Evidence of Mobile Applications in Otolaryngology Targeted at Patients
Editorial to accompany publication of AOR-20-0321.R1—Mobile applications in otolaryngology: a systematic review of the literature, apple app store, and the google play store
Trecca, Eleonora; Lonigro, Antonio; Gelardi, Matteo; Kim, Brandon; Cassano, Michele.
Mobile technology is increasingly used in healthcare ("mobile health") and will continue to transform the field significantly. Already, numerous mobile applications (apps) are available. Many mobile apps have been developed to serve as reference tools for healthcare professionals including otolaryngologists, but the vast majority of mobile apps are targeted directly at patients. These apps offer everything from tracking and monitoring of the patient's own health data, communication with the patient's healthcare provider, to self-diagnosis and even treatment. In this largely unregulated field, clinicians will increasingly encounter patients who have used mobile apps.
In this issue of
Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, Trecca et al present "Mobile applications in otolaryngology: a systematic review of the literature, apple app store, and the google play store." In their review, they map both the current landscape of otolaryngology mobile apps targeted at patients by searching major mobile app stores as well as the supporting evidence for these mobile apps in the published scientific literature. They further appraise the quality of these mobile apps using an established mobile app rating scale (MARS) that considers engagement, functionality, esthetics, and information. The authors found just over a thousand mobile apps within otolaryngology that include for example audiometry, tinnitus management, posturography, sleep recording and analysis, and allergy symptom logbooks.
In contrast to the plethora of available apps, the literature search yielded <200 relevant papers on mobile apps in otolaryngology with only 33 studies aimed at validating specific mobile apps. There is an apparent discrepancy between the number of mobile apps in our field and their scientific support. The authors found many apps of questionable quality and few were developed in collaboration with healthcare professionals. Many of the most popular apps are free and are easier to find because of the many reviews and downloads in contrast to the few scientifically validated apps. The authors emphasize that FDA regulations can be circumvented if the app is categorized as a "lifestyle" app instead of a "medical" app.
Mobile apps have the potential to reach an extensive number of patients, however, a critical approach to the information and results presented by most of these apps is needed. As highlighted by this review, mobile health in otolaryngology—especially mobile apps targeted at patients—requires much more research. As clinicians, we will need up-to-date knowledge on mobile apps in our field to have educated conversations with our patients. This systematic review serves as an excellent point of reference and also provides an overview of which mobile apps have some degree of validity.
Source:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0003489420951113