Cortical Surface Plasticity Promotes Map Remodeling and Alleviates Tinnitus in Adult Mice

Nick47

Member
Author
Podcast Patron
Benefactor
Ambassador
Advocate
Jun 16, 2022
2,135
UK
Tinnitus Since
2015
Cause of Tinnitus
Viral/noise
Animal study on electrical activation of the cortex after hearing loss induced tinnitus.
Abstract said:
These findings suggest that cortical surface activation can be used to facilitate practical functional recovery from phantom percepts induced by sensory deprivation. They also provide a working principle for various treatment methods that involve electrical rehabilitation of the cortex.
Cortical Surface Plasticity Promotes Map Remodeling and Alleviates Tinnitus in Adult Mice
 
How are they determining whether the mice have tinnitus? If they're using either behavioral tests or acoustic startle reflex to define the presence of tinnitus, then this study doesn't do much for me I'm afraid.
 
2.7. Conditioned active-avoidance task as a behavioral measure of tinnitus
A conditioning-based task comprising a modified version of an active avoidance task reported previously (Miyakawa et al., 2019) was used to monitor tinnitus-associated behaviors. A two-compartment shuttle box was separated by a barrier with a narrow open door. The shuttle box was equipped with an electrical grid floor connected to a shock generator. During the active-avoidance training period (1–2 weeks), the mice learned to associate passing through the doorway with sound. Nine sounds were chosen at random from the following stimulus set: five pure tones (4, 8, 16, 20, and 32 kHz) and four octave-band noises (4–8, 8–16, 10–20, and 16–32 kHz), played at three intensities each (40, 50, and 60 dB). Each trial began with a holding period of 5–40 s, during which a mouse stayed on one side of the two-compartment shuttle box. At the end of the holding period, a sound was played. If the mouse passed through the doorway within 8 s of sound onset, a new trial was automatically initiated. If the mouse failed to pass through the doorway within the time window, a mild foot shock (0.2 mA for 0.5 s) was delivered once every 7 s until it passed through the doorway. When a mouse achieved a 70 % success rate – successful passing through the doorway within 8 s of sound onset, it was transferred to a testing session. The average number of times that a mouse passed through the doorway during silent probe trials for 3 days represented the likelihood that the mouse was experiencing tinnitus. After the training and last testing phases, two additional testing phases were performed 10 days after the mice received unilateral noise trauma and 10 days after cortical surface stimulation via the graphene electrode array.
As expected.

C9D66965-0A42-4396-8D53-4E2C8C194937.gif


I can't wait till the day arrives when we can objectively diagnose and detect tinnitus (with great reliability) in both human and animals without having to resort to subjective and unreliable self-reports and behavioral tests to assess tinnitus and potential solutions. Because right now, there is no outcome measure that is reliably applicable to both human and animal studies in a way that gives us consistent results, nor is there a way to establish a consistent benchmark for comparison between the two.
Where do we go to get this done? I'll hold 'em up to do it.
There's no reason to automatically assume that it will undoubtedly work on humans.
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now