How so?Your arguments/positions are just all over the place. Respectfully.
How so?Your arguments/positions are just all over the place. Respectfully.
I see similarities to when the first airplane was invented. A lot of failures were endured at first until it finally worked. The same will happen with FX-322 and every new invention.I agree with you that they will eventually figure it out. Henry Ford failed twice before founding Ford Motor Company and being successful. Many people fail before they succeed. There will be a treatment, the question is when.
I agree that more R&D money should be spent but I think people have too much of a romantic and triumphalist Tony Stark notion of the intersection of money and invention. You know, the way Tony Stark just pulls himself up by his bootstraps, hits the woodshed, has this almost religious epiphany and "solves" time-travel in Endgame?if you don't try, you'll never find out what is and isn't possible
If only it was that easyI agree that more R&D money should be spent but I think people have too much of a romantic and triumphalist Tony Stark notion of the intersection of money and invention.
I agree with this. I've pretty much said this before at some point.When I see people say "if only (insert rich person) threw money at the problem we'd have a cure already" all I see is this delusion at work and all it does is make you bitter and angry, like somehow we're all effectively entitled to miracles.
Vaccine development is a long complex process. It usually takes 10 to 15 years. We did it in one. If there was an urgency and the world banded together, we could have something in a year, just like the COVID-19 vaccine we have now.Re: funding:
I'm really confused by the insinuation that we should laugh at the notion of funding tinnitus and hyperacusis research more. Like sure, funding alone doesn't lead to medical breakthroughs, but it's a very important prerequisite.
Ask yourself this, and obviously this is a totally different medical problem: If COVID-19 wasn't a global pandemic that set the world on fire, would we have a bunch of vaccines being distributed right now? Let's say the global reaction to it was similar to tinnitus and hyperacusis -- that the people dying on ventilators are overprotecting their lungs and hearts and that they needed CBT to just get over it.
Would we, today, be in a position of climbing out of it? Absolutely not.
I am certainly not drawing an apples to apples comparison here, but it's completely dishonest to believe that we are on the verge of maxing out tinnitus and hyperacusis funding and urgency. Yes, there is a point where they do max out and a cure or treatment still takes time.
Also, the same people who are saying that funding will be a magical fix are the people who won't accept scientific incremental change. In short, it's funny to want more research funding, but Will McLean is supposed to sit in his basement, bypass all intermediate scientific steps and jump right out with perfect audiograms.
I'm just so confused. Scientists are laughably underpaid. Consider this: I interned at a consulting firm many years ago. They couldn't be bothered to give me any work so I basically got paid $25 per hour to do nothing. I literally brought books to work to teach myself how to program with no one caring what I was doing.
In contrast, according to payscale, the average chemist gets paid $52,280 per year. We are currently so so far away from this world of rich, elite, over-paid scientists that don't do anything. It's the opposite, actually. It's a bunch of grown-ups kicking and screaming, blaming the wrong people, while they patiently keep working for the betterment of mankind.
I would also add that I'm really confused that we still believe that regenerating the ear is impossible. Like I get that we can't claim we are there yet, but jeeze, there is so much revolutionary science already. What are most of us complaining about? Timeline. Everyone who follows the science knows it will eventually work. What better way to push the timeline up a few years than urgency and funding? I don't get it. It's a problem made for more funding. If we look at the pipeline that I gathered, there are many, many drugs that would greatly benefit from a jolt of energy.Vaccine development is a long complex process. It usually takes 10 to 15 years. We did it in one. If there was an urgency and the world banded together, we could have something in a year, just like the COVID-19 vaccine we have now.
I disagree with some of the comments... Money makes the world go round. If I had a billion dollars under my management, and I was allowed to spend it, we'd have something in a year. I could run many trials simultaneously. I could hire scientists for $50k a year. I would collaborate with scientists across the world. I could put 20 scientists on each team, run 100 experiments at a time, each looking into every avenue of tinnitus and hearing loss.
I might not have a cure but I'd have something... and it probably wouldn't be FDA approved, but you could come to my house and get it.
I think most tinnitus sufferers (outside of this forum where the worst cases meet) would rather have the world band together for effective treatments for things like cancer, Parkinson's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease, Alzheimer's...If there was an urgency and the world banded together, we could have something in a year, just like the COVID-19 vaccine we have now.
You make some good points. People are moved by some combination of two things. Numbers and severity. The severity factor is just not understood. It's a flow chart that leads back to depression, as if it's not a separate disease.I think most tinnitus sufferers (outside of this forum where the worst cases meet) would rather have the world band together for effective treatments for things like cancer, Parkinson's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease, Alzheimer's...
My point is that it's naive to think tinnitus would ever be considered urgent in that manner. Good example is Elon Musk, his partner and the mother of his child, Grimes, has tinnitus. She tweeted some years ago how she had to cancel concerts because of her ear issues. Elon has not mentioned tinnitus once on his Twitter account. That's the importance and urgency tinnitus has for the world's richest man.
So what we have left is scraps and the hope that future hearing loss treatments help tinnitus...
Urgency and funding aren't the full picture imo.I think most tinnitus sufferers (outside of this forum where the worst cases meet) would rather have the world band together for effective treatments for things like cancer, Parkinson's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease, Alzheimer's...
My point is that it's naive to think tinnitus would ever be considered urgent in that manner. Good example is Elon Musk, his partner and the mother of his child, Grimes, has tinnitus. She tweeted some years ago how she had to cancel concerts because of her ear issues. Elon has not mentioned tinnitus once on his Twitter account. That's the importance and urgency tinnitus has for the world's richest man.
So what we have left is scraps and the hope that future hearing loss treatments help tinnitus...
I would never laugh at the idea of funding tinnitus and/or hyperacusis research. It's the total opposite in my case. I've spent years trying to get more people interested in the idea of funding research, but it's next to impossible. The vast majority are not the slightest bit interested, and this has always surprised me. It's the same with spreading awareness: it's extremely difficult to find anyone who will come forward, and I think the two go hand-in-hand. Better awareness equals a higher chance of receiving money. People need to see more of the ugly side of this condition.I'm really confused by the insinuation that we should laugh at the notion of funding tinnitus and hyperacusis research more. Like sure, funding alone doesn't lead to medical breakthroughs, but it's a very important prerequisite.
There's not enough meaningful awareness for enough people to care. I would love for this to happen to the tinnitus community, but we have to be realistic, we are competing with many other awful conditions that are after the same money. We had a petition last year to try and get more government money, and it was hard work getting those signatures. We finally reached our goal and then the coronavirus hit. We have shit luck all the time.Ask yourself this, and obviously this is a totally different medical problem: If COVID-19 wasn't a global pandemic that set the world on fire, would we have a bunch of vaccines being distributed right now? Let's say the global reaction to it was similar to tinnitus and hyperacusis -- that the people dying on ventilators are overprotecting their lungs and hearts and that they needed CBT to just get over it.
I've keenly followed the scientific developments within this field for many years, and I've never expected to see big advancements out of nowhere. We all know that science is a slow and tedious process of trial and error. My frustration was with how the management handled everything. I think Frequency Therapeutics need to be held accountable and deserve more criticism. Don't forget that they went public.Also, the same people who are saying that funding will be a magical fix are the people who won't accept scientific incremental change. In short, it's funny to want more research funding, but Will McLean is supposed to sit in his basement, bypass all intermediate scientific steps and jump right out with perfect audiograms.
This is very true! But it's the way of the world. Do footballers deserve millions for kicking a ball around? It's crazy to think about, but some of the most meaningful and contributing members of society are also some of the most shit upon people out there. In this country, we tend to knight millionaire celebrities who are living the dream, and that's about their only contribution to the world (not in all cases, obviously). Some of the most deserving people go unnoticed whilst doing work that saves lives and helps our civilisation in ways that others would probably never comprehend.I'm just so confused. Scientists are laughably underpaid. Consider this: I interned at a consulting firm many years ago. They couldn't be bothered to give me any work so I basically got paid $25 per hour to do nothing. I literally brought books to work to teach myself how to program with no one caring what I was doing.
It doesn't help at all that debilitating hearing disorders are imperceptible to anyone but the sufferer. "Invisible illness."You make some good points. People are moved by some combination of two things. Numbers and severity. The severity factor is just not understood. It's a flow chart that leads back to depression, as if it's not a separate disease.
The numbers are there, but they are camouflaged by a lot of mild cases. I'll be honest, before getting them, I didn't even know severe tinnitus was a thing and I didn't even know what hyperacusis was at all. I didn't even know that was even possible.
Something is wrong here. There are other rare diseases that we have heard of. The difference is largely dependent on whether we view them as debilitating outright or debilitating from our reaction to them, or whatever the fuck that lose-lose situation means.
Exactly. It will work, it's been proven to work in a lab, the rest is figuring out dosage and application schedules, reformulation, better delivery, better vehicle. It's all there, they just have to put it together.I would also add that I'm really confused that we still believe that regenerating the ear is impossible. Like I get that we can't claim we are there yet, but jeeze, there is so much revolutionary science already. What are most of us complaining about? Timeline. Everyone who follows the science knows it will eventually work.
I agree with almost everything you've said. I really wish there was a good way to get more funding. I know Tinnitus Talk does a lot. On my end, I wish there was a way to do this beyond virtue signaling. I hate to say this, but characters like Jastreboff and Julian Cowan Hill (whose opinion is cited regarding COVID-19 vaccine tinnitus lmao) could use their voice for so much more. I don't see eye to eye with Joyce Cohen perfectly, but I respect the fight and plain honesty that she shows over the fact that these problems are not psychological, but ear damage.I would never laugh at the idea of funding tinnitus and/or hyperacusis research. It's the total opposite in my case. I've spent years trying to get more people interested in the idea of funding research, but it's next to impossible. The vast majority are not the slightest bit interested, and this has always surprised me. It's the same with spreading awareness: it's extremely difficult to find anyone who will come forward, and I think the two go hand-in-hand. Better awareness equals a higher chance of receiving money. People need to see more of the ugly side of this condition.
I can see where Glenn is coming from because over the years there have been countless posts of people wishing death, and all kinds of misery, upon billionaires, thinking that that will lead to an immediate cure. The activism from such individuals is almost always non-existent as well. It gets a tad annoying, in my opinion.
There's not enough meaningful awareness for enough people to care. I would love for this to happen to the tinnitus community, but we have to be realistic, we are competing with many other awful conditions that are after the same money. We had a petition last year to try and get more government money, and it was hard work getting those signatures. We finally reached our goal and then the coronavirus hit. We have shit luck all the time.
I've keenly followed the scientific developments within this field for many years, and I've never expected to see big advancements out of nowhere. We all know that science is a slow and tedious process of trial and error. My frustration was with how the management handled everything. I think Frequency Therapeutics need to be held accountable and deserve more criticism. Don't forget that they went public.
This is very true! But it's the way of the world. Do footballers deserve millions for kicking a ball around? It's crazy to think about, but some of the most meaningful and contributing members of society are also some of the most shit upon people out there. In this country, we tend to knight millionaire celebrities who are living the dream, and that's about their only contribution to the world (not in all cases, obviously). Some of the most deserving people go unnoticed whilst doing work that saves lives and helps our civilisation in ways that others would probably never comprehend.
At least I still have eyes to roll when anyone tells me "it can't be that bad" since I "look fine."It doesn't help at all that debilitating hearing disorders are imperceptible to anyone but the sufferer. "Invisible illness."
Who exactly in this thread is laughing at the idea of funding research more?I'm really confused by the insinuation that we should laugh at the notion of funding tinnitus and hyperacusis research more.
Yes, Elon Musk, the guy Tony Stark was modeled off of. And look at the progress of things he HAS worked on. For instance, we have a handful of road fatalities that he and Tesla have somehow avoided responsibility for due to autopilot not being ready for prime-time and his mythical fleet of robotaxis still far off his self-stated ETAs. His bulletproof glass on the Cybertruck broke (twice) in his shambolic reveal. Bumpers falling off his cars in the rain, glass shattering due to shearing forces, displays blinking off or blaring music at full volume due to faulty touchscreens. He can't even get the paint shop to paint cars well enough to avoid chronic chipping and scratches on final delivered cars. SpaceX is faring better but at present Starship prototype after Starship prototype is blowing up. All along the way the stock of Tesla goes to the moon because people these days are literally living in fantasyland and they need some place to park their money because interest rates are at zero. But the problems I listed out illustrates the difference between fantasy geniuses and real-life figures who are just as much Trumpian boast and BS as the real thing.Good example is Elon Musk
Maybe it's the nature of communicating online, but I just find the Tony Stark reference as kind of condescending. I don't think billionaires are victims because we want their money to go towards science.Who exactly in this thread is laughing at the idea of funding research more?
What we're pushing back on is the idea that if we just unload the Brinks truck that tinnitus will be solved tomorrow. This is magical thinking on the part of those who are suffering so much that they feel they can't wait to see how things pan out and there's kind of looking for someone rich to blame for not snapping his fingers and making it happen yesterday.
Geez someone doesn't like Elon.Yes, Elon Musk, the guy Tony Stark was modeled off of. And look at the progress of things he HAS worked on. For instance, we have a handful of road fatalities that he and Tesla have somehow avoided responsibility for due to autopilot not being ready for prime-time and his mythical fleet of robotaxis still far off his self-stated ETAs. His bulletproof glass on the Cybertruck broke (twice) in his shambolic reveal. Bumpers falling off his cars in the rain, glass shattering due to shearing forces, displays blinking off or blaring music at full volume due to faulty touchscreens. He can't even get the paint shop to paint cars well enough to avoid chronic chipping and scratches on final delivered cars. SpaceX is faring better but at present Starship prototype after Starship prototype is blowing up. All along the way the stock of Tesla goes to the moon because people these days are literally living in fantasyland and they need some place to park their money because interest rates are at zero. But the problems I listed out illustrates the difference between fantasy geniuses and real-life figures who are just as much Trumpian boast and BS as the real thing.
This sounds like common car industry flaws stuff to me, not Elon Musk / Tesla-specific problems. And honestly, they're not all that bad, all things considered. Anyone remember when a major manufacturer had to recall all of their cars because of floor mats? Or how about ignition cylinders failing, locking the steering wheel, and killing their occupants? Or 3rd brake lights melting causing battery explosions? I've also seen my share of bad paint from the factory... don't get me started on Land Rover.Bumpers falling off his cars in the rain, glass shattering due to shearing forces, displays blinking off or blaring music at full volume due to faulty touchscreens. He can't even get the paint shop to paint cars well enough to avoid chronic chipping and scratches on final delivered cars.
Easier said than done. Really, this is arguing over belief-systems. I'm not going to stop you from thinking money is magic anymore than you'll concede that some challenges are intractable.I might not have a cure but I'd have something...
Chopping out parts of your body and rendering yourself deaf isn't really a solution befitting the 21st century, not unless we have high quality bionic implants at least.My point was however there must be a point within the brain where nerves terminates...
If you're speaking of both ears being the price to pay, then the self-chosen sounds of silence would wreak one into eventual severe depression with no recourse.Many of those with severe debilitating tinnitus would forsake hearing in one or both ears at the chance to get rid of their tinnitus in a heartbeat.
*Hearing loss and tinnitus drugs in trial pipeline*It's an option and one that is more probable. A cure for tinnitus and hearing loss is light years away. No one on this forum will ever see or experience it.
It's not an option, though. How does making people deaf improve the situation? I can't imagine anything worse, to be honest. Severe tinnitus with deafness thrown in is not a good mix at all as you will have removed the only asset that can help one camouflage the noise. Not to mention that you'd never hear your loved ones' voices again or anything else for that matter. I don't think you realise how horrible it can be to lose your hearing.It's an option and one that is more probable. A cure for tinnitus and hearing loss is light years away. No one on this forum will ever see or experience it.