I guess I will have to give up sleep for 6 months if I want to try this device.Dr. Shore said:10. Current or former use of any of the following medications within the past 6 months: high dose aspirin (>325mg/day), high dose NSAIDs (ibuprofen, Motrin, Celebrex) (>800mg/day), narcotics (any opioids), lithium, clonazepam, oxazepam, cholinergic medications (anti-dementia medications), anti-depressant medications (serotonin specific reuptake inhibitors; SSRIs, tri-cyclic anti-depressants; TCAs); anti-seizure/convulsant medications (Depakote), anti-psychotic medications (Haldol, Seroquel), Ototoxic medications, other chemotherapy agents, benzodiazepines, and central nervous system stimulants
Looks like those lists are regarding the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were used for participating in the study rather than a patient using the device for treatment after it's approved commercially. For example, one of the items listed is "9. Resides within 100 miles of the study site." It makes sense that they would be more selective for the study participants.I guess I will have to give up sleep for 6 months if I want to try this device.
Yes, this answer will likely get amended soon.Looks like those lists are regarding the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were used for participating in the study rather than a patient using the device for treatment after it's approved commercially. For example, one of the items listed is "9. Resides within 100 miles of the study site." It makes sense that they would be more selective for the study participants.
Go and take a look for yourself. You can search the FDA's public 501k premarket database. I couldn't find anything related to Auricle, but perhaps someone with more know-how and more time could find something.When she says "The company is certainly working on a regulatory clearance" I hope that means is that they've submitted to the FDA!
Question said:Are you planning any follow-up studies?
I'm hoping that she unintentionally gave away here that there is currently no FDA requirement on the table for additional studies, especially since the crossover part was not considered for analysis (and likely submission...)Dr. Shore said:There will be real-world studies once the device is marketed.
Nope. And she of course also consulted others in the company, so it's definitely company policy not to discuss it.Was it really not possible to say if the device has been submitted for approval with the FDA, CE etc?
Honestly, I fully understand this. Before my worsening I was at a stage with my tinnitus that I wouldn't have been tempted to alter it in anyway.Interesting to hear that Dr. Shore has tinnitus herself, although she said hers was mild. It's crazy that she wouldn't want to try her own device. She did state that was because of conflict of interest, which I get, but oh man, that would be so hard for me!
This was known from the absolute beginning that those were the stipulations to be involved for the study. in regards to the modulation aspect, it doesn't mean it won't or can't work. It just means it's not been tested as of yet.Well, it was extremely disheartening to read that part of the inclusion criteria was an ability to modulate your tinnitus with neck and jaw movements and that your hearing loss can be no greater than -50 dB. If that's what's going to be the bottom line with the device, I might have to end it all, after all.
I have been feeling for a while now that we won't be seeing this device anytime soon. The 2 year time frame everyone figured seemed very optimistic to me.I'm not enthused by the potential timelines. Was it really not possible to say if the device has been submitted for approval with the FDA, CE etc?
I understand the modulation part, but I don't understand the dB limitation of the device.Well, it was extremely disheartening to read that part of the inclusion criteria was an ability to modulate your tinnitus with neck and jaw movements and that your hearing loss can be no greater than -50 dB. If that's what's going to be the bottom line with the device, I might have to end it all, after all.
Well, by the looks of it, the device does work. Now, they obviously know more than we do about it, and if it is all that promising, then they are going to hide as much as they can before going to market with it.I'm not enthused by the potential timelines. Was it really not possible to say if the device has been submitted for approval with the FDA, CE etc?
I think what she means is that all silence is relative. Our bodies make noise and there are few places on earth that are truly quiet. At least that's my understanding of what she's said! I've had tinnitus for 34 years so I have no idea what quiet may be like at all!What does Dr. Shore mean by no one experiences true silence? Does she mean that even those without tinnitus don't experience silence or what? Or was she referring to the patients undergoing the treatment?
Think of it this way. There are known timelines for FDA approval of devices. De Novo devices are supposed to be approximately 150 days (give or take, it varies) and 510(K) is supposed to be decided on in 90 days (same, it varies).I'm not enthused by the potential timelines. Was it really not possible to say if the device has been submitted for approval with the FDA, CE etc?
We know what we had before tinnitus. I found her answer for this question a little odd too.What does Dr. Shore mean by no one experiences true silence? Does she mean that even those without tinnitus don't experience silence or what? Or was she referring to the patients undergoing the treatment? We had an example of @kelpiemsp who experienced silence from a somewhat similar device (University of Minnesota).
Silence to me is simply not hearing the ringing.I think what she means is that all silence is relative. Our bodies make noise and there are few places on earth that are truly quiet. At least that's my understanding of what she's said! I've had tinnitus for 34 years so I have no idea what quiet may be like at all!
Question said:Has the federal government or any other other governmental institution taken interest in the device? Considering tinnitus is the #1 veterans' disability, has the government offered more funding to you?
I'm glad someone asked this question and the answer truly shows how uncaring, incompetent, and ineffective our federal government is, especially the the US Veterans Administration!Dr. Shore said:Outside of the engagement with the FDA, there are no on-going collaborations with any other governmental division or entity
Email them, call your representative in Congress.I'm glad someone asked this question and the answer truly shows how uncaring, incompetent, and ineffective our federal government is, especially the the US Veterans Administration!
One billion a year spent on tinnitus claims and along comes the first viable treatment for tinnitus in the history of warfare, yet administrative chiefs in that organization just sit there with their thumbs up their arse instead of pushing for funding to get this device out to the hundreds of thousands of vets suffering from deliberating tinnitus. Absolutely shameful and embarrassing! Heads should roll in that organization!
Yes, I should. I've always wondered why Veterans' associations in the US, and there must be many, have never campaigned aggressively for more funding for tinnitus research? If I had severe intrusive tinnitus that resulted from serving my country, I'd be raising bloody hell with my Senators and Congressional representatives to push for major research funding. I would think Veterans' associations would have a lot of clout and support from the public on this issue. Maybe they have campaigned and I don't know. Any veterans on here know the answer?Email them, call your representative in Congress.