Sure I learned quite a few things. First, all the people in the trial are not starting at the same time, and they are confident enough in the outcomes that they have already started developing the device to take home. The participants of this trial will be eligible for the final trial, where they will take home the device to use. This should begin in early 2019. The device is like a hearing aid but works similarly to Shore's device. I learned that Shore's research is actually based off the animal findings done here at the UofM (Minnesota) and she is targeting the DCN whereas they are targeting the inferior ...something I don't remember. I also had an extended hearing frequency test done, so the device broadcasts tones customized to my hearing thresholds. It was extended both above and below. I had no hearing loss at all up to 12khz and down to 125hz I think. They mentioned some postulate the degree of the slope between frequencies rather than the sheer amount of loss was a greater predictor of tinnitus. I.E. if you had a lot of loss but it was slowly over many frequencies you are less likely to have tinnitus. The Graduate student I spoke with had tinnitus and was pursuing an audiology Ph.D. They mentioned they had just finished a paper which showed gabapentin as a successful treatment (mildly), and that there would be a major paper published shortly about the findings of the device I am trialing in Europe at some point in 2018.
The actual testing on the first day was sheer hell. I whipped out my phone and measured the sound booth at 10 db, and then had to put in ear plugs and sit there for 10 minutes. OMG. Then I had to measure loudness again after the silence. Then was the hearing test, then was the somatic tinnitus test and personal interview. All in a soundproof booth below 10 dB! I think I learned why people tell you to focus on your T, after hearing it soooo loud for an hour, it was nearly impossible to hear it in the real world. It was weird.
Hope is on the way T sufferers. Hang in there!
@kelpiemsp Thank you so very much for the updates, as others wrote it really gives some hope.
I see that you wrote that those participating in the current trial (such as yourself) will be eligible for participation in the next trial. But, do you know whether they will also be recruiting entirely new volunteers for the next trial? Will it be a Phase-III style large-scale trial?
I ask because I'm originally from Minneapolis and my parents still live there and it may be worth it for me to move back temporarily to participate. I would go for the current trial, but I'm guessing it's probably too late at this point, also I'd like to hear about the results (hopefully good!!) of the current trial before moving back to MN for treatment as I'd probably have to give up my apartment and job where I am now, or else constantly travel back and forth
But, if the only way to get in at all is to participate now, I'd try to get in now (if it's not already too late of course).
Thank you!It will be a phase 3. I do not know the size. They will start recruiting towards the end of 2018. I will provide updates as I totally plan on being apart of that. You may still be able to get in. One member on here @Tripstan I believe got in just a few weeks ago. But things are pretty slow at this point.
I'll come out and ask the golden question. Do these guys plan on releasing a tinnitus device? And if so, when do they think it will be on the market?It will be a phase 3. I do not know the size. They will start recruiting towards the end of 2018. I will provide updates as I totally plan on being apart of that. You may still be able to get in. One member on here @Tripstan I believe got in just a few weeks ago. But things are pretty slow at this point.
I'll come out and ask the golden question. Do these guys plan on releasing a tinnitus device? And if so, when do they think it will be on the market?
@kelpiemsp This is interesting.
"I think the most exciting this is that this device will stimulate a different nerve. Which ultimately means, another pathway, and another option. Shore's device may work better for certain types of T, and this may work better for others. Since Shore's is using the DCN and this is using the inferior colliculus."
The inferior colliculus neurons has somatosensory influence. What confuses me is that Susan Shore talked a lot about this method back in 2009. The Encyclopedia of Neuroscience has several articles about this with her stamp on it.
Did it actually help you? How? Did they actually say it's meant to be used daily then weekly then monthly until it disappears? Quite a statement that I will hold onto cautiously.
You are doing god's work by updating us.I haven't started the active parameters of the trial. I don't believe I have ever commented on how it affects my T. As far as using daily, weekly, monthly that is an example. They described it in similar terms, but that is how neural plasticity works. You are effectively exercising the brain.
When comparing the UofMinnesota to the UofMichigan is that Michigan didn't have a real control. Namely, many researchers have called out the UofMichigan study somewhat since the study design doesn't accurately account for placebos. I guess if you have actually used the device, it is still obvious if you are getting the treatment or the control. He didn't say that it was "bad" just that the real effects aren't quite as apparent as the research suggests.
I think the real competition is who can get to market first.Let the competition begin! Best way they can come out of this situation is prove that they are the best. However, the first one to the market will undoubtedly make tons of money.
Sir could you repeat please I didn't understand very well ... Frequency will what ?Novartis will fail because gene therapy is a expensive complicated and ineffective way to regenerate hair cells
Frequency will fail not because they failed to regenerate hair cells but because they cannot navigate the the cochlea using their gel, unlike Novartis which uses a virus to do so.
The FDA will fail both trials
That's free market competition at work racing to help desperate people in need.
This. If that is true then these devices are the miracle we need.It doesn't matter at all what caused the tinnitus.
You are doing god's work by updating us.
btw how long does the phase-II last?
This can depend on cooperation of spinal nerves and the numbered cranial nerves for the amount of time of less T when the physical neck is involved. When one hears cracking within the neck, it's related to the discs, the hard structure. So when this happens, correction to the spine itself must be made first and any disease must also be addressed. Then severe muscle spasms that has relation to lordosis would be much less if not eliminated. Then there need for discussion on damaged or twisted nerves. I'm not talking about what Susan Shore has said per the DCN which I have quoted here, I'm referring to disease that can be increased from trauma (physical structure) of the c spine or from aging. Forty percent of the time in these situations there's no hearing loss, but there is T.
Sure I learned quite a few things. First, all the people in the trial are not starting at the same time, and they are confident enough in the outcomes that they have already started developing the device to take home. The participants of this trial will be eligible for the final trial, where they will take home the device to use. This should begin in early 2019. The device is like a hearing aid but works similarly to Shore's device. I learned that Shore's research is actually based off the animal findings done here at the UofM (Minnesota) and she is targeting the DCN whereas they are targeting the inferior ...something I don't remember. I also had an extended hearing frequency test done, so the device broadcasts tones customized to my hearing thresholds. It was extended both above and below. I had no hearing loss at all up to 12khz and down to 125hz I think. They mentioned some postulate the degree of the slope between frequencies rather than the sheer amount of loss was a greater predictor of tinnitus. I.E. if you had a lot of loss but it was slowly over many frequencies you are less likely to have tinnitus. The Graduate student I spoke with had tinnitus and was pursuing an audiology Ph.D. They mentioned they had just finished a paper which showed gabapentin as a successful treatment (mildly), and that there would be a major paper published shortly about the findings of the device I am trialing in Europe at some point in 2018.
The actual testing on the first day was sheer hell. I whipped out my phone and measured the sound booth at 10 db, and then had to put in ear plugs and sit there for 10 minutes. OMG. Then I had to measure loudness again after the silence. Then was the hearing test, then was the somatic tinnitus test and personal interview. All in a soundproof booth below 10 dB! I think I learned why people tell you to focus on your T, after hearing it soooo loud for an hour, it was nearly impossible to hear it in the real world. It was weird.
Hope is on the way T sufferers. Hang in there!
@kelpiemsp thank you so much for the updates! I am from Minnesota and I am wondering if there is anyway I could contact someone to possibly see if I could get into that study?