This October will mark the 4th year since I was diagnosed with hyperacusis by an audiologist I found on the "TRT Worldwide List of Clinicians" on the Hyperacusis Network forum.
From early 2014 to mid 2016 I listened to pink noise from two different sources in my room for nearly 16 hours each day, in addition to having my window open much of the time to listen to the sounds outside and listening to music and sound from movies from time to time. The pink noise was the CD I ordered from the Hyperacusis network back in 2012.
I saw improvement during this time, but I wasn't sure if it was from the ativan I started taking in early 2014 or because of actual improvement. Lo and behold, as soon as I attempted to taper from ativan, my symptoms hit me back in full force and my ears not only felt like they did in 2013, but worse. I reinstated on ativan due to a severe withdrawal reaction, but my symptoms did not recover fully. I am planning to do a slow taper from valium and I'm worried my T and H are going to worsen during the process and the extreme hyperacusis and ear pain will return.
My question is, if broadband noise is effective in treating hyperacusis, why didn't listening to so much broadband noise over a period of 2 and a half years actually improve my hyperacusis? Why does the Hyperacusis Network talk about TRT like it is the holy grail of hyperacusis when there are people who receive no benefit from broadband noise?
As of now I cannot tolerate the grating sound of broad band noise for very long, so I've halted my "treatment" but I still keep the window open from time to time at night to hear the soft sounds of the outdoors. I stop listening to sound when I cannot tolerate it for longer.
From early 2014 to mid 2016 I listened to pink noise from two different sources in my room for nearly 16 hours each day, in addition to having my window open much of the time to listen to the sounds outside and listening to music and sound from movies from time to time. The pink noise was the CD I ordered from the Hyperacusis network back in 2012.
I saw improvement during this time, but I wasn't sure if it was from the ativan I started taking in early 2014 or because of actual improvement. Lo and behold, as soon as I attempted to taper from ativan, my symptoms hit me back in full force and my ears not only felt like they did in 2013, but worse. I reinstated on ativan due to a severe withdrawal reaction, but my symptoms did not recover fully. I am planning to do a slow taper from valium and I'm worried my T and H are going to worsen during the process and the extreme hyperacusis and ear pain will return.
My question is, if broadband noise is effective in treating hyperacusis, why didn't listening to so much broadband noise over a period of 2 and a half years actually improve my hyperacusis? Why does the Hyperacusis Network talk about TRT like it is the holy grail of hyperacusis when there are people who receive no benefit from broadband noise?
As of now I cannot tolerate the grating sound of broad band noise for very long, so I've halted my "treatment" but I still keep the window open from time to time at night to hear the soft sounds of the outdoors. I stop listening to sound when I cannot tolerate it for longer.