Okay, so that's
Me,
@Lane,
@PeteJ,
@Wrfortiscue and
@Brian P; none of whom are actually
"anti-vaxxers" (except in the case of these mRNA/adenovirus vaccines which are utilising (to date) an unstable technology that has been rushed through testing and approval. Two of whom have
actually suffered adverse reactions. Which leaves just the first three... yeah, that's "a lot".
Damnit guys! which one of you told him about our
agenda!?
No one's supposed to know about our
agenda, and the fact that we're gonna be up to our necks in
beanie babies when all these suckers don't take their vaccines! ↶(`∇´)
What "other thread"?
This has got to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read on Tinnitus Talk.
For once,
just this once, could the staff
please make public, who has voted in this poll, just so we can all reclaim some of the brain cells we have lost from reading this comment which takes the term
"conspiracy theory" to a whole new level.
From the study you linked:
22 of the 100 were given
remdesivir:
Don't forget ototoxicity during the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) pandemic! - PubMed (nih.gov)
Is hearing loss a symptom of coronovirus? (starkey.com)
From this we can surmise that
22 of the 31 people that suffered hearing loss are not a reliable indicator of COVID-19's effect on the ear. So we're left with
9 people that can credibly attribute any hearing loss to COVID-19 in
this study.
That means,
in worst case scenario (factoring in the previous percentage which still included the use of remdesivir)
39% of 9 people developed tinnitus; leaving us with a grand total of:
4 out of 100 people developing tinnitus from COVID-19.
4%
Reminds me of something...
oh yeah!
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/posts/617132/
VAERS is an incredibly unreliable source of information, hence why the mainstream media refers to clinical trials and controlled studies instead of relying on a system similar to this when disseminating COVID-19 hype and sensationalism.
Manipulating VAERS Data through Underreporting | Armstrong Economics
Are the Scientific Journals Censoring the Science? Part 1: The Removal of the Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in VAERS, by Elsevier and Current Problems in Cardiology (trialsitenews.com)
It's a well known fact that approximately
only 1% of adverse events are reported to
VAERS (
Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) (openvaers.com)) and that's if the reaction occurs on the day of administration. Once you're past the 2 week mark and a reaction manifests itself, most people are no longer sure if the vaccine is related, and so never register a report.
It's very easy to dismiss people who have legitimate concerns about these "vaccines", because unlike with COVID-19, the efforts to record deaths and injury related to them are pathetic.
Just think about how many controlled studies there are into:
COVID-19 wrecking people's health vs COVID-19 vaccines wrecking people's health, and you'll see it's a landslide.
What's funny though, is even though
VAERS is underreporting and we're unable to get a
true picture of the devastation the "vaccines" are causing, it's still monumentally greater than anything we've ever seen with any other
drug/medicine/vaccine before in history...