To Dr. Tzounopoulos. Awareness won't help anyone. A pill to ease the loudness will.
Hi vermillion, putting the money towards awareness isn't an option.
To Dr. Tzounopoulos. Awareness won't help anyone. A pill to ease the loudness will.
The second thing you mentioned falls in line with what David Stockdale said which is currently a voting option. However, I highly doubt that the people you mentioned would submit for 4K which is why we've got to think clever about our plans, or try and raise more money. I will set up a poll in the coming hours and will likely let it run for a couple of weeks. We will then let donors vote on what they would prefer to happen and we will do as the majority wish. If for some reason an idea becomes unfeasible, for whatever reason, we will default to the second most popular option. There is obviously some due diligence involved once we know what path the majority want to take.
@Ed209
Perhaps, we should also consider Professor Berthold Langguth, who leads the research of tinnitus in the clinic Neuromod.
He will also be one of the speakers at the Tinnitus Expo.
https://www.neuromoddevices.com
By giving the funds to an university would be like throwing our previous glass of water into a beautiful green swimming pool that is already filled with water. Harvard University just as one has 34 billion in endowment funds and has an allocated medical research fund of 1.5 billion.Hi Greg, do you propose we remove the Universities as a voting option?
By giving the funds to an university would be like throwing our previous glass of water into a beautiful green swimming pool that is already filled with water. Harvard University just as one has 34 billion in endowment funds and has an allocated medical research fund of 1.5 billion.
Any university or corporate successful treatment does not have to be accepted by healthcare unless it's an approved FDA or European Union drug. If a successful treatment is government funded then it has to be accepted by Medicare, therefore hospitals and doctor will usually provide it for all.
I have an idea that will possibly not fly with others here. Hire a highly professional fund raiser with our funds and they would be able to 100X more dollars. They would be able to connect with the super powerful rich and corporate that we are unable to do. Then have a health giving agency manage the funds and buy needed mouth guard and such for those with tinnitus who can't afford them.
That is true. I once had exposure to this from a previous health employer. Granted the cause was never tinnitus, but we were able to hire a few successful fund raisers that raised a ton of money for families who had a special needs child. I think that you are right as tinnitus for some reason doesn't carry significance.It's not quite as straight forward as that, Greg. It would be difficult to raise funds even with a professional fundraiser otherwise tinnitus charities would be rolling in money already.
I wonder what stops people?
I think that some of us know a few rich people but feel that it would be awkward to ask them.
@valeri thank you for donating toward's Danny's fund. So sorry that you lost your job.Now that I can see the money will go to research I have donated to Danny's fund.
Sorry it's not much but that's all I can afford considering my financial situation after a job loss.
Greg this is a brilliant idea!I have an idea that will possibly not fly with others here. Hire a highly professional fund raiser with our funds and they would be able to 100X more dollars. They would be able to connect with the super powerful rich and corporate that we are unable to do. Then have a non profit health giving agency manage the funds and buy needed mouth guards and such for those with tinnitus who can't afford them.
It would be awesome if $2.5 mil was raised for tinnitus community in a year!BTA and Tinnitus Hub are masters at surveying the tinnitus population. Do they have any insights into that question based on previous work?
A professional fundraiser will take a percentage of what is raised. 5 years ago our church did a campaign to raise 5 million dollars to build a school and do some major repairs to the church. Church leadership hired a professional fundraiser from an agency that specialized in non-profits. The agency's fee was 10% of what was raised, plus expenses.
Sorry to get off topic,
TC
PS As far as the effectiveness goes- the professional was only able to raise half of the goal over the course of 1 year. So that meant 10% in fees plus close to $100,000 in expenses. Ouch!
Greg this is a brilliant idea!
I fully support this!
It would be much better use of a small amount we have!
t would be awesome if $2.5 mil was raised for tinnitus community in a year!
It would be truly awesome!
Couple of things to keep in mind- In the instance of the church, the money didn't come in all at once, rather the amount someone pledged could be paid over a 5 year period. For example, if I pledged to pay $5,000, I could pay $1,000 a year for the next 5 years. Well, circumstances change and people are not always able to meet their obligation 5 years out so you can really only count on receiving about 80% of the amount pledged. This in a church where membership is pretty stable and community spirit is strong. I imagine the percentage might be lower in other populations. So, if you do the math, $2.5Million yielded about $1.6Million too be paid to the church over a 5 year period. One other thing you should know, one person pledged $1Million- guess whose name is on the new school building!
TC
It would be awesome if $2.5 mil was raised for tinnitus community in a year!
It would be truly awesome!
I agree on both accounts but we have to be realistic.
Right. I think we need to look at the big picture. BTA and ATA are the registered charities/nonprofits. That will get them resources and into fundraising programs that individuals can't access.
Actually Ed, I know you are frustrated with the amount that's been raised for Danny's fund, but I don't think its that bad at all. Are you familiar with Michael Haar? He was a musician, took his life a couple of years ago and his family and friends in the NY area did a walk to raise money for the ATA. They raised $6,000 US. They are making it an annual thing, the next one is coming up soon https://www.eventbrite.com/e/second-annual-silence-was-stol… . It will be interesting to see if there will be an increase in the amount they raise.
Danny's fund is at 4,000 GBP , that's about $5,100 US- not that far from what the Haar's raised. Keep in mind, they probably have expenses to cover while you have little to none I assume. And yes, you worked hard, it was like banging your head on the wall BUT you won't do that again, so call it the price of an education!
Question- will you be able to access the people who visited the GoFundMe page and left a message or donated or both? Maybe we could do a little email survey to find out where they learned about the page, why they did or did not donate, why they did or did not leave a message, was GoFundMe easy to use, etc. Maybe we can learn from and cultivate what you started and keep brainstorming other ideas.
TC
And yes, you worked hard, it was like banging your head on the wall BUT you won't do that again, so call it the price of an education!
I did a lot of research to see what people can pull in based on the number of shares and views, and we aren't doing very good if I'm being honest. At one point we had so many views and shares that we were trending on the front page of GoFundMe, but all of these views haven't converted very well.
There can be a lot of conversion problems, and I don't know what data points you have for each stage of the funnel, but my gut feeling is that tinnitus simply isn't perceived as a big deal. It's sad but I think it's fundamental. If the conversion rate is poor but you have lots of entities at the beginning of the funnel, it means you did a great job to bring them there, but nothing is tickling the empathy cord enough to have them pull the trigger.
Unsurprisingly, it mimics what we hear from doctors ("you'll get used to it", "you won't notice it soon", "it gets better", etc), and what we hear from friends/family who just see us live our lives as if nothing happened. Lots of talks about "management techniques" make it sound like you have a way to manage your condition, like a diabetic manages his/her condition with insulin shots and goes on with his/her life.
I don't want to rehash what has been expressed thousands of times on this very forum, but the mere fact that tinnitus is only severe in a small fraction of the cases makes it hard to gather empathy around the global "tinnitus cause". A different word that dissociates the severe sufferers from the "run of the mill tinnitus" (no offense intended - I'm happy for those who fall in that category, and quite jealous too) is needed in my opinion. I wouldn't expect a campaign to find a "cure for moles and skin tags" to pull in as much as a campaign to "cure skin cancer".
To be honest, what we need is a cure for "MegaTinnitus". If we started calling it that way we'd - at the very least - trigger some curiosity, the stepping stone to awareness.
We are cursed by the fact that most tinnitus cases are mild and thankfully don't impact the quality of life of the patient too much. Being associated with such a mild condition (that often resolves itself naturally) is hampering the efforts done over many directions, including fundraising.
@Ed209,
I would give my right arm for a cure for everyone even if it was not a cure for myself.
I always think - do what you can for others as one day you could be the one needing help... It's something I truly believe in.
love glynis
I would have donated at my first view of Danny's fund. But, because of the set up through PayPal I did not do so even though they had the "donate as a guest of PayPal". Too much personal information made me hesitate. When I raised the issue my concerns were not really taken seriously.For Danny's fund, one of the major Tinnitus Charities didn't want to lift a finger to help, and yet, those are the routes we should be taking first. That kind of shocked me really, but maybe it shouldn't have. I tried to cover all the logical ideas but it really has been significantly harder than any other charity related work I've ever done in my life. I did a lot of research to see what people can pull in based on the number of shares and views, and we aren't doing very good if I'm being honest. At one point we had so many views and shares that we were trending on the front page of GoFundMe, but all of these views haven't converted very well. Again, I don't want to come across negatively here (that's not my intention); it's just educational to know this I suppose. It helps us to see the bigger picture and what we're up against and what other Tinnitus Charities are up against. However, I would like to thank all donors from the bottom of my heart. You people are the real deal.
This is very true. It's true at the church where I am treasurer. We had a someone to do just what you describe, he knew everyone personally. It was very effective.Donors are simply forgotten over time by Tinnitus Charities like the ATA. Organizations need a person to keep in contact with these people. A simple monthly hello and thank you for the past donation and not asking for more but sharing how the fund helped the organization.
Again, very true. Hear this over and over again. When there is a community, people need to feel connected and appreciated.Someone should be in charge of thanking the donors monthly and giving up dates as to what is happening without asking for more money.
I would have donated at my first view of Danny's fund. But, because of the set up through PayPal I did not do so even though they had the "donate as a guest of PayPal". Too much personal information made me hesitate.