koffee_monster
Member
@Nobody19, @Diesel, @Padraigh Griffin (in no particular order),
It was not my intention to start a personal discussion here. I was inquiring if perhaps @Padraigh Griffin had certain information giving him a negative outlook on the FX-XYZ trials that I was unaware of.
I also pointed out some glaring issues with Potassium regulators and Trobalt in particular as a continuous treatment.
@Padraigh Griffin replied with the valid argument that my sources were pointing to Trobalt and not really Potassium regulators in general and that the FX-XYZ lineup has indeed been somewhat less performant than some of us would have expected at this point (I don't have an opinion on this, I try to look at research in the most objective way I can).
Some issues of Trobalt will most likely be part of the XEN side-effects too, but hopefully, it will indeed be to a lesser degree.
Both approaches still seem very valid to me and I do not at all have the feeling that one approach should cancel out the other. They can perfectly coexist and may even amplify each other's effect on tinnitus.
Tinnitus research is fragile as-is, let's not create in-fighting in the people that actively try to follow the research space.
Let us not break down other people's hopes and ideas about upcoming treatments as for many (including me) the built-up expectations for treatments is what makes having tinnitus a lot more bearable.
Even if those expectations aren't always correct or justified, they help people cope, push through and research the matter further. There's no point in attacking those expectations only for the sake of attacking them. If a person would be in danger because of misinformation that's another story.
I hope this conversation can continue in a polite fashion and that we can focus on the objective research part of this thread.
It was not my intention to start a personal discussion here. I was inquiring if perhaps @Padraigh Griffin had certain information giving him a negative outlook on the FX-XYZ trials that I was unaware of.
I also pointed out some glaring issues with Potassium regulators and Trobalt in particular as a continuous treatment.
@Padraigh Griffin replied with the valid argument that my sources were pointing to Trobalt and not really Potassium regulators in general and that the FX-XYZ lineup has indeed been somewhat less performant than some of us would have expected at this point (I don't have an opinion on this, I try to look at research in the most objective way I can).
Some issues of Trobalt will most likely be part of the XEN side-effects too, but hopefully, it will indeed be to a lesser degree.
Both approaches still seem very valid to me and I do not at all have the feeling that one approach should cancel out the other. They can perfectly coexist and may even amplify each other's effect on tinnitus.
Tinnitus research is fragile as-is, let's not create in-fighting in the people that actively try to follow the research space.
Let us not break down other people's hopes and ideas about upcoming treatments as for many (including me) the built-up expectations for treatments is what makes having tinnitus a lot more bearable.
Even if those expectations aren't always correct or justified, they help people cope, push through and research the matter further. There's no point in attacking those expectations only for the sake of attacking them. If a person would be in danger because of misinformation that's another story.
I hope this conversation can continue in a polite fashion and that we can focus on the objective research part of this thread.