Anyway, it's all conjecture at this point, because I'm fairly sure, we may never understand the full complexity of T, for quite sometime.
Trying to
fully understand a perceptual phenomeon might be impossible --
this book makes a pretty good case for the idea that total self-awareness is more or less impossible, which I tend to agree with. So, that means the big questions like "what is 'I'?" aren't anything we're going to be able to pin down in a lab... and in some very basic ways, I think "what is tinnitus?" is more or less the same question as "what is 'I'"?
What that leaves us with, basically, is
black box hacking. We can analyze the output of the system (tinnitus intensity, tones, etc) and analyze the inputs (food, novel drugs, rTMS, whatever), and then try to understand the correlation between input and output.
Having spent a lot of time reading about this, it seems like one thing we do know about tinnitus is that it's
really complex. It's a perceptual phenomeon that arises
often but not always as a result of an input deficit, but only in some minority of people who have that deficit.
I guess the silver lining to all this is that conceptualizing these things in this way, has allowed me to have some unique and interesting insights into my own mind as a result of the tinnitus. I'd happily trade them away for silence, sure, but you know, if 100,000,000 years of human evolution gives you lemons, you may as well add some sugar to it...