@Tanni, I appreciate your openness. You seem to be able to step outside your preconceptions rather well and not presume to much about others.
Re:
The Bible clearly contains some of the worst examples of humanity I expose myself to or allow my kids to read about. Take king David, for example, had I written this book, he would certainly have been disqualified. Granted no one is perfect, but lots of people are more moral-acting than him. I would have cleaned up and clarified a lot of other stuff too.
I see the Bible teaching morality through many other passages. The amoral parts complicate that, but I don't see that they disqualify it. The amoral parts are just the reality of humanity and are part of revealing the teaching of God's patience and grace, but also his judgement.
I think the extended discussion of the definitions of atheist and agnostic are interesting, and if I were to adopt the more subtle, slippery, squirrel-y ones, I would say I am an agnostic Christian, but just to talk straight, I would say I am a Christian who doesn't' know everything.
Thanks Jay, it's interesting to hear your perspective.
I felt from my readings of the Bible that a lot of the amorality came from God himself -- for instance, punishing the innocent daughters of 'offenders' in the most heinous ways possible. The punishment for a cheating man (being cast out) is very different for a cheating woman (stoned to death).
For me, it's really difficult to reconcile the kind, benevolent, all knowing God with the one written about in the Bible who bestows the most cruel and unfair punishments for what we would consider to be minor transgressions. That's why I tend to try to separate the two, and assume the Bible is man made and God himself -- if he exists -- must be very different.
I think a lot of the issues from the Old Testament were corrected in the New Testament, when Jesus is introduced and is a lot more like how we would expect a Christian to be today.
I would consider myself an atheist who doesn't know everything