With respect you have had tinnitus for a short while hyperacusis the same. I have had tinnitus for far longer. My hyperacusis was once very severe now completely cured and remained this way for over 20 years. You and a few others in this forum give a sentimental reverence to the likes of the person you refer to but I don't. I and others in this forum that have had noise induced tinnitus for many years, know it through and through. I look to them to gain further knowledge.
Gooday.
Michael
If I were anything like you, Michael, I'd probably take great offense in you patronising me, and would go on and threaten to ignore you. But I'm not so it's all right.
I feel stupid for even pointing this out, but I had tinnitus for over a decade. Not that I think this will make you validate my opinion any more, because I'm not sure anyone could have enough years under the belt to be worthy of your esteem.
You're quick to dismiss the groundbreaking work Bryan Pollard (you clearly didn't care to even look up his name so you could properly spell it) has done in putting the different forms of hyperacusis on the map. I think you're afraid Michael, afraid that somehow this man could have a clue which doesn't align with your views and could put your whole persona at risk and the countless articles you've written and like to refer to when given half the chance to do so.
Advocating TRT and not willing to have your views challenged... This actually reminds me of some other guy...
Bryan Pollard is a hyperacusis sufferer and an expert who dedicated his life to the study of hyperacusis. If you're not willing to at least keep an open mind to what he has to say, then I don't know who Michael Leigh does listen to. (Actually I think I do know).
I've seen it happen so many times on here, the same way over and over again. You mingle in a topic, only to have someone disagree and then all of a sudden it's about good manners and respect (and really, I very rarely see any true disrespect towards you even though you're easy to offend, which is somewhat surprising given the amount of nonsensical blabber you write).
That blabber wouldn't be so bad in itself if it were harmless, but the other day I had to bite my tongue when I saw you telling someone to stay away from HBOT, as if you have the slightest knowledge or experience on the matter.
I personally have done HBOT, but I'm not one to project my own experiences onto someone else, although I will be happy to talk about my own experience if asked to.
For me, when giving that advice, your opinion is based on nothing, and is potentially harmful when someone could be in the window of recovery for HBOT to be effective (this is a very controversial topic I'm aware)
The difference between you and many people on the forum is that most keep an open mindset and discuss for the sake of getting closer to some sort of common truth. The absolute certainty with which you state some of your own opinions and believe that they should apply to everyone is very similar to the certainty that is displayed by anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, COVID-non believers etc...
I'm not writing this for you Michael, because you cannot be convinced and have one of the most rigid mindsets I've ever come across. I'm writing this because I feel I have to speak out against some of your opinions and not let myself be patronised.
I shan't be commenting further on the topic. 'ave a gooday.