Worse and more disheartening. It's actually made by a member of the ATA.Yeah, that video was bad. The poor kids in the comments who talk about hearing it and saying "Oh, that's just aging? Alright." Makes me sad. They're being misinformed by what should be a video actually explaining the issue correctly. They probably consulted a local audiologist or ENT. Maybe not even that, because I almost would expect TRT to be pushed with how bad it was.
The ATA is the worst. They are ineffective at spreading the word on tinnitus, ineffective at treating it, and ineffective at researching it. Honestly, the only hearing organization I think should exist at this point is the Hearing Health Foundation. I mean, the HLAA isn't terrible either, I just wish they actually got the word out more.Worse and more disheartening. It's actually made by a member of the ATA.
Totally agree - for people with a history of noise exposure (both recreational and occupational) tinnitus tends to be a clear symptom of hearing damage and should serve as a warning sign to take better care of your hearing. I really dislike these types of videos because they tend to talk about tinnitus in a vacuum without discussing the importance of hearing health. I fear we have a long way to go before tinnitus awareness is viewed as a public health issue.At 3:19 of the video:
"Subjective tinnitus is a symptom associated with practically every known ear disorder, it isn't necessarily a bad thing. While it's appearance can be surprising, subjective tinnitus has no inherently negative consequences. But for some, tinnitus episodes can trigger traumatic memories or otherwise distressing feelings, which increase the sound's intrusiveness."
I hate this video so much. They say tinnitus "isn't necessarily a bad thing" and that it has "no inherently negative consequences."
Fuck you to whoever made this TED video.
It completely downplays the many people that suffers from tinnitus.
The only positive for this TED video is the explanation for tinnitus mechanism. Everything else completely misses the mark.
Disgusting.
Same. It was an opportunity to actually go over hearing health, but they refused to take it.I really dislike these types of videos because they tend to talk about tinnitus in a vacuum without discussing the importance of hearing health.
When are we going to get a celebrity who actually highlights the importance of hearing health and that both tinnitus and hyperacusis can get worse with continuing to expose your ears to loud noises.Totally agree - for people with a history of noise exposure (both recreational and occupational) tinnitus tends to be a clear symptom of hearing damage and should serve as a warning sign to take better care of your hearing. I really dislike these types of videos because they tend to talk about tinnitus in a vacuum without discussing the importance of hearing health. I fear we have a long way to go before tinnitus awareness is viewed as a public health issue.
It's still a pretty glaring lack of information, that. It also lacks actual concrete safety tips, coping out with the age old "Don't listen to loud sounds for long." Going over the promising research would have been good too. Did anyone look at the lesson page? It gets even sillier.Just taken a look at this video and to be honest I didn't think it was that bad.
My main gripe is that instead of saying there's no known cure and therefore all doctors can do is help sufferers develop "neutral associations" to these subjective sounds, (i.e. he's advocating CBT), he should have instead highlighted all of the promising proper research going on.
You might want to post something on the Ted Ed discussion page of their lesson as well. With the way YouTube works, only the most upvoted stuff will actually be seen, really.For the TED-Ed video, I submitted the following comment using our Tinnitus Hub YouTube channel, but for some reason the comment's not visible to others. It might have gone into a queue pending for approval or something...
View attachment 40264