The scientific method is good but is it always leading to truth?
It ensures that you don't believe in something that, given all of the latest evidence, is demonstratively wrong.
To quote Richard Feynman
"Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees of certainty — some most unsure, some nearly sure, but none absolutely certain."
I didn't say that evolution must be true. I pointed out that it is not as unlikely as you said it is (DNA knowing biology and physics and using that knowledge to design organisms is certainly unlikely; but the process of evolution has been shown to produce incredibly complex structures, and so evolution is a reasonable guess).
I think that whether or not the process of evolution is true is completely irrelevant. If it is proved that evolution has nothing to do with the origin of species, I will stop believing in evolution, but I will NOT start believing in competitive explanations that still don't have any compelling evidence to support them, and that fail Occam's razor.
They don't seem to let science and religion be a problem with their faith, as shown in this detail list of famous names from different eras.
One problem is that children are being indoctrinated. Evidently, for some people the consequences can last a lifetime. In a sane world it would be a crime to try to recruit children into cults or religions. I guess those scientists abandon the scientific method when they choose to have faith.
How do you explain a boy who would meet long dead relatives before the boy's birth? How do you explain the story of this well educated, non-religious (prior to NDE) lady surgeon MD? Her story was actually told in CNN by investigative journalists in the program AC360. What was told in that long interview that is not in the first short video below totally amazed me, that while she was there on the other realm she was told her time wasn't up but that her 18 year old would soon be called home. She came back to life telling this to her husband and they decided to not tell their son about this to frighten him. He would live life as he would enjoy it and unfortunately he was lost subsequently in a tragic accident.
People have an incentive to make up those stories. But this can still have a rational explanation, even if those people were telling the truth. Over the past 50 years, thousands (hundreds of thousands?) of people have had near death experiences. Many of them had hallucinations that involved predictions. We would expect that a tiny fraction of those predictions would actually end up being true, by chance alone. This is what the statisticians call "censored data" - you hear about the handful of people whose predictions came true, but you don't hear about the hundreds of thousands whose predictions didn't come true.
I simply can't think this type of NDE is as a result of brain hallucination.
I have never taken any drugs. But I heard Joe Rogan mentioned "spiritual experiences" as a result of taking the drug DMT. Check out
http://www.collective-evolution.com...known-to-man-your-brain-produces-it-everyday/
"For most, there are no words accurate enough to describe what happens when you experience the hyper-space reality of a DMT trip. It's called the "
Spirit Molecule" by many of our greatest thinkers, an oxymoron when really considered. This is because
DMT is said by many to be the portal to what we know as the 'afterlife', a realm built of light fractals and sacred geometry, where time and 3D space merge, and where we are brought into contact with 'them'."
"During Dr. Rick Strassman's infamous human-DMT studies in the 1990s, about half of all participants reported making contact with strange entities or beings. Some people described them as "helpers", "guides", or "aliens", Terrence McKenna coined them as "machine elves". Nevertheless, however the participants described these beings, there was a commonality among their experiences. These beings had been '
waiting' for the participants, with much to show them in a limited amount of time."
"Strassman said he immediately flocked to the biological explanation, that the brain was firing up some sort of wakeful dream experience. Yet, the participants refused to accept his conjecture."
They might have refused to accept that conjecture, but knowing that a drug can replicate what people feel during NDE, makes me more inclined to believe his conjecture.
DMA is not the only drug that can have that impact on the brain:
http://extraordinaryintelligence.com/psychedelic-drugs-hallucinations-or-hightened-consciousness/