Friends, I have received an e-mail notification regarding the above post (#15). I have ATEOS on "Ignore," but have taken him off in order to see the post about which I was notified.
OK. Point by point.
When I turned 65 this past December, I retired from the corporate world. My intention was to fill my time with travel, reading, and my hobbies - photography and music. But after a couple of weeks I decided to start seeing a few tinnitus patients. (I guess full-time retirement just isn't for me!) Anyway, I accept one new patient a week 38-40 weeks a year - mostly from across the US, but some from abroad. That comes to an average of just over three new patients a month, which in anybody's book is "a few." This week's patient is coming from Southern California. I spend an average of four to five hours with every new patient - usually over two consecutive days.
I do not understand how ATEOS could possibly take exception to my words:
"I am retired. I do see a few tinnitus patients a month from across the globe because I am very very good at what I do, and there is a lot of suffering out there."
... because those words are 100% accurate.
I started out subletting space in an office across town one day a week (actually two half-days a week). This week I move to a new location, subletting space from an ENT practice just ten minutes from my home - again two half-days a week. Other than the sublet arrangement, I have no financial connection with that practice or any of the ENTs or audiologists there. We do plan to closely collaborate on occasion. When they have a challenging tinnitus patient, they will ask me for my thoughts on the case. There is no additional charge to the patient for my input. It is what colleagues do for each other in the best interests of their patients. If a patient comes to me with an audiogram I don't understand, one of their audiologists will help me out - again at no charge to the patient. Same thing if I have a question for their ENTs about a report or the significance of a scan. I get no "cut" from any testing that their audiologists might do. Just like I get no cut from the testing any of the other audiologists in town or across the US might do. I get no cut from any mark-up or any profits from the sale of devices, regardless of where those devices are purchased. Patients can get tested or purchase devices (when indicated) wherever they choose. Next month their tinnitus audiologist will be giving a presentation to the Atlanta Tinnitus Support Group. I plan to go over her slides with her. I guess that sort of thing falls under the umbrella of collaboration - and I am only too happy to help her prepare. But I am not getting paid for doing so. The ENT group is using my name in their promotions because my clinic is located in their office, and I suppose it is a draw for them. But I am not part of their practice, nor do I see their tinnitus patients as my own. They have their own tinnitus audiologist for that. The sublease arrangement enables me to keep my overhead low, and since all my profits (save for my $1 annual draw) go to research towards a cure for tinnitus, it seems to me that that's a good thing! Plus I get to collaborate with some pretty wonderful people. It's a Win-Win.
ATEOS's recent postings have saddened me greatly. Early on I helped Neuromonics design some studies for clinical trials and addressed their board twice about various aspects of habituation. But that was more than a decade ago, way before any of their products went to market. I have had nothing whatsoever to do with the company since 2004 and most assuredly never profited from the sale of any of their devices.
I do not like it when ATEOS impugns my integrity.
I am putting ATEOS back on "Ignore" and will never again acknowledge him.
Dr. Stephen Nagler