They can't. What would be cool though is now that they know it is safe, to just go ahead and let us have it, out of pocket and let us be the efficacy trial. I want it. At least I think I do.They should let the people in the trial talk.
Give people some kind of damn HOPE.
https://www.livescience.com/55830-sea-anemone-proteins-could-fix-damaged-hearing.html++++Scary Question Time++++
So there are outer hair cells that amplify the sound and inner hair cells that actually transmit the sound to the brain??
There's also hair cell death, as well as hair cell damage.
So if you take that into account, there are 3 states for each set:
No damage, damage, and death.
So inner cells and out cells could have any of these 3 states, which would result in a 3 x 3 = 9 sets of situations.
Terms:
IHC = inner hair cell
OHC = outer hair cell
ND = no damage
DM = damage
DT = death
HA = hyperacusis
HL = hearing loss
T = tinnitus
IHC-ND + OHC-ND = Healthy hearing
IHC-ND + OHC-DM = HL and/or HA?
IHC-ND + OHC-DT = only HL?
IHC-DM + OHC-ND = T and/or HA?
IHC-DM + OHC-DM = T and HA?
IHC-DM + OHC-DT = T + HL?
IHC-DT + all OHC conditions = T + HL?
Now my question is this: what is going to be the effect of FX-322 on each of these different conditions? Will regenerated hair cells replace merely damaged ones? Can a situation exist where there are only dead hair cells and no damages ones?
I'm starting to think this is a far greater problem than simply the activation of progenitor cells.
What think you?
Hit with a good question, but that's upon a researcher from Frequency or Decibel etc... to answer up.++++Scary Question Time++++
So there are outer hair cells that amplify the sound and inner hair cells that actually transmit the sound to the brain??
There's also hair cell death, as well as hair cell damage.
So if you take that into account, there are 3 states for each set:
No damage, damage, and death.
So inner cells and out cells could have any of these 3 states, which would result in a 3 x 3 = 9 sets of situations.
Terms:
IHC = inner hair cell
OHC = outer hair cell
ND = no damage
DM = damage
DT = death
HA = hyperacusis
HL = hearing loss
T = tinnitus
IHC-ND + OHC-ND = Healthy hearing
IHC-ND + OHC-DM = HL and/or HA?
IHC-ND + OHC-DT = only HL?
IHC-DM + OHC-ND = T and/or HA?
IHC-DM + OHC-DM = T and HA?
IHC-DM + OHC-DT = T + HL?
IHC-DT + all OHC conditions = T + HL?
Now my question is this: what is going to be the effect of FX-322 on each of these different conditions? Will regenerated hair cells replace merely damaged ones? Can a situation exist where there are only dead hair cells and no damages ones?
I'm starting to think this is a far greater problem than simply the activation of progenitor cells.
What think you?
++++Scary Question Time++++
So there are outer hair cells that amplify the sound and inner hair cells that actually transmit the sound to the brain??
There's also hair cell death, as well as hair cell damage.
So if you take that into account, there are 3 states for each set:
No damage, damage, and death.
So inner cells and out cells could have any of these 3 states, which would result in a 3 x 3 = 9 sets of situations.
Terms:
IHC = inner hair cell
OHC = outer hair cell
ND = no damage
DM = damage
DT = death
HA = hyperacusis
HL = hearing loss
T = tinnitus
IHC-ND + OHC-ND = Healthy hearing
IHC-ND + OHC-DM = HL and/or HA?
IHC-ND + OHC-DT = only HL?
IHC-DM + OHC-ND = T and/or HA?
IHC-DM + OHC-DM = T and HA?
IHC-DM + OHC-DT = T + HL?
IHC-DT + all OHC conditions = T + HL?
Now my question is this: what is going to be the effect of FX-322 on each of these different conditions? Will regenerated hair cells replace merely damaged ones? Can a situation exist where there are only dead hair cells and no damages ones?
I'm starting to think this is a far greater problem than simply the activation of progenitor cells.
What think you?
I think there's a great chance you're right.I always wonder... progenitor cells regrow hair cells, right? Wouldn't it be easier (or only possible) to regrow hair cells in places where they are dead and withered? If there is still a hair cell present (even though it's damaged)... it will not just be replaced.
So many unknown factors.
Just send a mail Jeff Karp`s way to see if he answers.I always wonder... progenitor cells regrow hair cells, right? Wouldn't it be easier (or only possible) to regrow hair cells in places where they are dead and withered? If there is still a hair cell present (even though it's damaged)... it will not just be replaced.
So many unknown factors.
I always wonder... progenitor cells regrow hair cells, right? Wouldn't it be easier (or only possible) to regrow hair cells in places where they are dead and withered? If there is still a hair cell present (even though it's damaged)... it will not just be replaced.
From my research, I think there are different levels of certain proteins in supporting cells of the dead hair cells and the healthy hair cells. I don't think the drug will cause hair cells to grow where they already exist.I think to identify where hair cells died and to create a drug that can identify it is even more trickier. I think we are too far away from that.
How do you know this? I want a professional to answer this question.From my research, I think there are different levels of certain proteins in supporting cells of the dead hair cells and the healthy hair cells. I don't think the drug will cause hair cells to grow where they already exist.
I said "I think" not "I know". Also it looks like they know how to repair synapses.How do you know this? I want a professional to answer this question.
So lemme guess my de-nerved hair cells still count as hair cells even though they lost the majority of their ribbon synapses?
Remember hair cells are more durable and it's the ribbon synapses that go first making them basically work half ass with speech in background noise or things people enjoy like music.
FML.
Dude if there was only one dose of the cure I would gladly let you have it over me. I'm sorry you're suffering man.How do you know this? I want a professional to answer this question.
So lemme guess my de-nerved hair cells still count as hair cells even though they lost the majority of their ribbon synapses?
Remember hair cells are more durable and it's the ribbon synapses that go first making them basically work half ass with speech in background noise or things people enjoy like music.
FML.
Since when? Go back a couple of pages and look for the video I linked to. It's as up-to-date as you'll find.Any updates?
That's what Donald Trump approved, right?Seriously major question:
If FX-322 is safe, and some of us are on the edge of a suicidal cliff (I'm very thankful to not be there, but empathize deeply with those who are) then what good reason is there to not go ahead and let those deeply troubled tinnitus sufferers go ahead and at least try it when this trial concludes in December?
What is more important than helping these poor souls ASAP?
This study was done in 2007. I can imagine we have come a long way in 10 years on this and this is what Frequency Therapeutics has been ironing out the details on the last few years in testing all the different drug combinations.https://www.healthyhearing.com/report/47482-Hearing-loss-cure-
"However, the mice's supporting cells spontaneously "migrated to the hair cell region and began growing hair bundles on their surfaces," the researchers reported. Still, hearing was not restored, but a later study offered more hope."
My thoughts exactly. I doubt they'd be focusing on a method that does not produce the right cells in the right places.This study was done in 2007. I can imagine we have come a long way in 10 years on this and this is what Frequency Therapeutics has been ironing out the details on the last few years in testing all the different drug combinations.
Yes they have since restored hearing in mice.This study was done in 2007. I can imagine we have come a long way in 10 years on this and this is what Frequency Therapeutics has been ironing out the details on the last few years in testing all the different drug combinations.
Probably not.Is it worth looking up the regrowth of synapses to try and figure out what approaches Frequency Therapeutics might take or any other companies aiming to do the same thing?
I think the main challenge is confirming the functionality of the newly grown hair cells.I think the main challenge isn't growing the hair cells in the right place. The main challenge is to deliver the drug into the right place. I might be wrong.
Phase 2 will start next year and by the end of 2019 end we should see the results of that.I wish someone who had an injection would let us know how it's going. The suspense is killing me. And if the drug does work, how long will we have to wait for the next phase?
The drug will diffuse into the cochlea and mix with the fluid in there. They tested the concentration levels, over time, and it was successful in phase l. I don´t think this is the problem.I think the main challenge isn't growing the hair cells in the right place. The main challenge is to deliver the drug into the right place. I might be wrong.
From http://www.hearingreview.com/2018/10/university-rochester-researchers-regrow-sensory-hair-cells/Is it worth looking up the regrowth of synapses to try and figure out what approaches Frequency Therapeutics might take or any other companies aiming to do the same thing?
6-9 months.I wish someone who had an injection would let us know how it's going. The suspense is killing me. And if the drug does work, how long will we have to wait for the next phase?