OTO-313: tinnitus, definitely acute. May help some people more chronically.I should have asked this earlier, but what's OTO-413's first goal? Hearing loss or tinnitus? If it's for tinnitus, is it for acute or chronic one tinnitus?
It's for hidden hearing loss aka cochlear synaptopathy. But many researchers think that hidden hearing loss could be the cause of tinnitus (although it could be both hair-cell or synapse loss, anywhere where there is reduced auditory input). So it's reasonable to assume that it will benefit those of us with noise-induced tinnitus.I should have asked this earlier, but what's OTO-413's first goal? Hearing loss or tinnitus? If it's for tinnitus, is it for acute or chronic one tinnitus?
Sorry to just throw a link at you, but I found this one helpful.I should have asked this earlier, but what's OTO-413's first goal? Hearing loss or tinnitus? If it's for tinnitus, is it for acute or chronic one tinnitus?
OTO-413 is for synapses - AKA speech-in-noise function. There could be benefit with tinnitus too although this has not yet been examined and neither was it something being measured in the primary trial.I should have asked this earlier, but what's OTO-413's first goal? Hearing loss or tinnitus? If it's for tinnitus, is it for acute or chronic one tinnitus?
It's aimed at hearing in noise specifically, and indirectly at hearing loss. The hopes are it will help with other hearing-related ailments as well.I should have asked this earlier, but what's OTO-413's first goal? Hearing loss or tinnitus? If it's for tinnitus, is it for acute or chronic one tinnitus?
Hearing loss called synaptopathy. Hearing-in-noise, specifically.I should have asked this earlier, but what's OTO-413's first goal? Hearing loss or tinnitus? If it's for tinnitus, is it for acute or chronic one tinnitus?
Has anyone talked about these potential treatments with their specialist?Hearing loss called synaptopathy. Hearing-in-noise, specifically.
However, many posting here have provided evidence that point to restoring this type of loss may also treat tinnitus. The tinnitus would likely have to be a symptom of noise induced hearing loss.
Many believe that those with tinnitus as a symptom of noise-induced hearing loss or acquired sensorineural hearing loss will likely need both OTO-413 and FX-322 since the damage is likely mixed between synaptopathy and hair cell damage/loss.Has anyone talked about these potential treatments with their specialist?
If there is more than one treatment, we may need further guidance in which potential treatment would best apply to our specific situation. I can see how I would possibly fit into more than one category.
My doctors had differing opinions on what had occurred with my hearing.
You'd probably be very disappointed to find out just how little clinicians usually follow research (there are exceptions). Instead, they often wait for the new treatment or drug to come out and the pharmaceutical reps come by and train the doctors on the new drug (this is a big part of the marketing budget for new drugs).Has anyone talked about these potential treatments with their specialist?
If there is more than one treatment, we may need further guidance in which potential treatment would best apply to our specific situation. I can see how I would possibly fit into more than one category.
My doctors had differing opinions on what had occurred with my hearing.
I have noticed I study current research more than most of my doctors. My PCP and specialist both use a program to input symptoms and it gives them a list of potential causes.You'd probably be very disappointed to find out just how little clinicians usually follow research (there are exceptions). Instead, they often wait for the new treatment or drug to come out and the pharmaceutical reps come by and train the doctors on the new drug (this is a big part of the marketing budget for new drugs).
They will be trained when and why to use these drugs at that time (and at continuing education conferences which is one reason they are required to keep licenses, but this is still only after the drug is launched).
Same - this condition is debilitating. Lighten or remove it and I'll let the doctor spit in my ear if necessary. Just give me some reliefI wouldn't personally be apprehensive towards having to get redosed every few months. If it is the case that this needs to happen then so be it. It should theoretically make the cost of the medicine much more affordable as I can't see Otonomy obtaining their desired and profitable uptake if they make it unaffordable to many especially when it would potentially be a 4 times a year treatment.
I wish there was a sad react emoji.I have noticed I study current research more than most of my doctors. My PCP and specialist both use a program to input symptoms and it gives them a list of potential causes.
Right now I'd like them to hurry the F up and confirm that tinnitus is impacted by these drugs.I cannot wait to feel the cold steel hit my cochlea! Hurry the F up and approve FX-322 and OTO-413!
We already know about the FX-322 anecdotes but they are measuring tinnitus results with their current trial.Right now I'd like them to hurry the F up and confirm that tinnitus is impacted by these drugs.
I know there was some anecdotal evidence on the FX-322, but right now I think we are all assuming, not without reason, that restoring lost hearing will make the tinnitus decrease or go away. A not insignificant part of me is afraid that while these drugs may restore hearing they may not be particularly effective in making my brain stop screeching.
You are so right, we need a bit more anecdotes about tinnitus improvement and not just hearing improvement before I dare to believe it for real...I know there was some anecdotal evidence on the FX-322, but right now I think we are all assuming, not without reason, that restoring lost hearing will make the tinnitus decrease or go away. A not insignificant part of me is afraid that while these drugs may restore hearing they may not be particularly effective in making my brain stop screeching.
Just a few more weeks to wait. I can see the headlines now for FX-322: "20-30 dB restored across frequencies above 1 kHz, tinnitus greatly reduced or eliminated in 87% of patients".Right now I'd like them to hurry the F up and confirm that tinnitus is impacted by these drugs.
I know there was some anecdotal evidence on the FX-322, but right now I think we are all assuming, not without reason, that restoring lost hearing will make the tinnitus decrease or go away. A not insignificant part of me is afraid that while these drugs may restore hearing they may not be particularly effective in making my brain stop screeching.
I also have my doubts.I know there was some anecdotal evidence on the FX-322, but right now I think we are all assuming, not without reason, that restoring lost hearing will make the tinnitus decrease or go away. A not insignificant part of me is afraid that while these drugs may restore hearing they may not be particularly effective in making my brain stop screeching.
We don't know if it was the majority or if it wasn't though. All we know is some participants reported tinnitus improvement. Some could have had improvement and not mentioned it. Some could have mentioned it but the ENTs didn't pass on the information because it's anecdotal and not the main point of the research. We also don't know how many people actually had tinnitus in the first place.If effective for tinnitus, all the people who had benefits from FX-322 or OTO-413 should have clearly shown the reduction or elimination of their tinnitus, but it didn't occur (only in some cases it seems that the tinnitus decreased, but not in all or the majority of cases).
This is true but you could require both drugs in both ears in order to eliminate tinnitus or reduce it. Which we won't know until both of these drugs are out.I also have my doubts.
If effective for tinnitus, all the people who had benefits from FX-322 or OTO-413 should have clearly shown the reduction or elimination of their tinnitus, but it didn't occur (only in some cases it seems that the tinnitus decreased, but not in all or the majority of cases).
Where are you getting this information?(only in some cases it seems that the tinnitus decreased, but not in all or the majority of cases).
I don't think Frequency Therapeutics gave any number regarding the percentage of tinnitus patients that experienced improvement. Their focus was on hearing restoration for those with mild to moderate hearing loss. I believe that the majority of people with mild to moderate hearing loss either don't have tinnitus or it is so light it isn't even thought about, so who knows how many of the study cohort have the buzz.I also have my doubts.
If effective for tinnitus, all the people who had benefits from FX-322 or OTO-413 should have clearly shown the reduction or elimination of their tinnitus, but it didn't occur (only in some cases it seems that the tinnitus decreased, but not in all or the majority of cases).
It has been mentioned in this forum several times that some people showed improvement of their tinnitus (people who were in the hearing loss trial, but also had tinnitus, the fact that some of them improved is what has made Frequency Therapeutics - if I recall correctly - take tinnitus into account for Phase 2 or 3).Where are you getting this information?
Patients with "bothersome" tinnitus was an exclusion factor for OTO-413 Phase 1/2. So if they did have it, it would be so mild they may not show significant improvement anyway. Also, no tinnitus measurement (TFI) was used in this trial.I also have my doubts.
If effective for tinnitus, all the people who had benefits from FX-322 or OTO-413 should have clearly shown the reduction or elimination of their tinnitus, but it didn't occur (only in some cases it seems that the tinnitus has decreased, but not all or the majority).
They weren't measuring for tinnitus improvement in Phase 1/2 though.If effective for tinnitus, all the people who had benefits from FX-322 or OTO-413 should have clearly shown the reduction or elimination of their tinnitus, but it didn't occur (only in some cases it seems that the tinnitus has decreased, but not all or the majority).
The only thing that Frequency Therapeutics said is that they had anecdotal evidence that it helps tinnitus, enough to add it to their exploratory measures.It has been mentioned in this forum several times that some people showed improvement of their tinnitus (people who were in the hearing loss trial, but also had tinnitus, the fact that some of them improved is what has made Frequency Therapeutics - if I recall correctly - take tinnitus into account for Phase 2 or 3).
In fact why are people here talking about a treatment for hearing loss if this is a tinnitus forum? Because it is believed that this treatment will improve or eliminate tinnitus, right?
Yes, this is true. What I was questioning was that your statement about that "it didn't occur" is only a guess at this point, since neither Frequency Therapeutics nor Otonomy has collected any data on tinnitus so far.It has been mentioned in this forum several times that some people showed improvement of their tinnitus (people who were in the hearing loss trial, but also had tinnitus, the fact that some of them improved is what has made Frequency Therapeutics - if I recall correctly - take tinnitus into account for Phase 2 or 3).
Otonomy may have put themselves in a cannibalization scenario with OTO-313 for tinnitus. If it turns out OTO-413 treats tinnitus as a symptom of synaptopathy; it reduces the need for a OTO-313 which might be a problem.
Nice problem to have.If it turns out OTO-413 treats tinnitus as a symptom of synaptopathy; it reduces the need for a OTO-313 which might be a problem.