I have that same book. Almost all drugs are in there and are listed as causing most of the above. For Mirtazapine though the percentages were small; 0.1 - 1%. If you're one of those 1% though that's small consolation. I dont think there's a drug that isnt in that book as having potential for causing damage to the hearing system.
Is it further differentiated in the book whether a percentage is meant to depict permanent or temporary tinnitus? Well, nobody can say that for sure, but more in a sense of "more likely to be permanent or temporary..."
I wonder if I have asked about this before from you... I don't remember, but I have a feeling I have.
Just asking that because the majority of the drugs that are able to cause tinnitus, it's usually temporary in nature which resolves on its own after the drug is no longer taken. There are these super bad drugs, but generally speaking wouldn't we say that in most cases the effects are temporary?
I would think that Remeron don't cause permanent tinnitus/hearing loss for every 100th or 1000th person. It could be a figure for temporary tinnitus, and within that percentage probably is an x amount of permanent changes.
Still, a 1% percentage of something (in this case it begins at 0,1% but I'm now just going for the sake of conversation) is a lot to me.
I've always thought that once a person has tinnitus (/hearing loss), they are more predisposed to further worsening of tinnitus/hearing loss. It really sucks to be
afraid of it getting worse. I am. We have too many people here who've had manageable tinnitus and then it's become a monster.
I will need to get my hands on that book sooner or later. I don't currently need the information myself, but it would be a good source to advise others.
Anyway, J M has had too much bad luck. Unbelievable