I'm sorry for taking so long.
@Lex
I don't know why you show me that article. Do you think the article is related to your earlobes issue?
I read the article you mentioned two years ago. Fuchs identified the type II neurons some years ago. Then, he wanted to make his discovering meaningful, and associate it to disorders or symptoms without a known etiology in the scientific literature. But this type of neurons remains intact when hair cells die, and he can't explain what is important, that is: what is changed in people with "sound-induced" pain, or how this nerve cells became more sensitive. So the relationship between this type II afferents and pain is remote (or inexistent). Also, he can't explain why symptoms change all the time, or why sufferers get better, or have setbacks, or recover completely, or why certain sounds with rapid attack are more problematic, or why almost all of them have tensed or moving tensor tympanis, and sometimes other tensions or abnormalities around the TTs, or headaches, nausea, or an accentuated startle reflex, or why some of them are depressed or obsessed (and before their ear problems), and a lot of things more. Fuchs is just pushing a conclusion to make his microscopic discovery meaningful, without understanding the problem in a real and intimate manner. The same happened with "hidden hearing loss".
Liberman and Fuchs (and the whole cochleocentric troupe) are technicians, and they could be good for looking through a microscope, or for provoking acoustic shocks to rats in a fish tank, like the US government does in Guantanamo and other CIA prisons. But definitely they are not good for reaching conclusions, because they don't know what they are talking about.
It is not by chance that Pollard likes these researchers, when he wrote four newsletters without a single mentioning to the tensor tympani, like playing a football match without ball (How could Messi score three goals in a game without a bloody ball?) Pollard doesn't understand the problem, and he is interested in raising money for experiments, when he doesn't need any money, at least not before he tries to think properly.
In my opinion, you won't find an answer to your questions in the cochleocentric troupe.
This is not what you told me in the other thread, some months ago, that you have a random pain even in silence. You wrote "I feel a sharp, stabbing pain inside my ears, usually on the right, but my left ear gets that, too. It happens randomly, even when I'm in a quiet place and haven't been exposed to sounds." And in this very thread, you wrote: "The pain now is there almost 24/7, even in silence." So it is not clear. How is this?
Interesting views! So what do you think, after reading articles etc that causes hyperacusis? What would be the part of hearing damaged to then trigger hyperacusis, the hearing nerve, the inner ear, middle ear...?