University of Minnesota Tinnitus Research with Acoustic and Body Stimulation

Do you think it would be feasible to give everyone suffering from tinnitus to the point where it affects their lives the attention you were given?

It might be a lot of effort but it's something that may work for many. Especially when you look at what tinnitus has driven some people to do.
That is what is so disappointing. This device is not further developed as far as I know, and why couldn´t Dr. Lim incorporate the EEG stuff into the timing on the Lenire device?

Something is just wrong in the whole scheme of things when it comes to helping us with this condition.
 
That is what is so disappointing. This device is not further developed as far as I know, and why couldn´t Dr. Lim incorporate the EEG stuff into the timing on the Lenire device?

Something is just wrong in the whole scheme of things when it comes to helping us with this condition.
I suspect that by "buying" Lim's time and luring him in commercially, Neuromod has done a disservice to the tinnitus population. I mean, at least Minnesota was based on an EEG and other tests, all Neuromod requires is a hearing test up to 8 kHz and then some questions. How can you customize the treatment effectively based on such blunt information? It is a pity, and more than a pity, and worse than a pity, that Lim dropped that device and that it is now getting dust in some lab shelves. My gut feeling is that it could help so many people even though there is no way to prove it.
 
Are you sure this device isn't being worked on anymore? That would be terrible news if true.
Yes, I'm sure sadly.
That is what is so disappointing. This device is not further developed as far as I know, and why couldn´t Dr. Lim incorporate the EEG stuff into the timing on the Lenire device?

Something is just wrong in the whole scheme of things when it comes to helping us with this condition.
It's so bizarre. They literally cured someone who had tinnitus from birth! How can you possibly abandon that? Is there any other record of a person who was cured from chronic tinnitus? I understand @kelpiemsp is one person and we don't know how it went for others in the trial but curing someone with tinnitus from birth seems to be a great fucking starting point to build off of, not stop the project and leave to work for the Walmart version of your device. Susan Shore's trial results can't come fast enough.
 
My understanding was that Lim working for Neuromod meant he might be able to get to help with Lenire 2.0. it is a shame this isn't being worked on though.
 
Hard to say. Not sure it matters. If I try really hard and plug my ears and focus and think, I can hear a sound. But I'd rather not. From a practical perspective, I don't hear it for weeks at a time.
I think I love you.

FWIW, Lim is still listed on the UMinn website as the director of the SONIC research lab. Hope springs eternal! That said, he's also listed as a paid schill of Neuromod.
 
So is it a fair summary of a situation that Dr. Lim felt building his own commercial device would be too big of barrier, so he joined up with the Neuro of people since they already had a similar device, and we're hoping that the result is a revision to the Lenire device that makes it actually work?
 
I sent Lim an email about 18 months ago with a few general questions about tinnitus and hopes of treatment. He sent me a long and detailed reply. He clearly spent some time writing me back. I may have to send another email just to see if I can get a response again. Curious why this is dead in the water. Wondering what role Neuromod had in that.

We may never know, but I'd really like to find out if anyone else in this study had the success @kelpiemsp had. Maybe I don't actually. Either many were helped and it's never commercially available or he's the extreme outlier and it's not this effective for the masses.
 
I sent Lim an email about 18 months ago with a few general questions about tinnitus and hopes of treatment. He sent me a long and detailed reply. He clearly spent some time writing me back. I may have to send another email just to see if I can get a response again. Curious why this is dead in the water. Wondering what role Neuromod had in that.

We may never know, but I'd really like to find out if anyone else in this study had the success @kelpiemsp had. Maybe I don't actually. Either many were helped and it's never commercially available or he's the extreme outlier and it's not this effective for the masses.
So is Lim now working with Neuromod to try to resolve their Lenire troubles/make it much more effective?
 
I sent Lim an email about 18 months ago with a few general questions about tinnitus and hopes of treatment. He sent me a long and detailed reply. He clearly spent some time writing me back. I may have to send another email just to see if I can get a response again. Curious why this is dead in the water. Wondering what role Neuromod had in that.

We may never know, but I'd really like to find out if anyone else in this study had the success @kelpiemsp had. Maybe I don't actually. Either many were helped and it's never commercially available or he's the extreme outlier and it's not this effective for the masses.
I was thinking of doing exactly the same at this point. Maybe we can all pen something together so as to feed in various points?
 
So is it a fair summary of a situation that Dr. Lim felt building his own commercial device would be too big of barrier, so he joined up with the Neuro of people since they already had a similar device, and we're hoping that the result is a revision to the Lenire device that makes it actually work?
I think unfortunately all we can do is speculate but from what I understand the university based teams are research only and tenured, whereas of course Neuromod is a commercial venture with investors that want to see a return. Lim hopping from UMinn to Neuromod does leave one to wonder about his motives, especially as the UMinn tinnitus research now seems dead in the water but I think the biggest current issue with Lenire is the lack of personalised timing data that was clearly such an important part of the UMinn research. We've been saying for months that we believe Neuromod should find a way to personalise Lenire's timing data. The fact that Lim is advising them, has already demonstrated a device with personalised timing data effectively cured one of our members and yet Lenire continues to be a sort of one size fits all, is a real head scratcher. More questions than answers.
 
So is it a fair summary of a situation that Dr. Lim felt building his own commercial device would be too big of barrier, so he joined up with the Neuro of people since they already had a similar device, and we're hoping that the result is a revision to the Lenire device that makes it actually work?
After I added my post yesterday, I e-mailed Dr. Lim via his UMinn address. To my great surprise, he replied within 20 minutes - he's either really efficient or he doesn't have much work on ;).

His reply was pretty much exactly the same as your thoughts. I don't think I'm being unfair or unreasonable in copying his response below;

That is correct that I have joined together with Neuromod. The main reason is that there are many opportunities both sides could help each other advance the tinnitus treatment with bimodal neuromodulation, and I felt it would be the quickest as well as broader reaching opportunity to help the tinnitus community (i.e., it is challenging for an academic like me or any university professor to move a new treatment to patients on a large scale; you really need a reasonably established company infrastructure to do that in a "decent" time frame). Since I started to collaborate with them, we have been combining great ideas and solutions into the Lenire treatment. I wouldn't view the collaboration as the Minnesota approach taking a back seat but actually the opposite. Many of the things I have learned from my own research, I am pursuing in different ways to integrate into the Lenire device. As you can imagine, the process is very slow because of all of the regulatory and clinical requirements to get new products to the market. We recently performed another large scale study investigating different parameters, in which you can find the protocol paper on the Neuromod Devices website (called TENT-A2 study). We are still analyzing and closing out the huge dataset but there are encouraging results and discoveries from that TENT-A2 study that we are leveraging to guide the Lenire treatment. It takes quite a bit of time to close out and analyze the extensive data from both TENT-A1 and TENT-A2 studies, but we are getting close to publishing the results in a series of papers where the first paper will come out soon, with the other papers following afterwards.
I do want to assure you that we are trying our best to integrate the positive discoveries we are making from these large scale clinical studies as well as from other relevant research and collaborative ideas into the Lenire treatment.'
 
I see where he's coming from, but I would counter that his way of doing things seemed to be better than Lenire, and by trying to guide Lenire with an inferior device setup, he might improve it somewhat, but still not be able to help as much as his own devices could.
 
Hard to say. Not sure it matters. If I try really hard and plug my ears and focus and think, I can hear a sound. But I'd rather not. From a practical perspective, I don't hear it for weeks at a time.
Hi, @kelpiemsp. Thanks for the insight you're providing. I could've sworn I read a post of yours a while ago that said you had reactive tinnitus. Is this the case? If so, did this improve along with your "normal" tinnitus?
 
his way of doing things seemed to be better than Lenire
At the same time, Lim's idea of changing parameters in midstream seems to have been the root cause of the majority of the disimprovement. I'm having a hard time reconciling the seeming superiority of the Minnesota device and it backfiring with Lenire in part due to Lim's ideas for improvement. I mean, I'd like to absolve Lim of blame here and wish he could restart the Minnesota device but I'm not sure it's justified. It's almost like he just got lucky with Minnesota.

Beyond that, his statement implies that there will indeed be Lenire firmware updates. I guess that plus the eventual peer review is something worth checking back on to reassess but the burden of proof is definitely on Neuromod now.
 
After I added my post yesterday, I e-mailed Dr. Lim via his UMinn address. To my great surprise, he replied within 20 minutes - he's either really efficient or he doesn't have much work on ;).

His reply was pretty much exactly the same as your thoughts. I don't think I'm being unfair or unreasonable in copying his response below;

That is correct that I have joined together with Neuromod. The main reason is that there are many opportunities both sides could help each other advance the tinnitus treatment with bimodal neuromodulation, and I felt it would be the quickest as well as broader reaching opportunity to help the tinnitus community (i.e., it is challenging for an academic like me or any university professor to move a new treatment to patients on a large scale; you really need a reasonably established company infrastructure to do that in a "decent" time frame). Since I started to collaborate with them, we have been combining great ideas and solutions into the Lenire treatment. I wouldn't view the collaboration as the Minnesota approach taking a back seat but actually the opposite. Many of the things I have learned from my own research, I am pursuing in different ways to integrate into the Lenire device. As you can imagine, the process is very slow because of all of the regulatory and clinical requirements to get new products to the market. We recently performed another large scale study investigating different parameters, in which you can find the protocol paper on the Neuromod Devices website (called TENT-A2 study). We are still analyzing and closing out the huge dataset but there are encouraging results and discoveries from that TENT-A2 study that we are leveraging to guide the Lenire treatment. It takes quite a bit of time to close out and analyze the extensive data from both TENT-A1 and TENT-A2 studies, but we are getting close to publishing the results in a series of papers where the first paper will come out soon, with the other papers following afterwards.
I do want to assure you that we are trying our best to integrate the positive discoveries we are making from these large scale clinical studies as well as from other relevant research and collaborative ideas into the Lenire treatment.'
Thanks for sharing mate.
 
At the same time, Lim's idea of changing parameters in midstream seems to have been the root cause of the majority of the disimprovement. I'm having a hard time reconciling the seeming superiority of the Minnesota device and it backfiring with Lenire in part due to Lim's ideas for improvement. I mean, I'd like to absolve Lim of blame here and wish he could restart the Minnesota device but I'm not sure it's justified. It's almost like he just got lucky
Pretty sure Lim didn't join Neuromod until after the TENT-A2 trial was complete and he was only analyzing the data and giving presentations about Lenire in the US.
 
Honestly Hubert Lim should just drop Lenire like a hot sack of potatoes and stick with the Minnesota device.
Question is whether Hubert Lim actually thought Lenire was going to be better or alternatively whether he joined Neuromod to simply make a quick buck?

Basically I wouldn't be surprised if he joined them for the latter reason as at this point in time I think that the Minnesota device wouldn't even be released due to the requirements around university projects being much more stringent and also actually needing to get this through the much tougher FDA process.

Hope I am wrong though.
 
Question is whether Hubert Lim actually thought Lenire was going to be better or alternatively whether he joined Neuromod to simply make a quick buck?

Basically I wouldn't be surprised if he joined them for the latter reason as at this point in time I think that the Minnesota device wouldn't even be released due to the requirements around university projects being much more stringent and also actually needing to get this through the much tougher FDA process.

Hope I am wrong though.
It would be a tragic waste and a disappointment to humanity to abandon a successful project in the name of a quick buck. I don't see Lenire going anywhere but, I hope I'm wrong. It would really sad to see actual successful treatment like this thrown to wayside over money or regulations. It's situations like this that the creators of treatments should persist and push harder for the good of everyone they're trying to help.
 
Question is whether Hubert Lim actually thought Lenire was going to be better or alternatively whether he joined Neuromod to simply make a quick buck?

Basically I wouldn't be surprised if he joined them for the latter reason as at this point in time I think that the Minnesota device wouldn't even be released due to the requirements around university projects being much more stringent and also actually needing to get this through the much tougher FDA process.

Hope I am wrong though.
He's probably getting a ton of cash and can convince himself Lenire gives him the ability to reach a broader audience than he could alone, presumably by implementing aspects of his device into a gen II Lenire product. It's likely the broader reach thing is true if he lacks business acumen, albeit it will take a lot longer for us sufferers.

If he wanted to be a true humanitarian he could just open source everything about his product, like Jonas Salk refusing to patent the polio vaccine, but he didn't and so we get fucked over once more. I'm sure it won't be the last time.
 
He's probably getting a ton of cash and can convince himself Lenire gives him the ability to reach a broader audience than he could alone, presumably by implementing aspects of his device into a gen II Lenire product. It's likely the broader reach thing is true if he lacks business acumen, albeit it will take a lot longer for us sufferers.

If he wanted to be a true humanitarian he could just open source everything about his product, like Jonas Salk refusing to patent the polio vaccine, but he didn't and so we get fucked over once more. I'm sure it won't be the last time.
I agree and actually am of the opinion that Dr. Shore's device will be better because it is firstly going to have the signals patented so they can only be used with her device and secondly she seems to be trying to produce a device that will truly assist us and actually allow people to get comprehensive benefit from it.

I think that the reason we see so much apathy and also actual disdain towards, for example, Frequency Therapeutics, is because they are outsiders disrupting the status quo and attempting to offer proper treatment. Lenire on the other hand has happened to be able to get by with the limited device they have made because it is not going to disrupt the norm and it is in no way a threat. I think that there is likely to be a similar story with Otonomy's medicines if they are successful.

This is the same story that we have seen with these supposed health products time and time again like massagers and pillows which barely live up to the therapeutic claims that they try and say they offer. There is a reason that drugs get better results lol.
 
I agree and actually am of the opinion that Dr. Shore's device will be better because it is firstly going to have the signals patented so they can only be used with her device
You do know that in the context of the UofM device the timings were actually specified exactly for the patient via EEG, right?
 
He's probably getting a ton of cash and can convince himself Lenire gives him the ability to reach a broader audience than he could alone, presumably by implementing aspects of his device into a gen II Lenire product. It's likely the broader reach thing is true if he lacks business acumen, albeit it will take a lot longer for us sufferers.

If he wanted to be a true humanitarian he could just open source everything about his product, like Jonas Salk refusing to patent the polio vaccine, but he didn't and so we get fucked over once more. I'm sure it won't be the last time.
Agreed. If he did open source everything we'd all be free. It just goes to show you that cash is king and most people will not help others without it. In an ideal world it would be better for more people especially those with abilities to be like Jonas Salk. Some people won't understand that until they are in a similar position and need to reach out for help and the only answer they receive back we could help but that'll be 5 billion dollars, too bad, so sad, live with it. I understand things need funding and other things just take time but after suffering for 10+ years, if it was me I'd make damn sure everyone received the best treatment as quick as possible and at little to no cost (I'm aware that I'd need investors, supporters, etc and would need to keep them happy but I'd fight for every micrometer in favor of helping people).
 
That may have been but it actually doesn't have any influence and relevance to the comparison between Shore's device and Lenire.
Well if Lim is aware of the offsets among the population, it means he would have access to knowledge on timings not yet available to Shore. So it actually is very relevant...
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now