• This Saturday, November 16, you have the chance to ask Tinnitus Quest anything.

    The entire Executive Board, including Dr. Dirk de Ridder and Dr. Hamid Djalilian are taking part.

    The event takes place 7 AM Pacific, 9 AM Central, 10 AM Eastern, 3 PM UK (GMT).

    ➡️ Read More & Register!

Is There a New Dotcom Bubble?

In order to keep the world stability a new corporate tax will be needed. Here in Spain people are striking because they pay a lot of tax, as a percentage over their income, but large companies are all evading taxes, and not paying what they should, specially Big Tech.
 
The product is leveraged but I hold enough cash to back those contracts, so I am just committing less money, just the deposit.
So you are not using borrowed money then? If you are only using your own deposit then you are not leveraged. You're confusing me. If you are using half of your own, and half borrowed, then you are not committing less of your money, because if your trade goes wrong you will not only lose a proportion/all of your own money, but you will owe the broker their money as well, plus interest usually. You mentioned margin earlier, are you sure you didn't get a margin call and was made to deposit more money to cover yourself? You usually need a margin account to trade futures, but you're losing me in your descriptions because you said you are experienced at using leverage, but it doesn't sound like you are using it.

If you have deposited $17k, then what amount of leverage are you using on it, and how many contracts are you running?

It doesn't sound like you understand what you are doing. The other day you said you closed out a trade after just 50 points. You then said you were going to reopen the following day, so that means that you are now down 179 points at the time of writing this. Why close out so quickly, and then go again the following day if you think it's going to drop further?

You can't really manage the risk when using leverage as it's inherently riskier. You could argue the case if you were hedging against a much larger long position or something.
 
If you have deposited $17k, then what amount of leverage are you using on it, and how many contracts are you running?
I already explained the contract above. The futures contract is leveraged by definition, it is not a cash trade, it is a leveraged trade, but if you hold the cash amount to cover the nominal price of the contract this is a safer bet.

It is easier to understand with long contracts. You may buy the SP500 and this contract, as all the futures, is leveraged, so you will only deposit a certain amount which is way lower than the nominal price of the contract. If you hold cash for the nominal price of the contract your position will never be closed if you don't want to, as the SP500 would need to fall to zero points for your position to be closed by your broker...

I think what I am explaining is pretty standard anyway..
 
I already explained the contract above. The futures contract is leveraged by definition, it is not a cash trade, it is a leveraged trade, but if you hold the cash amount to cover the nominal price of the contract this is a safer bet.
Ok, I understand. What you wrote was really confusing. What is the leveraged ratio you're working to?

What you are doing is balls out risky, so fair play to you if it comes off.
 
In Spain people are already striking for higher salaries. Last month there was a national strike of railway workers. Today metal workers are striking. Next month lorry drivers will go on strike.

Soon there will be a general strike here.

Central banks are ignoring people and everyone is sick of that. They've all had enough.
Yes, but do you realize they both want and anticipate that?

Spain has been a careless socialist/communist country for some time. Spending money, enriching friends and government officials.

https://infobrics.org/post/32379/

Crisis from 2008 - 2014? Now, more problems.





Many nations are in economic trouble and they are colluding - they will blame it on covid (and climate change) - of course, they are lying. How will people react? Will they fall for this crap?

They are creating a problem and will force their solution via "The Great Reset" (go research it) and with their cryptocurrency.
 
Yes, but do you realize they both want and anticipate that?

Spain has been a careless socialist/communist country for some time. Spending money, enriching friends and government officials.

https://infobrics.org/post/32379/

Crisis from 2008 - 2014? Now, more problems.

Many nations are in economic trouble and they are colluding - they will blame it on covid (and climate change) - of course, they are lying. How will people react? Will they fall for this crap?

They are creating a problem and will force their solution via "The Great Reset" (go research it) and with their cryptocurrency.
Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus, France, etc are all doing really badly. Greece has a debt that's two times bigger than its economy, so it's highly likely they will eventually have to default. They've already been bailed out before, but where does that money come from? If they default they will be kicked out of the EU and will suffer a huge economic depression. The same is true for all the other countries. I think the Euro was a bad idea; trying to make all those different economies work under one currency was always going to be a problem.

These issues have been around for a long time and predate the coronavirus by many years. COVID-19 just took an untenable situation and made it worse.
 
Yes, but do you realize they both want and anticipate that?

Spain has been a careless socialist/communist country for some time. Spending money, enriching friends and government officials.

https://infobrics.org/post/32379/

Crisis from 2008 - 2014? Now, more problems.





Many nations are in economic trouble and they are colluding - they will blame it on covid (and climate change) - of course, they are lying. How will people react? Will they fall for this crap?

They are creating a problem and will force their solution via "The Great Reset" (go research it) and with their cryptocurrency.

I think in Spain people will continue striking. There will be these company strikes, strikes at certain sectors, like transport (due to the high price of fuel) etc.

As taxes go up and budget cuts happen, we will be headed for further trouble and a general strike. If there is a big economic downturn, which I personally expect to happen, there will be violence.

The metal strike in Southern Spain has been violent already, like the old times, workers chipping bricks from the pavement and throwing them at the police, tear gas, explosions, fire, etc.

This is the only way workers have traditionally been able to achieve changes to their poor labour conditions.
 
Today Alibaba falls more than 10%.

Disappointing results...

Paytm shares have also plummeted in India.

When governments start taxing American Big Tech, it will follow the same course.
 
It's 20 USD per NASDAQ point.

Deposit is 17k.

Contract size (nominal) is NASDAQ x 20 USD.

What will your cut-off point be as you've gotta be nearly $5k down at the moment. Are you gonna hold and see if it turns or are you prepared to take it to your margin?

Do you ever allow yourself to get margin called? I'm interested to know what your strategy is as I only deal with spot trades.
 
What you would actually have is hyperinflation as the cost of everything would skyrocket.
...not if government puts price controls like in USSR. In USSR an engineer, a CEO and a plumber lived in the same apartment complex and they all greeted and respected each other. Their salaries were 2-3 times greater than each other, but not like in Capitalism where a CEO lives in a mansion and earning 1000x more than the engineer.
 
In order to keep the world stability a new corporate tax will be needed. Here in Spain people are striking because they pay a lot of tax, as a percentage over their income, but large companies are all evading taxes, and not paying what they should, specially Big Tech.
Really think that Corporate tax will save us?

You need PRICE CONTROL, not corporate tax. Any tax on corporations will be passed on to the consumer lol.
 
...not if government puts price controls like in USSR. In USSR an engineer, a CEO and a plumber lived in the same apartment complex and they all greeted and respected each other. Their salaries were 2-3 times greater than each other, but not like in Capitalism where a CEO lives in a mansion and earning 1000x more than the engineer.
The USSR was a monolithic, monopolistic, communistic state where nobody prospered. There wouldn't be enough assets to go around if everyone had the same buying power. There has to be some degree of reward and achievement for those who create wealth and innovate, otherwise the pioneers of this world would live the same lifestyle as those who choose to sit on their sofa all day.
 
Really think that Corporate tax will save us?

You need PRICE CONTROL, not corporate tax. Any tax on corporations will be passed on to the consumer lol.
I think we are in for major changes, including new privacy and data protection laws, and also a new corporate tax. Otherwise, there will be protests and violence, like we are seeing already.

It's unfair that the richest people on Earth, the owners of Tech Companies are not paying their taxes, which results on everyone else having to pay more tax.

There's also the possibility that de facto monopolies like Google, Facebook, Microsoft are forced to split in several companies and compete. This would also be a major policy shift, since the EU Antitrust Commissioner usually declares that these companies are acting as a monopoly but then goes on to authorise their M&A activity.

This policy shift may happen because deep down those companies are interesting in splitting, like we are seeing in other fields (GE being a good example, Toshiba, etc).
 
...not if government puts price controls like in USSR. In USSR an engineer, a CEO and a plumber lived in the same apartment complex and they all greeted and respected each other. Their salaries were 2-3 times greater than each other, but not like in Capitalism where a CEO lives in a mansion and earning 1000x more than the engineer.
Price controls don't work, for a variety of reasons, though.
 
It's unfair that the richest people on Earth, the owners of Tech Companies are not paying their taxes, which results on everyone else having to pay more tax.
That is not the source of Spain's economic problems, though.

Everything started going downhill after you joined the Euro and big construction companies started borrowing loads of money, and a lot of your banks were happy to throw all of their money into bad investments. The amount of borrowing got your country into big trouble, and the coronavirus lockdowns have magnified this. Spain had a budget deficit of 11% of GDP in 2020. Raising taxes would likely kill productivity and make it even worse. You can't just tax your way out of a deficit and debt that is that large.

I'm still not sure why you blame tech companies for Spain's problems.
 
The USSR was a monolithic, monopolistic, communistic state where nobody prospered. There wouldn't be enough assets to go around if everyone had the same buying power. There has to be some degree of reward and achievement for those who create wealth and innovate, otherwise the pioneers of this world would live the same lifestyle as those who choose to sit on their sofa all day.
But in fact every single person in USSR prospered in the 60's, 70's and 80's (much like the golden age in the US - granted there were no millionaires but people were generally very happy and Poverty free. Look at American major cities with hoarded of homeless and drug addicts - this did not exist in the Soviet Union)... My parents told me as first eye witnesses living in the Soviet Union.

Things went down the shitter when USA destabilized Russia's economy hurling the country into devastating Poverty, leaving the Russian army in ruins (USA's plan worked).

Not saying communism is perfect, but it is sustainable under ideal conditions. The problem with communism is that leaders get power hungry, authoritarian and despotized (think Stalin)... and since there are no "elections" one cannot change leaders every so often.

In any event mankind is doomed, Capitalism or Communism... it's human nature's fault.

Under IDEAL conditions, both Capitalism and Communism can work, but nothing is ideal.

I think the middle ground is something like Switzerland where its Capitalist society provides a certain minimum quality of life to ALL its citizens... but this is only 1 Country doing this... no wonder it's very hard to immigrate there.
 
When former Yugoslavia was under the authoritarian leadership of Josip Tito, many people living in those parts saw him as a benevolent dictator. My grandfather (from Montenegro) always tells me how quality of life was way better under him. Everyone was given a car and taken care of with other basic needs. It's not the same in terms of prosperity for some of these countries now post Yugoslav breakup.

I dunno, I guess I wanted to share this anecdote.
 
When former Yugoslavia was under the authoritarian leadership of Josip Tito, many people living in those parts saw him as a benevolent dictator. My grandfather (from Montenegro) always tells me how quality of life was way better under him. Everyone was given a car and taken care of with other basic needs. It's not the same in terms of prosperity for some of these countries now post Yugoslav breakup.

I dunno, I guess I wanted to share this anecdote.
It sounds like it could be a form of Stockholm syndrome. You have to make do with the situation you are dealt as you have no other choice, but his situation was different as it seemed to be less repressive.

The USSR was oppressive. Its citizens were denied the freedom to do what they wanted, they couldn't listen to western music or even wear western clothing. There were no free markets as the government controlled around 98% of the retail trade, and private businesses were not allowed. People were put to death for merely sneaking in jeans and music via X-ray films, for example.

Societies stagnate under communist regimes. We have seen this time and time again.
 
Look at the difference between East Germany and West Germany. When the Berlin Wall came down, you could clearly see which side had prospered.
 
E6CAB125-5D93-439E-AB0F-A771D03F5514.jpeg
 
People were put to death for merely sneaking in jeans and music via X-ray films, for example.
Incorrect. The penalty was jail time or sent to Siberia... do not exaggerate lol.

Did I say Commie was perfect? No, but in order to control prices and keep everyone equal more or less, they could not have people sneak Western merchandise which was often sold for profit (speculation... sound familiar?)... Yes, speculation and business for personal profit was illegal, but this was to prevent big business from exploiting the common people as they do today.

The death sentence shooting squad against the wall was earlier during Stalin days. In the 60's and onward death sentences were only in extreme cases of treason (not smuggling a Beatles record).

Whatever, who cares anyways. We have much worse things to worry about today like the vaccine mandates that they now want to force people in Austria soon or face prison time - how is that different from Stalin?
There has to be some degree of reward and achievement for those who create wealth and innovate, otherwise the pioneers of this world would live the same lifestyle as those who choose to sit on their sofa all day.
Really? Is that why the world's greatest scientists were in Russia at the time and USA was scared shitless lol. Theft was extremely rare, you could leave your bike outside and it would still be there 3 hours later... I could go on and on at all the perks.

Russians were also first in Space and USSR had the most Olympic gold medals... quite an achievement for couch potatoes. The golden period of USSR was quite nice. WW2 veterans were respected there, in fact my grandfather who lost a leg against the Nazis near Stalingrad, received a modified car for free. Which country has ever gave away free vehicles to its injured war veterans please tell me.

You guys know only what the West has indocrinated you against former USSR so I don't blame you.
 
Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus, France, etc are all doing really badly. Greece has a debt that's two times bigger than its economy, so it's highly likely they will eventually have to default. They've already been bailed out before, but where does that money come from? If they default they will be kicked out of the EU and will suffer a huge economic depression. The same is true for all the other countries. I think the Euro was a bad idea; trying to make all those different economies work under one currency was always going to be a problem.

These issues have been around for a long time and predate the coronavirus by many years. COVID-19 just took an untenable situation and made it worse.
The EU is better known as the new world order, collapsing the economy, it's a control measure.
 
Incorrect. The penalty was jail time or sent to Siberia... do not exaggerate lol.
I read a silly amount of information and can recall various facts about certain things.

They did kill people:

In 1961, the traffickers Rokotov and Faibishenko were sentenced to death. One of the charges against them was "trafficking in jeans." The echo of that story reverberates still: There is a firm in the U.S. that makes Rokotov & Fainberg jeans in their memory.
Did I say Commie was perfect? No
Who would want to live like they did? It's outright oppression and is indefensible.
The death sentence shooting squad against the wall was earlier during Stalin days. In the 60's and onward death, sentences were only in extreme cases of treason (not smuggling a Beatles record).
Who knows how many died for smuggling in western stuff, besides those on record? Look what happened with Chernobyl; the USSR lied through their teeth when Sweden detected a radioactive fallout coming from their terrain. They told the rest of the world that their reactor was safe because they were always about keeping face rather than protecting lives.
Really? Is that why the world's greatest scientists were in Russia at the time and USA was scared shitless lol. Theft was extremely rare, you could leave your bike outside and it would still be there 3 hours later... I could go on and on at all the perks.
Is that why their scientists were fired from their jobs, imprisoned, and executed if they didn't renounce genetics? In the USSR, Doctors were also paid less than bus drivers.

The Russians undoubtedly had great scientific minds, but one could argue that they were not appropriately rewarded for their work.

I wouldn't call what you described as "perks" either. People lived in constant fear of the state.
You guys know only what the West has indocrinated you against former USSR so I don't blame you.
Maybe. I can only go by historical references and the words of those who had experience of living there. @Bill Bauer is one such example.
 
There's a summary of Lysenko here (he was bat shit crazy):

Although it's impossible to say for sure, Trofim Lysenko probably killed more human beings than any individual scientist in history. Other dubious scientific achievements have cut thousands upon thousands of lives short: dynamite, poison gas, atomic bombs. But Lysenko, a Soviet biologist, condemned perhaps millions of people to starvation through bogus agricultural research—and did so without hesitation. Only guns and gunpowder, the collective product of many researchers over several centuries, can match such carnage.

Officials eventually put Lysenko in charge of Soviet agriculture in the 1930s. The only problem was, he had batty scientific ideas. In particular, he loathed genetics. Although a young field, genetics advanced rapidly in the 1910s and 1920s; the first Nobel Prize for work in genetics was awarded in 1933. And especially in that era, genetics emphasized fixed traits: Plants and animals have stable characteristics, encoded as genes, which they pass down to their children. Although nominally a biologist, Lysenko considered such ideas reactionary and evil, since he saw them as reinforcing the status quo and denying all capacity for change. (He in fact denied that genes existed.)

Instead, as the journalist Jasper Becker has described in the book Hungry Ghosts, Lysenko promoted the Marxist idea that the environment alone shapes plants and animals. Put them in the proper setting and expose them to the right stimuli, he declared, and you can remake them to an almost infinite degree.

To this end, Lysenko began to "educate" Soviet crops to sprout at different times of year by soaking them in freezing water, among other practices. He then claimed that future generations of crops would remember these environmental cues and, even without being treated themselves, would inherit the beneficial traits. According to traditional genetics, this is impossible: It's akin to cutting the tail off a cat and expecting her to give birth to tailless kittens. Lysenko, undeterred, was soon bragging about growing orange trees in Siberia, according to Hungry Ghosts. He also promised to boost crop yields nationwide and convert the empty Russian interior into vast farms.


The rest is here:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/12/trofim-lysenko-soviet-union-russia/548786/
 
Each regime has its goods and bads. Even in capitalist countries across Europe you see a huge variation in how the wealth is spread. I believe Norway is doing quite well, it gets lots of income from the oil industry and citizens seem to be getting lots of benefits from it.

Holland is not perfect, but I have always been grateful to the social system there. You barely see homeless people there and there's always some sense of social security (I remember my Canadian colleague couldn't comprehend that in Holland you get 1 year full pay on a sick leave and 2nd year 75 percent of your salary). The downside of the Dutch society is that it's rather hard to achieve the top, as the society will try to push you down. Paul Verhoeven was talking about it in one of the interviews, that he had to go to the US to fully utilise his talent.

So I believe it's very much down to how the society is, people's mentality etc rather than the regime alone.
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now