Yes. All signs point to them having a real winner on their hands.https://www.frequencytx.com/news-events/news-events-press-release-07-23-2019.php
So this is another 62 million dollar? It was only one week ago that they made this deal with Astellas.
I haven't got a clue when it comes to things finance, but this is good news, is it not?
From such a small trial with non-publicly released results/outcome? I obviously don't understand what's behind but doesn't make a sense as they completed phase of trial with such a low number of participants. (Of course I hope I'm wrong and they and their investors that might be acknowledged with results already sees another breakthrough).Yes. All signs point to them having a real winner on their hands.
They also have robust in vitro and in vivo evidence that the drug regrows the hair cells and that they reconnect and restore hearing function.From such a small trial with non-publicly released results/outcome? I obviously don't understand what's behind but doesn't make a sense as they completed phase of trial with such a low number of participants. (Of course I hope I'm wrong and they and their investors that might be acknowledged with results already sees another breakthrough).
From such a small trial with non-publicly released results/outcome? I obviously don't understand what's behind but doesn't make a sense as they completed phase of trial with such a low number of participants. (Of course I hope I'm wrong and they and their investors that might be acknowledged with results already sees another breakthrough).
Well, it'd still make sense if you were totally deaf, otherwise I wouldn't risk such an invasive procedure xDThe technique to deliver that gene therapy is absurd. They surgically remove the eardrum, drill a hole in the cochlea with a laser and then inject the reprogrammed virus into the hole in the cochlea and then reattach the ear drum. Then the virus injects the stem cells in the cochlea with ATOH1.
@JohnAdams I forgot your opinion. What are the chances that hair cell regrowth will reduce or eliminate tinnitus? Of course we'll wait and see, am just curious.They also have robust in vitro and in vivo evidence that the drug regrows the hair cells and that they reconnect and restore hearing function.
I don't think the supporting cells would get hurt from cochlear damage like sound, as they do not react to it like hair cells do. It's like skin cells being able to be damaged by those levels of sound. And yes, those cells should be able to restore any frequency so long as they are hair cells.Does anyone know if the loss of hair cells cause damage to the supporting cells?
FX-322 use supporting cells but if someone's supporting cells get hurt, it means nonsense?
And it seems like there are different types of hair cells since they sense different frequencies, so FX-322 could regenerate various types of hair cells?
They can still get damaged from pathogens or ototoxic medications though. Sound however indeed wouldn't damage those.I don't think the supporting cells would get hurt from cochlear damage like sound, as they do not react to it like hair cells do. It's like skin cells being able to be damaged by those levels of sound. And yes, those cells should be able to restore any frequency so long as they are hair cells.
Perhaps that's how they came up with their name...
So do you think that FX-322 would not be able to regrow hair cells, where they have been damaged by virus or ototoxic medications?They can still get damaged from pathogens or ototoxic medications though. Sound however indeed wouldn't damage those.
I already mentioned the hyperlink, if you are interested in it you can read it: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637947/Does anyone know if the loss of hair cells cause damage to the supporting cells?
FX-322 use supporting cells but if someone's supporting cells get hurt, it means nonsense?
And it seems like there are different types of hair cells since they sense different frequencies, so FX-322 could regenerate various types of hair cells?
I don't know, it would take clinical trials to find out.So do you think that FX-322 would not be able to regrow hair cells, where they have been damaged by virus or ototoxic medications?
It's probable that they can be regrown, unless pillar and phalangeal cells are destroyed.So do you think that FX-322 would not be able to regrow hair cells, where they have been damaged by virus or ototoxic medications?
That's sad. So when FX-322 comes, we all have some flat epithelium that may decrease the effect.The flat epithelium only takes 1 week to be formed from your body after damage.
Well, if the loss of hair cells is what has caused your tinnitus then I think it will help. If there is damage to nerves in other parts of the system that is causing hyperactivity then I don't see how this could work unless there is some kind of healing cascade effect.I forgot your opinion. What are the chances that hair cell regrowth will reduce or eliminate tinnitus?
That depends on the individual situation of the cochlea after the damage - not everyone has severe to profound hearing loss. We have to wait until we know more and get some data from the trial. Maybe the power of the human body itself can solve some problems when FX-322 starts the sequence in the supporting cells like the miracle that nerves connect to the regrown hair cells etc. We also don't know anything about the quality (hearing) of regrown hair cells. I think the flat epithelium is only mentioned in connection with severe to profound hearing loss.That's sad. So when FX-322 comes, we all have some flat epithelium that may decrease the effect.
"allowed to put hope into this approach"That depends on the individual situation of the cochlea after the damage - not everyone has severe to profound hearing loss. We have to wait until we know more and get some data from the trial. Maybe the power of the human body itself can solve some problems when FX-322 starts the sequence in the supporting cells like the miracle that nerves connect to the regrown hair cells etc. We also don't know anything about the quality (hearing) of regrown hair cells. I think the flat epithelium is only mentioned in connection with severe to profound hearing loss.
My personal opinion is that we are allowed to put hope into this approach. The idea behind FX-322 is great and the investments and co-operations also look very very promising.
In the 2nd diagram, what year was this created? Where is the literature you pulled this from?It's probable that they can be regrown, unless pillar and phalangeal cells are destroyed.
View attachment 31127
On the other hand I found a view where proliferation of supporting cells also happens.
View attachment 31128
Hearing aids apparently help reduce tinnitus in some people, judging from what I've read around the web and heard from my audiologist and ENT.Have we got any evidence that restoring hearing will reduce tinnitus? Why then hearing aids don't help?
Hearing aids reduce tinnitus by acting like maskers.Hearing aids apparently help reduce tinnitus in some people, judging from what I've read around the web and heard from my audiologist and ENT.
I have a coworker whose use of hearing aids stopped his tinnitus, even when he's not using them.Hearing aids reduce tinnitus by acting like maskers.
That's amazing.I have a coworker whose use of hearing aids stopped his tinnitus, even when he's not using them.
Were the hearing aids simply providing amplification or were they programmed a certain way to help tinnitus? (supposedly).I have a coworker whose use of hearing aids stopped his tinnitus, even when he's not using them.
I have a coworker whose use of hearing aids stopped his tinnitus, even when he's not using them.
Are you sure that's what's happening?the brain isn't sending the compensatory transmissions that started when the ear got shut down in the first place.
they are?everyone's ears and brains are different
This is a bit off topic but it would be great to get similar imaging as above done on your own hearing hair cells.I wonder if FX-322 doesn't damage the order of the hair cells. Playing with notch signaling can lead to unexpected proliferation of hair cells. Anyone know something about this?
B - acceptable? What do you think?
View attachment 31125
View attachment 31126
A - No treatment
B - Atoh1 over-expression
C - g-secretase inhibitor in the Notch signal pathway
D - Atoh1 over-expression + g-secretase inhibitor