no it's like waking up one day half deafIs that the same thing as NIHL?
no it's like waking up one day half deafIs that the same thing as NIHL?
No. SSHL — sometimes called sudden deafness — is sudden hearing loss usually in one ear in less than 72 hours. The loss is at least 30dB and the cause is often unknown.My ENT and Au
You are correct. Researchers, doctors, ENTs, audiologists are like vampires/vultures when a person is sick they dont come to help but to make them more miserable.
Is that the same thing as NIHL?
No. SSHL — sometimes called sudden deafness — is sudden hearing loss usually in one ear in less than 72 hours. The loss is at least 30dB and the cause is often unknown.
For me, it was one moment I could hear and the next moment I was wondering why my house was so quiet with a high pitch noise.
Yes, and I always misspell that word.Oh wow. So SSHL stands for sensirouianal hearing loss? I dont know If I spelled that right.
Sorry for being ignorant about not knowing the difference between NIHL and SSHL.
That's not my impression of the matter at all. On contrary, what I learned in my investigations is that many of these "so called researchers" do in fact have these conditions themselves. I don't know about Bryan Pollard, but many of them do have these conditions. Let me recall a few names... let's see now...Do not be fooled by so-called Researches that write reports using technical language to impress. The majority of these people have never experienced tinnitus or hyperacusis and therefore no nothing about these conditions.
@EDogg you never tried the rob music therapy? Or what you think of it?Hi @Layla23
Thank you for raising this topic of discussion and I am sorry to hear of your struggles with these challenges. I, too, have the "terrible triad" of severe hyperacusis, sound reactive tinnitus and ear pain, bilateral, for just over a year now. You are doing the right thing by investigating, asking questions, raising discussion, and learning all you can about this. Although there may not be a lot written on these conditions, you can empower yourself by understanding what is known and what can be done about it.
As pointed out, no one really knows the answer as to what this phenomenon of "reactive tinnitus" is, and part of that is due to the lack of a pure definition. I see it as a dynamic, unmaskable presentation of tinnitus that overlays instantaneously on external sounds. Mine is worsened particularly by static high pitch sounds like fans. More dynamic sounds seem to "confuse" the brain and lessen its impact. Nonetheless, from my personal experience, what I qualify as "reactive tinnitus" is closely tied to the hip with the severity of my hyperacusis. Meaning, when my hyperacusis is worse (threshold lower) the reactive tinnitus is also more intense, and vice versa. I believe the reactive tinnitus, at least in my case, is indeed tinnitus that is modulated by accompanying hyperacusis. This can further be supported by the experiences I have read of other folks dealing with this. It seems, from these accounts, that by desensitizing the hyperacusis, the "reactive tinnitus" also follows suit and eventually becomes a non-issue. This is my goal, and perhaps you may find this information helpful as well. The barrier to desensitization for me right now is the ear pain, which I am in the process of finding ways to lessen with medication and seeking advice from experienced neuro-otologists and audiologists.
Again, appreciate you raising this discussion and hope you find a treatment strategy that works for you.
Best,
EDogg
I totally agree.As far as the answer....I don't know. I'm not a doctor. I won't pretend for a second I know the answer because I don't. But I do know reactive T is real. And awful.
You know you've habituated when you find some of the 'veteran's' posts more annoying than your tinnitus.
I'm good thanks Ed. Largely back to my normal self. Enjoying life again. How are you?
You are so right. Why do researchers argue about it too though? One section of researchers say reactive tinnitus is the same thing as hyperacusis, other section say it's not.@Layla23 thanks for bringing this up. I think more and more researchers start to understand that reactive tinnitus and hyperacusis are different things. There are a lot of people claiming it's the same thing but I believe that is based more on their own experience and old literature (in my option closely connected to TRT supporters).
Here is for example Wiki's explanation of hyperacusis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperacusis
This has nothing to do with the reactive tinnitus I suffer from. I have no pain and feel no discomfort from sounds. It just sets off my tinnitus to crazy levels. The people saying hyperacusis is the same thing as reactive tinnitus and that there are sub categories of hyperacusis that describe what we are experiencing. When I ask them to send this literature over I never got any reply.
Reactive tinnitus is sadly under diagnosed. I live a good life with reactive tinnitus but it took me a very long time to adopt. I still have rough days but nothing special compared to others with chronic illnesses. I believe that I will never habituate. I often surprise myself once I have not noticed my tinnitus for 5 min or more. It just a part of me now. The reason wwhyay it is so hard to live with is because of this: Imagine yourself in a room with a fan or AC. It is quite easy to not to think about. But if you have dripping faucet in the same room it gets harder. If it drops without regularity it gets even harder.
For me this is a very important subject and I hope that the community learn to respect what we experience and just stop to dismiss this as hyperacusis because it's simply not. For all you people saying it's the same thing, PLEASE STOP or send over some hard facts from the literature that what we are describing is the same thing as hyperacusis.