My Posting Place

i seriously wonder to the 6 + post that went missing.
View attachment 18326
The mods have begun their purge. This is only the beginning.

wD47gM9.jpg
 
they removed the really long dinosaur post and the four people who quoted it.

also btw MPP is heading towards 40,000 views
 
This thread is actually so hilarious. When I first joined and was new to tinnitus I had a quick look and thought it was all very weird.
Looked again yesterday and genuinely loled many times.
 
upload_2018-5-16_23-5-30.png

frequency's drug can't fail. There drug activates natural dormant stem cells in the body that only has one job which is to regenerate cochlear hair cells.


tfw the FDA fails frequency even though fx322 has sucessful ability to regenerate hair cells, but because their gel used to navigate the cochlea is inaffective and they are not allowed to alter their product during a trial. also as well as the fact that this will not help much at all in profound or severe hearing loss. and no one cares about mentally ill MPP users with mild hearing loss.
 
Seriously I predict that if Frequency fails it will either because of these five things in no order

1: Frequencies pattened gel fails to navigate the cochlea efficiently
2: Severe and profound hearing loss not being treated effectively even though Frequency knows it won't
3: Over populated hair cell regeneration in lower frequencies causing low frequency hearing distortion
4: The unavoidable but natural process observed in reptiles of high frequency stereocillia being longer when regenerated
5: Hidden hearing loss audiotory nerve and synapse damage still present appearing that hearing is still distorted


Seriously if the FDA's only job is to go out of there way to prevent breakthoughs, they have hearing aid lobbyist and TRT shills in their pockets. The method Frequency is using is natural unlike gene therapy or pluri potent stem cells. It works with the bodies native biology

In a nut shell it uses the progenitor cell code from the intestine to the the progenitor cells in the cochlea to divide and turn into new hair cells.

Basically I predict a sad ending where the FDA deems mild and moderate hearing loss not important and the during the trial they make a breakthrough on how to navigate the cochlea better but they aren't allowed to modify their method for another 10 years by starting another trial.

Year of cochlear hair cell generation
2033
 
Seriously I predict that if Frequency fails it will either because of these five things in no order

1: Frequencies pattened gel fails to navigate the cochlea efficiently
2: Severe and profound hearing loss not being treated effectively even though Frequency knows it won't
3: Over populated hair cell regeneration in lower frequencies causing low frequency hearing distortion
4: The unavoidable but natural process observed in reptiles of high frequency stereocillia being longer when regenerated
5: Hidden hearing loss audiotory nerve and synapse damage still present appearing that hearing is still distorted


Seriously if the FDA's only job is to go out of there way to prevent breakthoughs, they have hearing aid lobbyist and TRT shills in their pockets. The method Frequency is using is natural unlike gene therapy or pluri potent stem cells. It works with the bodies native biology

In a nut shell it uses the progenitor cell code from the intestine to the the progenitor cells in the cochlea to divide and turn into new hair cells.

Basically I predict a sad ending where the FDA deems mild and moderate hearing loss not important and the during the trial they make a breakthrough on how to navigate the cochlea better but they aren't allowed to modify their method for another 10 years by starting another trial.

Year of cochlear hair cell generation
2033
The fact they are even this close is astonishing honestly, considering how non-existent our options have been. I'm realizing that medical research in general is a lot more primitive than I give it at times. However, even if this fails first round, they will be able to tweak and move forward. As much shit as we give the FDA, it does have people in it that want to see useful treatments and drugs come out on the market. I bet a lot of old dudes involved with it would love for their hearing loss & tinnitus to be treatable.
 
There are days pre-tinnitus & hearing loss me wouldn't believe how I'm actually clutching on a concept for a cure that has never been done before in human history, but here I am. Silly me. I think the way I've been able to justify it for myself is that this 2-4 year painful, but wakening experience won't keep me on a sidetrack long enough to miss out the good years I still have left.

Part of me believes there are people who really want to find a cure and part of my believes people just want to get paid for the time being while they sit in a lab doing the bare minimum, because hey, they are heathly, so there is no hurry. I guess the reality is somewhere in the middle.

Anyway, next year will really be the make or break.
 
There are days pre-tinnitus & hearing loss me wouldn't believe how I'm actually clutching on a concept for a cure that has never been done before in human history, but here I am. Silly me. I think the way I've been able to justify it for myself is that this 2-4 year painful, but wakening experience won't keep me on a sidetrack long enough to miss out the good years I still have left.

Part of me believes there are people who really want to find a cure and part of my believes people just want to get paid for the time being while they sit on a lab doing the bare minimum, because hey, they are heathly, so they is no hurry. I guess the reality is somewhere in the middle.

Anyway, next year will really be the make or break.
I was the opposite. I never had hearing loss but I always assumed that there would be a cure for it in 2020 because I read an article saying there would be. So I thought tinnitus research was much farther ahead than it really was, especially considering how common it is.

But you're right. Next year may be the biggest year for tinnitus research. We learn if we will see a treatment in 2020, or if it's back to playing the waiting game that's been going on since humanity was around.
 
I was the opposite. I never had hearing loss but I always assumed that there would be a cure for it in 2020 because I read an article saying there would be. So I thought tinnitus research was much farther ahead than it really was, especially considering how common it is.

Yeah, though tinnitus has also taught me that science articles mostly mean nothing. It's usually just one study that then gets exploited by shitty tabloids for their click-bait article of the day and then it gets reposted multiple times on Facebook tinnitus groups by soccer moms who post Minion memes. That's the real suffering of T. :LOL:

All in all, getting health problems really gives you a hard and fast-track lesson in life, the reality of humans and how society works in general. So I think that's the only "good" thing to come out of this, because nowadays I feel guilty no more of telling a white lie or taking a short cut when I know there are people selling fake Tinnitus cures.
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now