Sorry I should have said I haven't timed how long the residual inhibition lasts because I don't like checking for my tinnitus but I have been these last 3 days just out of curiosity. However I think the RI lasts minutes maybe even 10 mins
Hi Aisling,Hi guys
Just wanted to let you know I am also on the trial. Steve did you tell them about the thing with your speech. I will keep everyone updated with my experience.
My first patient, I will be happy to operate. All you need is an Mp3 player and earphones that are comfortable to use. I reckon that by mid June I should have all the info I need.
I understand and I can appreciate that, I've not long since finished reading Ben Goldacre's book 'Bad Pharma' that gives a great insight into the whole medical system - more on the drugs side than this sort of treatment, well worth a read if you haven't already. This technique though is devised from electrical brain stimulation for a parkinsons treatment so a lot of the leg work was already done for them. They took the theory and replaced electrical stimulation with acoustic stimulation. It is extremely expensive to test and bring a treatment to market and it also doesn't help that the consultants have such a high hourly rate. This device does seem a bit rushed though, I mean it's on sale when they don't have a reliable study yet, the people who are paying for it are essentially still guinea pigs. I don't begrudge a company a profit but £4.5k is pretty steep considering the simplicity of the theory and system (well, not simple, but borrowing from established research on neuroplasticity, neuromodulation and tonotopic organisation).I don't believe in 'What's meant to be' etc I'm afraid Aisling and the trial I'm on is just a simple study by a PHD student for her project, nothing with the resources behind it that the ANM trial has.
I've never heard of anyone having a T pitch as low as 200hz.
Steve - its the Research that cost them the money and what people are paying for, not just the actual MP3 player.
@Louise Ah well, on the bright side I'll be able to copy the therapy for you. With all the data on here and from the trial so far I think I should be able to pretty much replicate the process.
I agree, it is good that they are doing the research, I wouldn't even like to think of how much it's costing them to do it. It could be delivered a lot cheaper though by attending any normal audiologist for pitch matching and setting the tone levels, then downloading a tone pattern for an Mp3 player or using an app / program that generates the tone from a website.
They are making the therapy a much higher cost by having a proprietary device that is useless without them re-configuring / supporting it. I personally think they are being greedy. If they made it cheaper they could have potentially made a lot of money by getting approval to train audiologists and deliver it on the NHS and other healthcare systems - if the trial shows it to be effective of course.
Assomeone who paid at The Harley St Clinic (didnt work for me ) can Ipass a comment.
You have to admire their "Balls" for getting Involved In a trial. I cannot say how many units they are selling obviously I do not know,but there were allways people there when I went.So talk about make or break,If this trial fails thats basically the end of thier business model.This Harley st practice is a private business with I think 2 directors.Yes they sell hearing aids etc but I think acrn is there main thrust.