This is a question I have given some thought to. For both my first, and especially the second stem cell treatment, I recall reflecting on the matter while on the 10-hour plane trip back-and-forth from Europe to Asia.
Of all the five senses, why is the sense-of-hearing so different and susceptible to injury and knock-on complications? Why is it that, in comparison, people who lose some of their sight due to - eg. ageing - do
not suddenly experience visual "hallucinations". Or why is it that people with allergies - and who have lost most of their sense of smell - do not develop problems with that part of the sensory system?
Why is there no "safety" mechanism built into the auditory system when things go wrong (ie. loss of hearing from noise, disease, ageing, or any other problem which may occur)? Losing hearing is bad enough; why do we have to be punished twice?
A rhetorical question might be: why is not more being done to prevent 90% of all cases of NIHL-tinnitus? Something which seems so obvious and straightforward to address.
And a question I have raised with the EU DGfH&C...
That is something everyone on this forum has asked themselves. Why me?
Some are more "guilty" than others. But the suffering is the same.
And some stories stand out more than others. Take
@Markku who developed tinnitus from ear syringing - can you imagine anything more sinister and unfortunate than developing tinnitus from a routine medical procedure - and from people you are supposed to trust? I cannot...
Every human being has a certain number of "degrees of freedom". Use them to your advantage in terms of seeking relief. There is
always something else you can do...