OK. It matters to the outside world. I absolutely understand your point.
But what does it
really matter? You follow
@Mike34's excellent recommendations for hyperacusis - and as a direct result of doing so, life for you (which previously was lousy) is now full, rich, productive, and enjoyable. Isn't that what you are looking for? Or will you settle for nothing less than perfection?
I have severe hyperacusis of a very precise kind that affects the startle reflex. All sounds, at the moment they begin, hurt me. So I'm fine in the shower, relatively, I'm OK moving around the house, I don't have serious kinds of ear fullness but there definitely is an echo of sorts, a vibration there as a result of sound. I use a fan or a fanlike sound to cover exterior sounds to sleep with, and I avoid venues with too much sound. But that's not the kind of sound you have to put up with if you need to hustle to survive. I wouldn't call that a success of CBT or habituation. If TRT were to prove a success it would have to make the case for TRT without adding advice like this thread to its winning showcase because that skews their positive results.
My survival methods I invented myself, and I had to question myself thoroughly because of the deep uncertain economic consequences of the needs I discovered I had. All I got from CBT was ridiculous encouragement on adapting to other people and correcting my thought, and I don't think Jastreboff and co were ready for the tremendous difference between getting someone with T and someone with H to do TRT. Back when I tried I was hustling to survive, so I was living in pretty horrific precarious conditions, and that's one of the reasons I didn't do TRT.
I'm not saying TRT is definitely a failure. I downloaded a bunch of books on T and one of them is J's Neurophysiological model, and I've read the odd article by him, and he doesn't want to go deep into the intricacies of what it means to create a positive wall of sound for someone with H. For example, if I did TRT, I would need to do it in silence, because TRT isn't a deep bass sound that covers up the horrible sound of cars passing by, but J is so obsessed with getting the tinnitus folk out of their caves, he can't carve a coherent TRT environment for those with H. And that's another of the reasons why I never did TRT. There are more though, too many to list here, but another is that I did masking, two things in the ears which were a massive scam, so by the time they said ''oh no, we mean TRT, masking is so 2005'', I was rolling my eyes, and still am.
It's too early for me to give a decisive conclusion on this, but things aren't looking good for the sound enrichment science. I'd like to know why the phantom pain of H that Margaret Jastreboff believes in is met by other doctors claiming they've been cutting spasming tensor muscles and eliminating H in the process, and why my local TRT doc tells me I have anxiety and that he believes it would be severely unethical to cut the tensor (he hasn't done me a tympanometry yet but he was talking as if objective T and H was rarer than getting Laura Antonelli as a wife). I'm not saying I have objective H yet, for all I know right now, TRT could be right, and those that talk about botox and cutting spasming muscle are unethical pieces of shit. But I am wondering how many of those with superior canal dehiscence Jastreboff discarded as anxious before the condition was discovered in the early 00s. Time to get my head back into those pubmed abstracts and obscure russian pirated article sites Elsevier has got its knickers in a twist about, I guess.