• This Saturday, November 16, you have the chance to ask Tinnitus Quest anything.

    The entire Executive Board, including Dr. Dirk de Ridder and Dr. Hamid Djalilian are taking part.

    The event takes place 7 AM Pacific, 9 AM Central, 10 AM Eastern, 3 PM UK (GMT).

    ➡️ Read More & Register!

Frequency Therapeutics — Hearing Loss Regeneration

Oh, God: So I'm going to continue reading about neuromodulation or wait for a second miracle.

My long-term hope is that Frequency Therapeutics or Decibel Therapeutics has a viable treatment within 5 to 10 years. For now, my sights are set on neuromodulation. MuteButton 2 is as close as 2019 or '20. I'll fly to Ireland if I have to. So there are very promising things that we can do very soon. Don't give up.
 
My long-term hope is that Frequency Therapeutics or Decibel Therapeutics has a viable treatment within 5 to 10 years. For now, my sights are set on neuromodulation. MuteButton 2 is as close as 2019 or '20. I'll fly to Ireland if I have to. So there are very promising things that we can do very soon. Don't give up.
Yep. Nothing new to what was discussed at the BTA Conference. Looking at a January launch in Ireland. Rolling out to the UK after that. Applying for FDA approval for the US
You can book the ticket now then. Big question is regarding efficacy though.

Regarding the 5 to 10 year timeline, breakthrough drugs average 4.8 according to the link below. 17% of approved drugs have been classed as "breakthrough", so its not something "unique" that happens once i a thousand years.

FX-322 started some 1.5 years ago, so IF it works I think we can actually reasonably expect it in maybe 3 years. (It is a breakthrough if it works).

"The study, from researchers with the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA, found that breakthrough drugs reported the shortest development time at 4.8 years — a rate 32% shorter than fast-track drugs."

https://www.mdmag.com/medical-news/need-for-speed-the-effects-of-an-expedited-fda-approval-process
 
My long-term hope is that Frequency Therapeutics or Decibel Therapeutics has a viable treatment within 5 to 10 years. For now, my sights are set on neuromodulation. MuteButton 2 is as close as 2019 or '20. I'll fly to Ireland if I have to. So there are very promising things that we can do very soon. Don't give up.
Dear Lord pleeeaaase be right.
 
My long-term hope is that Frequency Therapeutics or Decibel Therapeutics has a viable treatment within 5 to 10 years. For now, my sights are set on neuromodulation. MuteButton 2 is as close as 2019 or '20. I'll fly to Ireland if I have to. So there are very promising things that we can do very soon. Don't give up.
That's a long time for a drug that's going to be in phase 2 in a couple of months. 5 years is even high. Drugs that move quickly it's normally a 5-year thing if they have a new phase of the study every 18 months. Their first in human study was less than a year ago I believe and they are already on a 1.5 phase and planning phase 2. This is moving really fast. All the other drugs I'm waiting come out haven't had clinical data posted in 2-3 years which is normal. This drug has the potential to cure other things other than hearing loss. This is barely a drug and basically just a jump start to a normal biological function. Almost every drug that's ever been produced had a side effect and this one has not... because it's not really a drug.

Frequency Therapeutics could take over the pharmaceutical industry and change the way we think about medicine. Hearing loss is just the beginning for them. I mean they grew hair on bald mice faster than minoxidil can. I see them curing hearing loss, then hair loss, and then possibly move on to the next big challenge, the brain and nervous system.
 
You can book the ticket now then. Big question is regarding efficacy though.

Regarding the 5 to 10 year timeline, breakthrough drugs average 4.8 according to the link below. 17% of approved drugs have been classed as "breakthrough", so its not something "unique" that happens once i a thousand years.

FX-322 started some 1.5 years ago, so IF it works I think we can actually reasonably expect it in maybe 3 years. (It is a breakthrough if it works).

"The study, from researchers with the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA, found that breakthrough drugs reported the shortest development time at 4.8 years — a rate 32% shorter than fast-track drugs."

https://www.mdmag.com/medical-news/need-for-speed-the-effects-of-an-expedited-fda-approval-process
Lol I've been saying this and literally just wrote it. People are loooking up the wrong statistics, Frequency Therapeutics is rolling through the clinical phases. The drug is going to cure a lot of other illnesses. This guy's thinking 5-10 years for the drug to come out and I'm thinking the company will have changed its name entirely by then to Immortal Therapeutics.
 
Hearing loss is just the beginning for them. I mean they grew hair on bald mice faster than minoxidil can. I see them curing hearing loss, then hair loss, and then possibly move on to the next big challenge, the brain and nervous system.
It sounds very optimistic. I hope you're right.

I talked to my partner about this treatment and he looked at me like saying "that's going to be 100 years from now". People are not empathic sometimes...

Regarding the problem of baldness: I already damaged my hormones by taking finasteride. My hair is still intact after 16 months of stopping treatment (post finasteride syndrome??). And I can "work" but my libido is not the same. It will be hard for me to see that there is a non-dangerous alternative.
 
Part of the reason these things take so long is because time needs to be spent waiting for long term side effects.

Medications that appear to be safe in the short term may cause undesirable effects later. This seems to be a give it once and you're done kind of med. I think that helps here, but any regulatory body is going to have to watch for potential unwanted effects. That takes time, no way around it.

Sixteen people have been given this medication during this current trial. Those numbers are going to have to ramp up drastically before they convince anybody to rush.
 
I know it's been reported to have regrown hair cells in a donor human cochlea. I don't doubt that at all. Do those hair cells function properly? I have yet to read that it's restored hearing or improved tinnitus in an alive human. These seem like huge biological research hurdles to make.
 
What an exciting time to be a bald man with hearing loss and tinnitus :rockingbanana:
The hearing loss cure legitimizes curing hair loss which is going to make them billions on top of the billions they make from hearing loss. Have you not watched the videos where they talk about all the applications they are researching? They made it sound like they are testing the drug on a few diseases. It's a pretty easy concept to understand. They have a stem cell/progenitors cell activator.
 
Part of the reason these things take so long is because time needs to be spent waiting for long term side effects.

Medications that appear to be safe in the short term may cause undesirable effects later. This seems to be a give it once and you're done kind of med. I think that helps here, but any regulatory body is going to have to watch for potential unwanted effects. That takes time, no way around it.

Sixteen people have been given this medication during this current trial. Those numbers are going to have to ramp up drastically before they convince anybody to rush.
Those drugs that cause long term side effects are from chronic use. This drug leaves the body in a couple of days. Now Decibel's gene therapy is different because that's going to permanently change you... not something I'm interested in. Frequency's just emulates what happens when you're in the womb and leaves the body in a couple of days. They also don't keep track of the study participants after the study is over. They would just have a longer study. It's just not how it works. Once the study is over they don't really care or keep track of you. But just because you are no longer getting dosed doesn't mean the study is over. A study could last a year or more but it doesn't sound like that's something they're going to do. Most of the time they do that to monitor people that have diseases that are chronic and can kill you. I worked at Parexel for a year when I first got out of college... I know how this stuff works bud.
 
I know it's been reported to have regrown hair cells in a donor human cochlea. I don't doubt that at all. Do those hair cells function properly? I have yet to read that it's restored hearing or improved tinnitus in an alive human. These seem like huge biological research hurdles to make.
It's worked on mice and regrown hair cells in human donated hair cells. They know it restored hearing in the mice because they responded to sound when before they didn't. You haven't read if it works on humans because the information hasn't been posted yet and won't till the start of next year. So maybe December, January, February.
 
Part of the reason these things take so long is because time needs to be spent waiting for long term side effects.

Medications that appear to be safe in the short term may cause undesirable effects later. This seems to be a give it once and you're done kind of med. I think that helps here, but any regulatory body is going to have to watch for potential unwanted effects. That takes time, no way around it.

Sixteen people have been given this medication during this current trial. Those numbers are going to have to ramp up drastically before they convince anybody to rush.
The large scale trials don't start till phase 2-3. They have a process to this and if you're curious about it you should read up on the criteria for the different phases. 1. Safety 2. Efficiency 3. Large scale efficiency. And that's it and the drug goes to the FDA. The FDA approval isn't what takes time, it's the the time it takes to study the effects of the drug and by the way they are pumping out studies, the drug will be out in 3-5 years depending on how long it's at the FDA.
 
I know it's been reported to have regrown hair cells in a donor human cochlea. I don't doubt that at all. Do those hair cells function properly? I have yet to read that it's restored hearing or improved tinnitus in an alive human. These seem like huge biological research hurdles to make.
That's what they are literally testing right now. It functions in mice so the assumption is that it will work in humans. Why it was so important to John. He wanted to know so badly and he got a little carried away.
 
My long-term hope is that Frequency Therapeutics or Decibel Therapeutics has a viable treatment within 5 to 10 years.
I realize safety and side effects may take years to determine but will we at least know soon whether or not FX-322 is growing cochlear hair cells in humans? Or will these results be kept private until much later?
 
Those drugs that cause long term side effects are from chronic use. This drug leaves the body in a couple of days. Now Decibel's gene therapy is different because that's going to permanently change you... not something I'm interested in. Frequency's just emulates what happens when you're in the womb and leaves the body in a couple of days. They also don't keep track of the study participants after the study is over. They would just have a longer study. It's just not how it works. Once the study is over they don't really care or keep track of you. But just because you are no longer getting dosed doesn't mean the study is over. A study could last a year or more but it doesn't sound like that's something they're going to do. Most of the time they do that to monitor people that have diseases that are chronic and can kill you. I worked at Parexel for a year when I first got out of college... I know how this stuff works bud.
We won't truly know the long-term effects of FX-322 until we have data that extends beyond phase III if it gets that far. It's interesting to note that tinnitus is listed as a treatment-emergent concern, and this is likely due to the delivery method.

To assess the incidence of adverse safety events (vertigo, tinnitus, perforation) including severe adverse events.

It says they will follow candidates for two weeks, however, this does not confirm its safety. The longer it's on the market, the more we will learn about it, as there is no substitute for real world data across a large population. It's all about mitigating risk.
 
We won't truly know the long-term effects of FX-322 until we have data that extends beyond phase III if it gets that far. It's interesting to note that tinnitus is listed as a treatment-emergent concern, and this is likely due to the delivery method.

To assess the incidence of adverse safety events (vertigo, tinnitus, perforation) including severe adverse events.

It says they will follow candidates for two weeks, however, this does not confirm its safety. The longer it's on the market, the more we will learn about it, as there is no substitute for real world data across a large population. It's all about mitigating risk.
Yeah the drug will already be out by then. You can't keep track of those people for 5 years after they've been given the drug. It doesn't happen in studies like this. They also don't study for long term effects bud. That's something that they figure out while the drugs been out. I think a lot of you guys are making false assumptions. And I think people are assuming this could possibly cause cancer.
 
It's all about mitigating risk.

Yes. It's not just the FDA putting up barriers. There's a right way and a wrong way of doing things and I'd say the people who run Frequency Therapeutics know the difference. By doing it the right way, they get to maintain their reputations and coincidentally they don't get their arses sued because they didn't do due diligence.

I still think that what risks there may be will be to the ear only and if there are side effects they will become apparent earlier rather than later. As @Deathtotinni said, the drug is only in the ear for a short time. But yeah, it's all just speculation.
 
Yeah the drug will already be out by then.
Exactly. That's what I'm saying. Even when drugs are released to market, the risks and side-effects are still not fully understood. We can learn far more about the real-world effects of a drug when there is data covering a broad demographic. In fact, it's sometimes the case that drugs get pulled after release for precisely this reason.

We have no idea what the long term ramifications are for activating inner ear progenitor cells. This is something that will take time to observe. I'm hopeful that there will be nothing serious to report and that it will ultimately prove to be efficacious.

Yes. It's not just the FDA putting up barriers. There's a right way and a wrong way of doing things and I'd say the people who run Frequency Therapeutics know the difference. By doing it the right way, they get to maintain their reputations and coincidentally they don't get their arses sued because they didn't do due diligence.
I agree. Frequency Therapeutics will want to get this right and will not cut corners. We can only speculate about what the outcomes to the trials might be, but I am cautiously optimistic. If they can get fast-track status after phase II (if it gets to this stage) it could bring the timescale down to around five years or so.
 
If it is safe and works, I don't see why it would take 5-10 years to be released to the public. I can't believe I have to keep repeating this, but by December, they will know if the drug works. Long term side effects can't be measured unless you follow up over several years.

So if the drugs improve hearing and there are no known side effects, why would the FDA not fast track its release?
 
"Novartis' imatinib (Gleevec) for CML -- Phase 1 trials began in June 1998, drug was approved 3 years later in May 2001 (FDA granted fast track and priority review; FDA review was a record 2.5 months)"

https://www.quora.com/What-have-been-the-fastest-FDA-drug-approvals-starting-from-an-IND

Conclusion: if FX-322 does well, and gets approved as quick as Gleevec, then it could theoretically get approved by 2020.
That would be the best case scenario. But it means everything would have to happen in 1 year (2019) and by everything I mean phase 2 + phase 3 + paperwork. Hard to believe since phase 1 is still running and was started in 2016 (a year and a half ago).
 
My long-term hope is that Frequency Therapeutics or Decibel Therapeutics has a viable treatment within 5 to 10 years. For now, my sights are set on neuromodulation. MuteButton 2 is as close as 2019 or '20. I'll fly to Ireland if I have to. So there are very promising things that we can do very soon. Don't give up.
I'm going to take a look at that project. Is there a thread on this forum to follow-up with this project?
 
I realize safety and side effects may take years to determine but will we at least know soon whether or not FX-322 is growing cochlear hair cells in humans? Or will these results be kept private until much later?
No you will know at the start of the new year. In just a couple of months we will know if it in fact works on humans. If it works on mice, maybe it'll work on my deaf dog lol
 
Best case scenario this works.

We have LASIK for eyes.

Would this be the LASIK for ears?
No this is something I believe would be covered by most insurance companies. I imagine it will be much cheaper than paying a couple thousand dollars for someone's hearing aid. Hearing loss is also more disabling than being a little near sighted.
 
That would be the best case scenario. But it means everything would have to happen in 1 year (2019) and by everything I mean phase 2 + phase 3 + paperwork. Hard to believe since phase 1 is still running and was started in 2016 (a year and a half ago).
It's simple math man. The rate at which they are having studies can predict when the drug will come out.
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now