from a previous life.
And then there is a bit more about near death experiences. People that die for a while and feel their body die and their spirit rise out of their body and travel toward a light.
Perhaps the most famous account is from a Harvard taught neuroscientist Dr. Even Alexander:
Dr. Alexander's story:
Prior to his NBE, he believed a brain was like a CPU of home computer. Organic matter and circuits that created individual thought. He believed consciousness was singular and personal and not shared.
After his near death experience all that changed. He believes that the spirit on some level rejoins the spiritual collective which may go on to inhabit another life as explained in the preceding videos.
This of course has nothing to do with a God...or perhaps a concept of God...Jesus or the Bible or traditional interpretation of religion.
Dr. Alexander believes there is a super intelligence like the cloud related to AI or a computer. People with their particular brain anatomy have the ability to tap into this intelligence and make sense of it. He calls the brain a reducing valve or more like a radio receiver. Our brain differences explain our different talents including a savant with extreme mental impairment with almost supernatural islands of cognitive ability. Like Rex Lewis:
A definitional thing. This spiritual collective consciousness could be termed God, but didn't necessarily create mankind or all the animals that are almost just like us that seem to have a soul as well...that may too tap into collective consciousness on a reduced level. Dolphins, horses, dogs and cats come to mind.So you believe in the soul, and reincarnation, but not God. You also assume that people that believe in the Bible are of lesser intelligence and less "evolved". Hmm alrighty then.
that seem to have a soul as well...that may too tap into collective consciousness on a reduced level. Dolphins, horses, dogs and cats come to mind.
Honestly, Hawking's book with Mlodinov was embarrassing and this was recognized by scientists and philosophers alike. Hawking did some good work on black hole radiation but his work on imaginary time has become dated. We should all admire him for how he contributed to science through his terrible illness but his scientific importance has been exaggerated. He has done outstanding work and has become an ambassador to science, sure, but some people even called him the greatest physicist of his generation which is ridiculous. Also, the multiverse and landscape in string theory has turned as non-scientific as it gets. To put it bluntly it replaces "God did it" with "the multiverse did it". The multiverse remains untestable as a scientific hypothesis. The jury is out on whether it is a huge violation of Occam's razor (entities or laws?). See also the review of Krauss book "a universe from nothing" in the NYT (David Albert is an atheist with two PhD's, one in quantum physics). I know, I put too much stuff in one post and should explain better how all these points are connected but don't have time to elaborate these days. Do read David Albert piece on Krauss universe from "nothing"/multiverse approach in the NYT though, it is just brilliant.Debating Hawking's intellect really?...most preeminent astrophysicist of our time who helped perpetuate our understanding of the universe on the backs of Newton and Einstein.
These conversations really never go so well. The reason so many don't agree is based upon our training and our training really stems from how our brains are wired to begin with. No free will.
Anybody who believes that modern man didn't spawn from chimpanzee aka caveman 7 million years ago..which is just such a fundamental, to me denies truth and is pretty much worthless to argue with.
Best to leave it there.
Great post. Agree that some of the respect for Hawkings was his will to fight through his profound illness and continue to use his great mind to think about the universe. But speaking of dated, look how far we have come from the period of Einstein and drilling down on any of the greatest thinkers from Einstein who competed with the greatest thinkers in his day like his Mathematics counterpart for a transcendent theory, same applies to Edison and Tesla when Edison was dead wrong to push DC as you know and did everything in his power to politically discredit the genius Tesla.Honestly, Hawking's book with Mlodinov was embarrassing and this was recognized by scientists and philosophers alike. Hawking did some good work on black hole radiation but his work on imaginary time has become dated. We should all admire him for how he contributed to science through his terrible illness but his scientific importance has been exaggerated. He has done outstanding work and has become an ambassador to science, sure, but some people even called him the greatest physicist of his generation which is ridiculous. Also, the multiverse and landscape in string theory has turned as non-scientific as it gets. To put it bluntly it replaces "God did it" with "the multiverse did it". The multiverse remains untestable as a scientific hypothesis. The jury is out on whether it is a huge violation of Occam's razor (entities or laws?). See also the review of Krauss book "a universe from nothing" in the NYT (David Albert is an atheist with two PhD's, one in quantum physics). I know, I put too much stuff in one post and should explain better how all these points are connected but don't have time to elaborate these days. Do read David Albert piece on Krauss universe from "nothing"/multiverse approach in the NYT though, it is just brilliant.