Research on the Origins of Hyperacusis and Potential Future Cochlear Imaging

[Scruffiey]

New imaging tool reveals the brain's role in cochlea sensitivity

The brain may play a role in helping the ear regulate its sensitivity to sound and compensate for hearing loss by sending a signal to a structure in the inner ear known as the cochlea, according to a study that was just published in the Journal of Neuroscience.

www.news-medical.net

TL;DR: The brain increasing gain in the cochlea after hearing loss appears to have been proven in mice. Researchers also developed a new imaging tool to observe the cochlea in real time, which they plan to adapt into a device for humans.

 

[HighleyTall]

Interesting. This could explain mild hyperacusis in elderly individuals who don't experience tinnitus. However, in my opinion, hearing loss due to noise trauma is a completely different issue.

 

[Scruffiey]

Interesting. This could explain mild hyperacusis in elderly individuals who don't experience tinnitus. However, in my opinion, hearing loss due to noise trauma is a completely different issue.

Why do you think it's completely different? I assume old age still degrades the auditory nerve and synapses, but noise trauma speeds up the process.

The lack of tinnitus may simply be because the brain adapts to the loss as it happens more gradually or due to genetics.

 

[Joeseph Stope]

New imaging tool reveals the brain's role in cochlea sensitivity

The brain may play a role in helping the ear regulate its sensitivity to sound and compensate for hearing loss by sending a signal to a structure in the inner ear known as the cochlea, according to a study that was just published in the Journal of Neuroscience.

www.news-medical.net

TL;DR: The brain increasing gain in the cochlea after hearing loss appears to have been proven in mice. Researchers also developed a new imaging tool to observe the cochlea in real time, which they plan to adapt into a device for humans.

This sounds reeeeally big, maybe even a breakthrough?

Years ago, I read a scientific article describing how inner and outer hair cells resemble a microscopic wheat field. However, they could not be viewed in vivo because the cochlea is one of the hardest bones in the body, and its proximity to the brain makes access difficult and risky. Additionally, the hair cells are so small, microscopic, even nanoscopic, that imaging them has been a challenge.

I pictured it like a gardener tending to his plants. Suppose he observes that giving them more water or sunlight helps them thrive. He can then encourage their growth. Years ago, I received a plant as a gift and made sure to give it plenty of water and sunlight. I cared for it diligently, yet it seemed to wither away. Alarmed, I turned to a medical student down the hall, knowing she had experience with plants. She took one look and said, "That is a desert plant. You have been overwatering it. And it is a cave plant. It does not like sunlight."

I was stunned. But from that day on, once I adjusted its care, the plant thrived.

If doctors develop a method to view hair cells in detail, perhaps they can figure out how to help them thrive, repair, or even rejuvenate them.

@Nick47, a quick question. The Bionics Institute of Australia has a method for detecting the presence of tinnitus and measuring its volume. Can they also determine its frequency or frequencies? Just curious.

I think wrestling with the question of how to cure tinnitus can only take us so far. Understanding the true nature of the condition might take us further. Who knows, this knowledge might even align with the imaging produced by the machine mentioned earlier.

Well done, @Scruffiey. This is a major find. Articles like this lift my spirits.

Now, all we have to do is wait… oh, about ten years or so.

 

[SafeMusicFan]

This is incredible.

The ability to "collect images of the cochlea in awake animals for the first time" is a major breakthrough.

If this can be applied to humans, it could open up a world of possibilities for tinnitus and hyperacusis research. Once we can directly observe what is happening in the cochlea, the lingering uncertainty about the exact mechanisms behind tinnitus and hyperacusis could finally start to clear up—and quickly, I believe.

 

[Scruffiey]

This sounds reeeeally big, maybe even a breakthrough?

Years ago, I read a scientific article describing how inner and outer hair cells resemble a microscopic wheat field. However, they could not be viewed in vivo because the cochlea is one of the hardest bones in the body, and its proximity to the brain makes access difficult and risky. Additionally, the hair cells are so small, microscopic, even nanoscopic, that imaging them has been a challenge.

I pictured it like a gardener tending to his plants. Suppose he observes that giving them more water or sunlight helps them thrive. He can then encourage their growth. Years ago, I received a plant as a gift and made sure to give it plenty of water and sunlight. I cared for it diligently, yet it seemed to wither away. Alarmed, I turned to a medical student down the hall, knowing she had experience with plants. She took one look and said, "That is a desert plant. You have been overwatering it. And it is a cave plant. It does not like sunlight."

I was stunned. But from that day on, once I adjusted its care, the plant thrived.

If doctors develop a method to view hair cells in detail, perhaps they can figure out how to help them thrive, repair, or even rejuvenate them.

@Nick47, a quick question. The Bionics Institute of Australia has a method for detecting the presence of tinnitus and measuring its volume. Can they also determine its frequency or frequencies? Just curious.

I think wrestling with the question of how to cure tinnitus can only take us so far. Understanding the true nature of the condition might take us further. Who knows, this knowledge might even align with the imaging produced by the machine mentioned earlier.

Well done, @Scruffy. This is a major find. Articles like this lift my spirits.

Now, all we have to do is wait… oh, about ten years or so.

Yes, I really do think this is promising research, and better imaging tools are desperately needed. Before all my issues started, I had no idea how limited otoscopes were. It's almost unbelievable that no one has worked on improving them before—until you remember how neglected hearing care has been.

Yeah… I really wish I had waited another 10 to 15 years before getting tinnitus and all the issues that come with it. Or better yet, never. Never would have been good too.

Thanks for sharing this. Digging up research like this is what keeps me going right now. At least I won't have to be 65 with tinnitus so loud they use me to warn ships in dense fog.

It finally feels like a time for real hope—not just the desperate grasping at straws we had 10 to 15 years ago. Researchers actually seem to be getting a factual understanding of what's happening, rather than just theorizing. That's a huge step forward. It brings us closer to fixing this—or at the very least, finding treatments that make life more livable. Know your enemy.

 

[SafeMusicFan]

Yeah… I really wish I had waited another 10 to 15 years before getting tinnitus and all the issues that come with it. Or better yet, never. Never would have been good too.

Thanks for sharing this. Digging up research like this is what keeps me going right now. At least I won't have to be 65 with tinnitus so loud they use me to warn ships in dense fog.

It finally feels like a time for real hope—not just the desperate grasping at straws we had 10 to 15 years ago. Researchers actually seem to be getting a factual understanding of what's happening, rather than just theorizing. That's a huge step forward. It brings us closer to fixing this—or at the very least, finding treatments that make life more livable. Know your enemy.

That is also a huge motivator for me, especially on days when spikes are bad.

Given that we are already seeing small breakthroughs in research and planting the seeds for more through catalyst initiatives like Tinnitus Quest, I truly believe significant advances could be made in the next five to ten years—both in treatments and potential cures. It may not be a complete solution just yet, although that would be incredible, but any step in that direction is a major milestone.

As long as we continue building knowledge and strengthening our understanding, we will eventually get there.

 

[HighleyTall]

Soon, they will discover that tinnitus and hyperacusis share the same cause:

• Imagine the OHCs as little amplifiers in your cochlea. Normally, they boost quiet sounds so you hear better. The MOC pathway acts like a sound engineer, keeping the volume in check. But if hearing loss happens (like in the study's deafferented mice), and the MOC cranks up the OHC amplification to compensate, it might overdo it. This could amplify tiny, random vibrations or electrical noise in the ear that wouldn't normally be noticed—kind of like a guitar amp picking up feedback hum when the gain's too high. Your brain interprets this as a constant ringing or buzzing: tinnitus.

• Hyperacusis (sound sensitivity): With the OHCs turned up too much because of the MOC's long-term boost, normal sounds could get amplified way more than they should. It's like the amp making every pluck of the string painfully loud. This could explain why people with hyperacusis find everyday noises—like a door closing—unbearably intense.

OHCs as the Culprit: The study showed that when the MOC efferents were intact, amplification went up after hearing loss, but not when they were knocked out (Alpha9-/- mice). This points to the OHCs—controlled by the MOC—as the key players. If they're overactive or stuck in "high gain" mode, they could be driving both the phantom sounds (tinnitus) and the over-sensitivity (hyperacusis).

 

[RingerBell]

I tried to check whether the original article mentioned if the OCT they used was heavily modified or similar to the versions used in ophthalmology. However, this was not stated in the free version of the article.

I've noticed that OCT scans are now commonly available, even in walk-in optician eye checkups, making them widely used in ophthalmology. If the device they used was similar to those in ophthalmology, it could likely be made easily accessible—assuming the technique also works in humans.

Here's the link to the original article (paywall): The medial olivocochlear efferent pathway potentiates cochlear amplification in response to hearing loss

 

[Joeseph Stope]

This OCT technology scanner dates back to 1991.

It is unfortunate that it has been widely available in most eye doctors' offices for routine inspections of glaucoma and macular degeneration for so many years. Yet, thirty-four years later, someone is only now considering adapting it for auditory use… !!!

Racing forward in leaps and bounds? Really?