Hi
@GregCA. Firstly I want to say that I don't come at any of this from a TRT etc standpoint. My personal view is that sound therapies at best offer little more than a psychological crutch while people pass through the normal habituation process, and at worst might delay it. I am a fan of CBT/relaxation/mindfulness techniques though. I think people clearly fall into different camps with this and they hold their views like a religion which is hard to shake. I try to keep myself outside of this and prefer to try to tailor treatments to what seems to work best for an individual.
Hello
@brownbear - thank you for your message.
I urge you to take a look at research around sound therapy, in particular Windowed White Noise. Some people can benefit greatly from it, in terms of volume reduction, not just psy help. Like anything, it's not a slam dunk and clearly doesn't work on everyone. I think one of the biggest issues with these types of therapies is patient compliance. These therapies are grueling: listen to something for 4-6 hours a day may not always be possible even if you have the will power.
Although I have given up on my own tinnitus I haven't given up on other peoples and am happy to search for a reversible cause for as long as the patient wants, as long as I don't feel my investigations are causing further psychological harm through disappointment. I fully agree that an immense level of harm can be caused early on by ignorant GPs and ENTs. Now when I first see a patient distressed by T (which isn't very often I should add - most don't care) I search hard for a cause and I try VERY hard to install a sense of hope regarding habituation.
As a patient (maybe this isn't common, but I'll give you my personal feeling about it), when I first go to the GP/ENT, I want to have hope that this can be fixed and that the doctor is going to be "on my team" to do whatever s/he can to find a solution. This is right after onset, and
any talks about habituation are only going to drive my anxiety through the roof. I will perceive it as being given up on because it is discussed so early in the process.
In terms of timing, I would prefer not mention that quite yet. Instead, what would have worked for me is: "ok, this is the diagnosis flowchart we're going to follow: first we need to find out what is causing this, because T is just a symptom" followed by "it looks like you have <insert diagnosis here>, and for this, there is no miracle cure, but some things work for some people, so I suggest a plan where we're going to try them one after the other until we find something that works for you. Here's the list." - and ONLY after we've exhausted the treatments (which is months/years after onset), I want to hear about habituation: "I'm afraid we've tried quite a few things. How are you feeling about it now after 2 years? Do you need any help to sleep/work/etc? We haven't been successful with the current therapies, so we'll work together on a plan to <<hang on>> until a cure is found and make it as comfortable and productive for you. There is some research going on and here are the 3 promising avenues that we should keep an eye on for you: <list 3 research vectors that you feel can help me and a time frame>. In the mean time, there are some psy techniques that can help you hang in in there (talk about CBT, mindfulness, etc). We should sync up every 6-12 months to see what's new and what we can do next. I'll update you on the state of the research while you update me on your management of your condition."
I don't believe that trying to help yourself to habituate and searching for causes is mutually exclusive.
No argument there.
I do believe though that for as long as T holds such strong negative emotions for you then you will find it hard to habituate.
This is probably true, but it's also a "cop out" to have an easy way to blame the patient in case habituation isn't happening.
A lot of psy methods consist of actually telling yourself (sometimes out loud) sentences that you want to believe, like "I will get better", "I am strong", "I can do this". This is a very well known motivational technique. We are brainwashing ourselves into thinking "we're doing good". That seems perhaps like a good idea, until we need to provide feedback to others who will assess how we're doing.
When we go to the doctor who coached us about all this "positive thinking", he will prompt us about progress. "How are you doing?" he asks. If I follow my training and answer positively ("I am doing great!") he will believe I'm doing great and chalk it up as a success in habituation. If I answer negatively ("not really good, doc"), he'll tell me it's because I'm "holding too many strong negative emotions". If it sounds familiar it's because I quoted you. I don't mean this to be confrontational: I just want to show that there is no good way to report non-habituation and be tallied as such.
Some people are so brainwashed that they are even in denial that lack of habituation is a possible outcome. We see it in this very thread, just a few messages above this one. They first claim that scientific research is unreliable, then that it's a subjective assessment, then that patients aren't reliable when they report what they feel. The cognitive dissonance is really hard to recognize and address, and I think the church of "positive thinking" is, to a limited extent, to blame for it.
This can necessitate suspending our normal logical thought processes about how much we hate it and want it gone.
Anyone with a cartesian mind will be unable to suspend logical thought process: you can't lie to brain reasoning. You can repeat yourself "1+1=3" all you want, your brain is going to see through it every single time. I admit that with time and brainwashing techniques, one's brain could be rewired to think that "1+1=3" is the new truth: I don't need convincing that it's possible, since I can witness it myself from the prose written in this forum. I am happy that this kind of process works for some, as it provides some kind of relief to them, not unlike religion when it comes to touching on difficult subjects such as death. I can't hide that I wish I was part of the believers: it makes life much easier! I'm quite jealous in that respect.
I think the more intelligent you are the harder this might be, maybe.
I agree with that. It is in line with my observation above. But I'd refrain from mentioning this too loudly as it can come off as offensive. The same observation was provided to me when I consulted with a Tinnitus expert (an actual doctor, not the kind of experts we find in online forums) in San Francisco.
I strongly believe that the moment the sound means nothing to you, you will stop perceiving it.
Maybe, but I'm not sure our bodies can always rewire ourselves to that state. I'm thinking of people who suffer from chronic pain (for decades). Do you think that "the moment the [pain] means nothing to you, you will stop perceiving it" applies to them too?
Wow that was a lot of rambling crap. Good luck my friend.
That "crap" was appreciated. Hang in there, and good luck to you too!