I'm aware that ENT's don't have the greatest reputation on this Forum.
I went to one myself shortly after getting tinnitus & hyperacusis, about 6 months ago... and was definitely less than impressed.
However, 6 months later and my boss is so concerned about my condition that he used some contacts (his brother is a Doctor) and made an appointment on my behalf (without my knowledge), with a very highly regarded ENT. He is booked up until March... but my boss got me an appointment for January 7th.
I was a little apprehensive, but wasn't going to say 'no thanks', when he'd gone to all the trouble of setting it up. I mean... better having a boss who's concerned than one who doesn't care, I guess.
I Googled this ENT and he had an average rating of 3.9 out of 5.0 stars, from 33 patient reviews... with many saying he literally saved their lives. Only reason it wasn't higher was that a lot of them said he was abrupt and had no 'bedside manner'.
So anyway, I had the appointment yesterday and actually found him very good to deal with.
For whatever reason... he didn't even mention or ask about my tinnitus. He just concentrated on the hyperacusis... which was fine by me.
He looked at all my previous tests. Blood Test/Audiogram/CT Scan/MRI/Ultrasound.
Bottom line is, he is sending my back to the Audiologist to look at getting a White Noise Generator for my bad ear. I didn't have any specific problem with that. Although I asked him what would happen if I was walking along with this in and went past some kind of loud equipment? Would I still be able to put my finger in my ear or block my ear in some way, to protect it? He said no... as it would fit inside my ear, filling the ear cavity. But he said I wouldn't need to protect my ear in that instance anyway... as this device would detect the sound and cut it out or reduce it, somehow. So it sounds pretty hi-tech. I'm wondering if anyone has had experience with this style of device before?
However, the main reason I'm writing, is his overall view of hyperacusis... which is actually counter-intuitive to the way I have been dealing with it up to this point.
My approach so far has been to try and strike a balance between protecting and over-protecting. I always have ear plugs and Bose Noise-Cancelling Headphones at the ready, should either (or both) be required... which is pretty often. But on the other hand... I also consciously try to slowly increase exposure to normal everyday sounds when I can... to hopefully desensitize my hyperacusis. I take a lot of 'nature walks' to that end... where I don't use any protection. Unless I'm going past some obnoxiously loud birds or insects. Then I'll pop in an ear plug while passing them.
Anyway, the ENT said . . . NO EAR PLUGS!
He said I should obviously use protection for very loud sounds... but said I should not be protecting from everyday sounds... and that by using ear plugs during 'everyday life', I was making my hyperacusis worse.
He said that years ago... the advice would have been to use ear plugs... but that now they know better.
I said that if I couldn't use ear plugs... I would never be able to go into my kitchen again... as the sound and horrible distortion from plastic and plates and cutlery and sizzling food etc. would kill me!
He said that these 'normal' sounds won't cause any kind of damage... that the ear is very 'hardy'... and basically I just had to find a way to 'grin and bear it'.
I've noticed that protection vs. over-protection seems to be an ongoing debate in these parts... and I don't really want to open that whole can of worms... but unless anyone has some actual, factual, biological, medical, scientific proof that what he is saying is incorrect I'm guessing that maybe I should take his advice and consider this approach.
I went to one myself shortly after getting tinnitus & hyperacusis, about 6 months ago... and was definitely less than impressed.
However, 6 months later and my boss is so concerned about my condition that he used some contacts (his brother is a Doctor) and made an appointment on my behalf (without my knowledge), with a very highly regarded ENT. He is booked up until March... but my boss got me an appointment for January 7th.
I was a little apprehensive, but wasn't going to say 'no thanks', when he'd gone to all the trouble of setting it up. I mean... better having a boss who's concerned than one who doesn't care, I guess.
I Googled this ENT and he had an average rating of 3.9 out of 5.0 stars, from 33 patient reviews... with many saying he literally saved their lives. Only reason it wasn't higher was that a lot of them said he was abrupt and had no 'bedside manner'.
So anyway, I had the appointment yesterday and actually found him very good to deal with.
For whatever reason... he didn't even mention or ask about my tinnitus. He just concentrated on the hyperacusis... which was fine by me.
He looked at all my previous tests. Blood Test/Audiogram/CT Scan/MRI/Ultrasound.
Bottom line is, he is sending my back to the Audiologist to look at getting a White Noise Generator for my bad ear. I didn't have any specific problem with that. Although I asked him what would happen if I was walking along with this in and went past some kind of loud equipment? Would I still be able to put my finger in my ear or block my ear in some way, to protect it? He said no... as it would fit inside my ear, filling the ear cavity. But he said I wouldn't need to protect my ear in that instance anyway... as this device would detect the sound and cut it out or reduce it, somehow. So it sounds pretty hi-tech. I'm wondering if anyone has had experience with this style of device before?
However, the main reason I'm writing, is his overall view of hyperacusis... which is actually counter-intuitive to the way I have been dealing with it up to this point.
My approach so far has been to try and strike a balance between protecting and over-protecting. I always have ear plugs and Bose Noise-Cancelling Headphones at the ready, should either (or both) be required... which is pretty often. But on the other hand... I also consciously try to slowly increase exposure to normal everyday sounds when I can... to hopefully desensitize my hyperacusis. I take a lot of 'nature walks' to that end... where I don't use any protection. Unless I'm going past some obnoxiously loud birds or insects. Then I'll pop in an ear plug while passing them.
Anyway, the ENT said . . . NO EAR PLUGS!
He said I should obviously use protection for very loud sounds... but said I should not be protecting from everyday sounds... and that by using ear plugs during 'everyday life', I was making my hyperacusis worse.
He said that years ago... the advice would have been to use ear plugs... but that now they know better.
I said that if I couldn't use ear plugs... I would never be able to go into my kitchen again... as the sound and horrible distortion from plastic and plates and cutlery and sizzling food etc. would kill me!
He said that these 'normal' sounds won't cause any kind of damage... that the ear is very 'hardy'... and basically I just had to find a way to 'grin and bear it'.
I've noticed that protection vs. over-protection seems to be an ongoing debate in these parts... and I don't really want to open that whole can of worms... but unless anyone has some actual, factual, biological, medical, scientific proof that what he is saying is incorrect I'm guessing that maybe I should take his advice and consider this approach.