(................................lazy git..............)
.....ee's admitted it....look.....!!
(................................lazy git..............)
I am a bit perplexed about something after viewing the below:
What are you perplexed about, Star? Then maybe we can decide about Jazzer's video. -TC
Like you wrote I will die trying. And I do hope @Steve will be asked back, like he wrote above, to talk about tinnitus. I think he has a big impact in interviews.I got the call Sunday night to say the correspondent was going to another story, instead of me on Monday morning. They did say that they wanted to come back to it at some point so hopefully that happens.
I am unfortunately well aware that no matter what I say or how I put the message across, I will be framed by the editing room floor. We can try as much as we want but without complete control of the narrative the story that gets put together is someone else's view and suitable to their goals.
As David said, it's important to build trust, in exactly the way that we have with Tinnitus Talk and Hub. We didn't go in screaming at people and forcing the issue, that would have ended collaborations before they began; we developed links and trust over time. The news and media are not going to do exactly as we want, we have to try and shape the story and make them see the benefits and impact it will have, which may take some time and may never get to the place that many want it to.
"However, in the VAST majority of cases, people's tinnitus significantly reduces or disappears over time."
Well 2 things now - first, the business about tinnitus reducing or disappearing wasn't included in Catherine Jones' story. So we dodged the bullet on that one. They do say at the end that with proper treatment it can be manageable. Manage we do because we have no choice, and I feel safe saying that none of us would refuse an effective treatment if one existed. I wish they would emphasize that more in these clips. More research for a cure is needed. Is that so difficult?"However, in the VAST majority of cases, people's tinnitus significantly reduces or disappears over time."
This is true and some people are more awkward to get along with. I do enjoy some social interaction but being alone is bliss.When one is around other people, one must compromise, and one must make an effort (to be coherent when talking to them, to not upset them, etc). I prefer a life without compromises and I like being carefree (so whenever I can, I prefer to avoid exerting effort).
I like her voice and some of her advice and experience but I ALWAYS cringe when people or tinnitus organizations state:
(This was in the first four minutes of her video)
"However, in the VAST majority of cases, people's tinnitus significantly reduces or disappears over time."
When that old boy in the video sat on my front wall and told me his noise was terrible, unbearable, I didn't argue with him, I believed him.
I'm inclined towards waiting to see if there are any signs of life at 5News, like will they call Steve back.
I think Jazzer's story is too good to be sucked into some black hole in TV land.
Both ATA and BTA have now said that tinnitus significantly reduces or disappears over time in the VAST majority of cases.
I'm glad that others are following my example on here of questioning the information that the BTA provides. After I challenged the BTA's claim on its website that "the great majority of those with tinnitus are not affected by it at all" and asked them to produce the evidence to back up this claim, the BTA decided to withdraw it instead.@David
Both ATA and BTA have now said that tinnitus significantly reduces or disappears over time in the VAST majority of cases.
BTA made that statement in May 2018 on the Isobel video at 4:34. For your convenience the video is included above in Starthrower's post. ATA made a very similar statement several months later in connection with the movie, A Star Is Born.
ATA have never come back with the data to support it. Now it appears BTA were the first to say it.
What is the support for this statement BTA ? Thank you in advance for your response.
@TuxedoCat @Starthrower @Jazzer
things that are too important to be glossed over.
David C, there is s real problem here.Ensuring that the online information about tinnitus is accurate and reflects the true experience of tinnitus sufferers is one of the most important thing any of us can be doing. I hope that the BTA change or remove the "fading away" claim - and that other organisations follow their example.
Absolutely right @Jazzer. This myth of "fading" needs to be challenged (along with a lot of the other information the BTA relays). Habituation is learning to cope with tinnitus - not tinnitus just "fading away".David C, there is s real problem here.
Those of us with 'considerable' tinnitus know that it does not fade.
The fading aspect is a myth as far as I am concerned.
'Dave's Tinnitus Story' video, shows this aspect quite clearly.
I told the truth.
From one quarter in particular, I have been criticised for displaying some emotion, on film, which could drive somebody to do the unthinkable. (i.e. there's no hope.)
Yes, from my perspective, we can learn to cope with it better, through meditation etc... but are we supposed to portray the myth of fading to give some (false) hope??
I'd really like some advice here??
Just reading through and it makes me think that maybe we should produce a video as something that news outlets can use. I think we need to do some myth busting and get some facts out there, on the common misconceptions and things that can do harm (mainly from a community perspective).
Wouldn't it be nice if it was something that they could use when doing their research as a reference guide? Or as a short they could insert into a story? It could be a series of videos, things that are too important to be glossed over.
That's fascinating to hear about the study using the UK Biobank. Thank you for the work you do!Long message as I'll try and cover a few things at once.
So looking at the statement that tinnitus gets better. Over time it does appear that people's ability to manage/cope with tinnitus increases.
What evidence is there for this? Pretty much every RCT shows improvement in tinnitus through the ways that are available to measure it now – can all of these things work? There tends to be an improvement in the placebo/control groups, even when there is no active control. So what is happening here? This has been assessed roughly and most recently in a paper here; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28425615
There is other work that shows that people enter and leave the tinnitus population. Unfortunately this is unpublished. A large scale hearing study started in the 1980's showed a consistent tinnitus population over time but that the population changed, people entered and left that population continually. I can hear the cries at this being unpublished – I am frustrated it remains unpublished too.
I am working on a paper with others looking at what the UK Biobank tells us about the natural history of tinnitus. Hoping to have it completed within the month and may tell a different story still.
You can argue all of this is 'low level' evidence (most things in tinnitus are currently, frustratingly) but there's nothing else out there at the moment. I've not seen anything arguing the opposite?
I agree that medical and other professionals approaches to tinnitus are something that does need to be tackled. Where people are told 'there's nothing you can do,' (or variants of this) it is damaging, often increase stress levels and aren't accurate statements. Dismissive and unhelpful medical appointments cause unnecessary distress, are counterproductive, damaging and go against the Hippocratic oath of 'do no harm.'
All that said, there isn't a 'one size fits all,' or common experience of tinnitus. I believe everyone's experience of tinnitus is unique and the variety from person to person can be so large that it will never be possible to reach consensus on any statement regarding tinnitus. There will always be a counterview. Something we have to be aware of and sensitive to.
I don't believe the above then puts off research efforts or that people don't take tinnitus seriously as a result. Saying tinnitus improves doesn't mean that people living with it where it has improved wish it wasn't there anymore and many will still have it to a level where it is causing major distress. People learn ways to manage tinnitus or find ways to ameliorate the distress. This is helpful BUT doesn't detract from a search for a cure or the understanding of the need for one. Money speaks – investors/biotech, etc know there's a market out there and they will target it if they can. They are well aware of the potential market size and papers like the ones the BTA have produced on economics and current patient satisfaction with treatment all build the case and are seen as very useful to have this independently produced (i.e. not produced by the Biotech company pitching for money) when talking to investors.
I've just come back from the Association for Research in Otolaryngology conference. I met with several biotech companies and research groups to highlight the need for: a cure, better biomarkers, a tinnitus phenotype, etc. Tinnitus is on their radar and they are investing in it or monitoring the field. It was great to see some of the progress that has been made and hearing of their future plans. A lot of it overlaps with what the BTA is looking at so that is exciting – real opportunity for collaboration. I don't think you will hear much from what was presented at ARO as there was a ban on taking photos of slides or posters, as there was a lot of commercially sensitive and/or unpublished information presented. There is real progress being made though and each project is learning from one another both during and after trials succeed or fail.
My real passion within tinnitus research currently is looking at; how to subtype tinnitus and identifying biomarkers and objective measures, as I believe these are vital to moving the field forward (as I said in the video with Steve). I am working with a group utilising the UK Biobank to see how far the data within it can take us on this journey and what we might need to do if it doesn't fully answer the questions. There are other groups looking at these challenges from other perspectives too and I'm hoping to pull some of these together to share progress together in the future. We're (BTA) not doing a good job at communicating exactly what we're working on within this at the moment and it is something we need to improve.
I will check in and answer any queries but it won't be rapid, I'm out of the office a lot over the next month or so. Apologies for the long message but I realise this is a major issue for some so wanted to give some context – still unsure if this is enough!
So over time the majority of - though by no means all - people with subjective tinnitus have an increasing ability to cope. But that's a completely different thing from saying that the tinnitus sound itself "fades" over time. Sufferers can find strategies for coping with the noise of tinnitus without the noise itself going away or fading.Long message as I'll try and cover a few things at once.
So looking at the statement that tinnitus gets better. Over time it does appear that people's ability to manage/cope with tinnitus increases.
Where has the BTA claimed that it fades? I'm not saying they have or they haven't, but this seems to stem from a video that was made independently by Isobel. Correct me if I'm wrong.But that's a completely different thing from saying that the tinnitus sound itself "fades" over time. Sufferers can find strategies for coping with the noise of tinnitus without the noise itself going away or fading.
What we need to check is how robust is the evidence for this claim of the tinnitus sound "fading"? How many sufferers have reported that - and what was the terminology that they used? At the moment the very limited evidence I have seen doesn't justify the claims of "fading" tinnitus which the BTA is making.