• We have updated Tinnitus Talk.

    If you come across any issues, please use our contact form to get in touch.

Autifony Therapeutics Phase II Study for AUT00063, for the Treatment of Hearing Loss and Tinnitus

As we await our first TT member to be accepted into the AUT00063 trial (good luck @2131e if it is you), I stumbled across an older article that may be of interest to those on this thread.

No, it isn't on new developments, promising research, or optimism from a neurologist - sorry.

Rather, I think this article (http://www.thelondontinnitustreatme...s-drug-research-news-now-with-added-spin.html) is a good example of (yet another) unique challenge T-sufferers have to deal with - tinnitus specialists who don't quite seem to "get it".

The article was written in 2013 by Jason Levy - an "Audiologist, Certified Tinnitus Practitioner, HCPC Registered Hearing Aid Dispenser and CNHC Registered Hypnotherapist". The article was written around the same time that AUT00063 was entering Phase 1 trials.

Although Levy makes a glib statement of encouragement - "Great, I thought. There'll soon be a cure for this horrible, debilitating condition," the majority of the article is spent either fostering fear that AUT63 will have terrible side effects or arguing that there are already "many effective treatments" (he offers hearings aids, mindfulness, and hypnotherapy as effective treatments).

I am willing to accept that those without T and those who do not work with T-sufferers may not understand how debilitating, maddening, and life-crushing T can be.

However, I have more difficulty with T-professionals (who are supposedly on our side) who seem to be satisfied with status-quo treatments (which are woefully short of offering genuine symptom reduction)…and those who would rather instill fear of the first ever targeted drug treatment for T!

Yes, I understand that AUT63 may not be as effective as we hope and that it may have side effects. But seriously, should this be our approach to discovering new treatments for medical conditions? If we already have something that "kind of, sort of helps some people" and new treatments could be scary…then we shouldn't bother? This is not how medical breakthroughs and more effective treatments arise.

I realize that the author may only be playing devil's advocate and may be intending to keep us T-sufferers grounded in reality. But frankly, T does an excellent job all by itself keeping me grounded.

And wouldn't it be refreshing to (just once) hear from an audiologist or ENT who allows him or herself to be just a bit excited about the possibility a game-changing treatment for T?

Rant over. Stay positive everyone!

if autifony will succeed in his second trial, many of hearing compagnies go out of business

stop making the walk crochs ? please
 
@tomm and @ChrisC I'm so glad to hear I'm not the only one plugging up down there religiously. This city really is louder than Australia - on my main street an ambulance/police car goes by about every 10 minutes so I've taken to plugging whenever I leave the house!

@James White thanks for clearing up the confusion - definitely a wombat. Sadly not mine.

I've been offered an initial appointment at the Birmingham clinic (still waiting on hearing back from the London clinic). It will not be til mid Feb and I would need to pass (well, fail : ) as per their requirements ) the hearing test. I'm pretty sure I'm a bit deaf from years of clubbing but I'm not sure I'll be deaf enough. Let's hope so. Of course I'll keep everyone updated.

@preslys I am an Australian but I'm on a student visa and with NHS - as long as you're on NHS and you're here for long enough you're ok I think
 
I believe my T is caused due high temperature water entering my left ear. Therefore my inner middle ear may have physical damage, though I don't know. Should I assume that since the damage to my ear is possibly physical that drug treatments like AUT00063 would be ineffective since they target the brain?
 
I believe my T is caused due high temperature water entering my left ear. Therefore my inner middle ear may have physical damage, though I don't know. Should I assume that since the damage to my ear is possibly physical that drug treatments like AUT00063 would be ineffective since they target the brain?
The idea is that it should lower the intensity and volume regardless of cause
 
UCL came back to me.

UK people can call Nottingham for a telephone pre-screening, prior to a GP referral and proper screening.

As far as I can tell, Nottingham can screen you for all UK sites and then tell you who to contact closest to you.

Call 0115 823 2600
between 1000 and 1500.

Ask to register for a telephone screening for the QUIET-1 trial.
 
Confirmation of the hearing loss requirement.

"The trial requires a participant to have an average hearing loss of 20-60db across the frequencies between 250Hz and 4000Hz."

If your audiogram is perfect at those low frequencies, you'll have to hold on.
 
Confirmation of the hearing loss requirement.

"The trial requires a participant to have an average hearing loss of 20-60db across the frequencies between 250Hz and 4000Hz."

If your audiogram is perfect at those low frequencies, you'll have to hold on.

well that rules me out then for autifony cos mine only shows a hearing loss at 8Hz...and that is if it is accurate cos i have had two hearing tests with different results
 
Confirmation of the hearing loss requirement.

"The trial requires a participant to have an average hearing loss of 20-60db across the frequencies between 250Hz and 4000Hz."

If your audiogram is perfect at those low frequencies, you'll have to hold on.


i thought this was an average though. so as long as you have losses in the higher frequencies high enough to average it to 20dB, you are good.

also wanted to point out that it is possible to game your audiogram :whistle:
 
I'm on the trial 22 nd of Jan
must be the prayers
God bless

Awesome! I hope nothing but the best for you. From the Phase I trial, it sounds like the side effects were pretty mild, so hopefully it will be an easy process. Please update us when you can as we will all be looking forward to hearing about it!
 
I've now got my initial screening appointment confirmed for Monday 12th January. I don't think it is likely that I will meet the hearing loss requirement even though I have some hearing loss in the higher frequencies. My hearing in mid-range frequencies is about normal for my age and I'm pretty sure that I don't have have an average hearing loss of 20-60db between 250Hz and 4000Hz. Therefore, I'm thinking that I probably won't get on to the trial but it's still worth a try.
 
I've now got my initial screening appointment confirmed for Monday 12th January. I don't think it is likely that I will meet the hearing loss requirement even though I have some hearing loss in the higher frequencies. My hearing in mid-range frequencies is about normal for my age and I'm pretty sure that I don't have have an average hearing loss of 20-60db between 250Hz and 4000Hz. Therefore, I'm thinking that I probably won't get on to the trial but it's still worth a try.
Before tinnitus, I thought my wife and daughter had really good hearing and I was normal. My hearing went down a bit with the event that gave me tinnitus, but not that much, and it turns out I would qualify with flying colors. Hearing, like silence, is relative, so you never know without testing.

@Shaun Yay!
 
This article was posted in another thread but it mentions Autifony:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/b...ted-attract-drug-makers-attention-.html?&_r=1

"Autifony Therapeutics is conducting early trials of a daily pill aimed not at hair cells but at helping the brain better interpret signals from the auditory nerve."

Now they mention "daily pill". How can we interpret this? Does this indicate that drug will be something you would have to take everyday for a lifetime?
 
@Shaun and @PhilB great news. hope you both get the active treatment.

in case it is of interest to anyone i've attached the participant info sheet i got sent from autifony. hopefully you can read it. i'm eligible to come in for a screening appointment, here's hoping my hearing is worse than i thought : )

i didn't realise that half of participants get placebo - so just a head's up for anyone who didn't realise that either. if you get the placebo, you don't get active treatment afterwards
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0365.JPG
    DSC_0365.JPG
    447.3 KB · Views: 126
  • DSC_0366.JPG
    DSC_0366.JPG
    475.7 KB · Views: 121
  • DSC_0367.JPG
    DSC_0367.JPG
    501.3 KB · Views: 123
  • DSC_0368.JPG
    DSC_0368.JPG
    496.3 KB · Views: 120
  • DSC_0369.JPG
    DSC_0369.JPG
    488.7 KB · Views: 119
i am an australian but i'm currently on a scholarship in london

@2131e
Take that Wombat of yours and see if you can get on the trial then. I think you qualify as long as you are a resident there? I'm not sure though.
 
@Shaun and @PhilB great news. hope you both get the active treatment.

in case it is of interest to anyone i've attached the participant info sheet i got sent from autifony. hopefully you can read it. i'm eligible to come in for a screening appointment, here's hoping my hearing is worse than i thought : )

i didn't realise that half of participants get placebo - so just a head's up for anyone who didn't realise that either. if you get the placebo, you don't get active treatment afterwards
I really hope you get in!
 
Now they mention "daily pill". How can we interpret this? Does this indicate that drug will be something you would have to take everyday for a lifetime?

I wouldn't take too much notice of that, usually article writers have a habit of not reporting word for word and sometimes inserting their own interpretation of it.
Autofony have stated that they believe it will be a course and not a lifetime dose!
 
I wouldn't take too much notice of that, usually article writers have a habit of not reporting word for word and sometimes inserting their own interpretation of it.
Autofony have stated that they believe it will be a course and not a lifetime dose!
@RichL just curious where did you get that info from?
 
Because they tested the mice months after administering the initial treatment and Tinnitus had not returned!
I don't recall reading this, Rich, can you point it out?

To anybody who has not had experience with this: taking a pill everyday is no big deal. I took Propecia for a decade to hold on to my hair (which, after 10 months off Propecia, has not gone anywhere...go figure) and the biggest hassle was swinging by the pharmacy once a month. Which was no hassle at all. Now! I realize the main question on everybody's minds is, will health insurance cover it? I don't see why not. Propecia was on me, since hair is not a medical necessity, but a tinnitus treatment/cure? It would be criminal - by which I mean we should bring a class action lawsuit - if companies denied that benefit. This from the guy who got health insurance coverage for Potiga. I love my health insurance.
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now