Recent content by Sjoerd

@RicoS what tVNS device are you using?

nice....really nice!

Funny thing Joe. If I would go out for a night in the club and not wear earplugs it is extremely likely that god wants to "talk" to me for a while. And if I wear earplugs god does not want to "talk" to me. I can do this experiment like a million times and I would bet god would want to talk to me...

Is this topic still active.......:rockingbanana:. Just watch some religious guy get "murder" buy Lawrence Krauss. I can feel the frustration of prof Krauss.

I'm a strong believer in serendipity....so you do not really "need" to know the cause to get a treatment. History is full of inventions/discoveries that where made more or less as an happy accident. Read this artical: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3508154/

You do not listen to white noise in this treatment.....

Well, that is hardly a state that has any real meaning. basically it is a one year old prediction that it could be possible. This is by no means a press release about a commercial release of the product this month. The study is not officially finisched.......just do not jump to...

Any source on that?

Uhm....lets see the results. I support them....about 10 whooping euro's a month....:D. Still would like to see the results.

The sad thing about research, like that of Kilgard with VNS, you might end up being wrong completely. To me that does not equal "money wasted".

No actual results have been released....we have to wait. The resuls from @labrat10687 are dissapointing. But calling the research a bunch of asses that are just filling their pockets is way way over the line.

How do you know that you had the real therapy? This is the bad thing about research....you might just end up being wrong. To bad!

@labrat10687 , that just sucks. I admire you for trying. Any idea when they are going to release the results? Any idea when they are going to tell you if you had the therapy or the sham-therapy?

It has been offline for some reason....it is a shame. Your video seems like a summary of that presentation (I will watch it tonight).

Of course it will influence the MML (or at least we must assume that it will). We know that expensive placebo's are more effective than cheap placebo's. It is safe to assume that sharing results will offset the data. For that reason alone it is wise to not speak about it. So thumbs-up for...