Your posts read like a long rant of subjectivity from East to West. The above quote is an objective finding. How a person - you, me, or Dr. Philippe - interprets that, is when it becomes subjective. What is loud, what is not loud - mixed with location of tinnitus in the head (versus ears) is when it becomes subjective. So is suffering.
Disagreeing with an objective finding is like saying gravity doesn't exist. It does. Whether you like it or not. You and others may be surprised to learn that masking of tinnitus can in the majority of cases be achieved with a matching sound of 5 to 10 dB above hearing threshold (at that frequency). Does that mean those patients don't suffer - I don't know: I am not even going to attempt to answer that question. I merely pointed out an objective finding, ok?
So I looked up Dr. Philippe Peignard (on Youtube) - here is a short clip:
I am not a huge fan of applying psychotherapy to a condition like tinnitus (tinnitus is not a disease of the mind, but of the brain). However, the 2nd female patient did seem to have regained her life (and had been suffering for 20 years). So, it is perhaps possible in some cases to get a person's life back on track. And if it works, well, that is all that matters, right?
Thanks. I had a quick look. Not sure why his story is so important to share. He is just another tinnitus patient complaining about the lack of treatment options in the world. There are many millions like him. Indeed a lot of his information is subjective - complaining why doctors are useless. What else is new? More so than any other group of patients, tinnitus patients are their own worst enemy:
- To begin with, tinnitus is highly preventable (as noise is the leading culprit - by far). But human beings tend not to care (ignorance as well as "it happens to someone else"-attitude). Big mistake...
- Even after a person develops tinnitus, and therefore knows how disabling it can be, there is still no shortage of folks who continue to push their luck by e.g. attending a concert for the 2nd time. Just search this forum.
- This forum probably has close to one million visitors per year. If each person donated just one dollar that would be one million dollars (a pretty impressive sum of money). Instead, you will find that raising just a couple of hundred dollars can be a challenge. But it gets worse: not only can this forum not get a visitor to pay up one dollar, but asking the same visitor to rate a post on Facebook is also a problem (and that's just a click with a mouse button - pretty cheap). I always feel that there is a direct link between action and suffering. And it would seem that the tinnitus community is excellent at complaining rather than endorsing some very worthwhile efforts here on TinnitusTalk. But one dollar (or even a mouse click) is too much to ask (apparently).
I will let you decide on that. This year I will be assisting the world's leading tinnitus researchers win a prize which will enable them to promote tinnitus research. The framework can be seen here:
http://journal.frontiersin.org/rese...erstanding-of-tinnitus-heterogeneity#overview
(and yes, the above will indirectly benefit you as a patient).
Later this week, I will be submitting a review of intratympanic delivery applications to a stem cell hospital (along with a research paper on cochlear regeneration using MSCs). If the procedure can be adopted to humans, that will become the first hospital in the world to offer such a treatment - advancing the therapy timeline to the patient by several years...
Well, they do say "don't text and drive". Now you know why they say it...