- Jul 8, 2019
- 1,161
- Tinnitus Since
- 1991
- Cause of Tinnitus
- Loud Music / family history
Please keep us updated. Unless there's an NDA.I'm in the trial - 10th December.
Good luck Deb. Two days to go!I'm in the trial - 10th December.
I can answer that. I applied for the study from northern NSW and was told that they were limiting the study to the Melbourne area for the moment, but they did put me on a waiting list if the study expands the area to other states.If you mean, are they recruiting interstate, I didn't ask that as I live locally.
I'm not sure how to classify my tinnitus, but it's very vocal.
I wonder whether The Bionics Institute will use the same approach or the same method used by Hough Ear Institute or whether it will be different. This will be the interesting question.I am very curious to see how they'll objectively measure tinnitus. Like will they be able to see it visually? Or as just a chart? I have so many questions. I am curious! I suppose I have always wanted a way to "record" my tinnitus in a way that I could show people. It's probably not how it will work though.
That's just awesome, so now no one will know...Looks like @DebInAustralia had to sign an NDA.
I don't know for sure. But she definitely ghosted us.That's just awesome, so now no one will know...
I was fitted with a cap, and exposed to quiet, pink noise, and visual stimuli on a computer at certain intervals.
This sounds very interesting, though I have to wonder exactly how this might translate to determining the presence and severity of phantom noises. I guess that's part of all the sciencey stuff that these guys get paid to do!I was fitted with a cap, and exposed to quiet, pink noise, and visual stimuli on a computer at certain intervals.
Great news! That's quite a shower cap you're wearingView attachment 42384
Sorry guys.
The trial will end roughly by the end of 2021.
The Bionics Institute will analyse my data using their algorithms, which will ascertain its severity, in mid January. I'll be able to post any information I receive.
I was fitted with a cap, and exposed to quiet, pink noise, and visual stimuli on a computer at certain intervals.
As @Hazel and @Markku have stated, The Bionics Institute have agreed to making a Tinnitus Talk Podcast episode in early 2021, so you'll have a chance to ask pertinent questions.
This might lead to just that. To date there is no way to measure tinnitus objectively. Anything that might help us is based on anecdotal reports.I already know my tinnitus is loud. I don't need a machine to objectively assess it. I need better treatments or a cure.
I agree, at this point it's just poking around and seeing what works!This might lead to just that. To date there is no way to measure tinnitus objectively. Anything that might help us is based on anecdotal reports.
I already know my tinnitus is loud. I don't need a machine to objectively assess it. I need better treatments or a cure.
Essentially this is the measurement from a scientific perspective that will put to bed any claims about treatments that are successful being simply anecdotal or placebo as it eliminates subjectiveness.It would be a monumental step forward if they can measure tinnitus objectively. It's discoveries like these that will help pave the way towards treatments that work. It's an essential step.
Considering the current "standard" of the TFI is one that is based entirely on subjectivity, how do you think implementing a test such as this one fits in? We can already determine that someone has or doesn't have tinnitus because the presence of phantom noise alone is what defines it.as it eliminates subjectiveness
If you can say person X has tinnitus of 45 dB and then offer treatment to them that lowers their tinnitus to say 35 dB, then this tells us objectively that the treatment Y used has worked with assisting lowering their tinnitus.Considering the current "standard" of the TFI is one that is based entirely on subjectivity, how do you think implementing a test such as this one fits in? We can already determine that someone has or doesn't have tinnitus because the presence of phantom noise alone is what defines it.
I guess my question really is "what does it mean to measure tinnitus objectively?" Does this mean the test is able to determine where in the brain you are encountering difficulties? Does it instead mean that you are instead gauging the severity? In that case, how likely is the possibility that results of the test may not be congruent with a patient's TFI? I'm sure people wont enjoy being told they don't have anything wrong or aren't suffering from problems that they certainly are.
Of course, I am not challenging this, the science behind it, and its potential benefits. I just would like to better understand how this fits in to the puzzle.
Ah, okay. Thank you! This helps clear it up a bit. I thought this was already accomplished through minimum masking level, but as that is subjective, there is certainly room for error.If you can say person X has tinnitus of 45 dB and then offer treatment to them that lowers their tinnitus to say 35 dB, then this tells us objectively that the treatment Y used has worked with assisting lowering their tinnitus.
This tends to look it will be much more accurate than minimum masking level and as a result shall end up giving better indications.I thought this was already accomplished through minimum masking level, but as that is subjective, there is certainly room for error.
So they weren't able to analyze your tinnitus?