DIY Low-Level Laser Therapy for Tinnitus on a Budget — LLLT Under 100,-

I received my power meter and took some readings. The meter went out of range (40mW/cm2 max) with the IR and Red light flush. So I used the following procedure to estimate it:
1. I took a reading that was in range.
2. Measured the projected circle (engineering paper came in handy for this).
3. Used the above to calculate the total light energy coming from the flashlight.
4. Extrapolated to a 2cm circle (flashlight flush).

I have uploaded a spreadsheet, but here is the summary:
14500 Battery
IR 124 mW/cm2

Red
High 170 mW/cm2
Flash 90 mW/cm2
Low 60 mW/cm2

Do not take these measurements as precise, but they should be in the ballpark.
What is the "red light flush"? The red light man device? Also can you take measurement of the Ilauke using normal AA batteries? I thought you already found those 14500s burned your ears...
 
I purchased a 630nm version of the same flashlight, linked above. With the NIR version it burned after 2 days straight of 2 x 5 minute sessions. I have been experimenting with lower time (2 mins) and it seems to be fine. Not sure if it was the light or waste heat from the flashlight. Also, the red light version gets very warm (much more so than the NIR), even with the flash mode.
 
I purchased a 630nm version of the same flashlight, linked above. It burned after 2 days straight of 2 5 minute sessions. I have been experimenting with lower time (2 mins) and it seems to be fine. Not sure if it was the light or waste heat from the flashlight. Also, the red light version gets very warm (much more so than the NIR), even with the flash mode.
Interesting. is 630nm more effective than 850? different wavelengths target different parts of the cochlea according to some stuff I read (not sure if I have that right).

What about testings with regular AA battery. Everybody else using this is just using standard AA battery.
Thanks
 
Interesting. is 630nm more effective than 850? different wavelengths target different parts of the cochlea according to some stuff I read (not sure if I have that right).

What about testings with regular AA battery. Everybody else using this is just using standard AA battery.
Thanks
Hi guys. @stargazer, I second @SilverSpiral, it'd be really helpful to know how much power there is from a fresh AA battery. Thanks
 
Ok so it's a little over 24 hours since I did my third session with the torch and my T is spiking again. This is accompanied by my usual aural fullness, and then some...
 
Fourth Session 10/03:
5 min each ear
IR 850 3w torch using AA batteries
Wide Beam.
No change
It will take months or even years to start noticing some changes
Monitoring on a daily or weekly basis isn't going to indicate much
 
It will take months or even years to start noticing some changes
Monitoring on a daily or weekly basis isn't going to indicate much
Is 2 sessions a week the way to go? What protocols do the pro lasers etc advise? I'm not expecting instant results but I'd like to know I'm on the right track in tackling my hearing loss, H and T.
 
We don't know
This lamp is a bit weak maybe doing more is fine
 
I am doing 3x15 min in my right ear a week. (I have that other IR-850 that isn't the Ilauke. Was using a 1.2V NiMH rechargable. Now using a 1.5v Alkaline.)

I have had a few spikes 2 days after using the light two separate times.. Not sure if related. But they have been bigger spikes than normal.

I will continue!


Anybody using regular AA batteries know about how long we can use the light before we should change the battery? Any guesses?
Use a battery tester?
 
guys - perhaps it makes sense to start a google doc to track changes instead of posting here each time? To Bobby's point - chronic tinnitus may require years of subtle changes for this to work even if successful. Perhaps it makes sense to post your protocol and then provide monthly updates?
 
Wilden always says that it takes 3 to 4 years to get to the final healing stage - lets assume 40 months being the average period it takes

At this rate we are getting maybe 10% improvements every 4 months..too little, too slow to even notice much so many people just give up after a few months.


I am back using the lucky laser at 808nm, 450mw pulsed 10Hz, 10 minutes per ear and every day, and I must say I got some recent further improvements since a week ago, better highs, a further small reduction in T and less H.

The S sounds better now and the same music has a bit more treble to it, quite pleased so far
 
guys - perhaps it makes sense to start a google doc to track changes instead of posting here each time? To Bobby's point - chronic tinnitus may require years of subtle changes for this to work even if successful. Perhaps it makes sense to post your protocol and then provide monthly updates?
You're right :)
 
Wilden always says that it takes 3 to 4 years to get to the final healing stage - lets assume 40 months being the average period it takes

At this rate we are getting maybe 10% improvements every 4 months..too little, too slow to even notice much so many people just give up after a few months.


I am back using the lucky laser at 808nm, 450mw pulsed 10Hz, 10 minutes per ear and every day, and I must say I got some recent further improvements since a week ago, better highs, a further small reduction in T and less H.

The S sounds better now and the same music has a bit more treble to it, quite pleased so far
still using the flashlight?
 
I am still experimenting with angle. It looks like I found a more efficient (correct) angle. Tinnitis instantly goes up when I use the IR at this new angle. Also more fluctuations during the day (but this could have been a coincident). These fluctuations where not so profound using the other angle. I will see if this change is temporarily.
I think the biggest problem is not knowing if this angle is correct. Especially with the Lucky Laser. The beam is relatively narrow. (Which also makes it more efficient).
I am using 300 mW at 10 Hz (808 nm). Higher output is not comfortable for my ears.
 
Wilden always says that it takes 3 to 4 years to get to the final healing stage - lets assume 40 months being the average period it takes

At this rate we are getting maybe 10% improvements every 4 months..too little, too slow to even notice much so many people just give up after a few months.


I am back using the lucky laser at 808nm, 450mw pulsed 10Hz, 10 minutes per ear and every day, and I must say I got some recent further improvements since a week ago, better highs, a further small reduction in T and less H.

The S sounds better now and the same music has a bit more treble to it, quite pleased so far
After all this talk of LEDs you are back to using laser?
 
After all this talk of LEDs you are back to using laser?

this lamp is nowhere near the advertised 5w of optical power, we need to find a much more powerful one. I tried the 3.7v battery but mine cuts the beam out so...

I always said that high power is key for this treatment to work, that's why Wilden uses 20w

the lucky laser has the 808nm but its a narrow beam at max 0.9w - if you try this at a 5cm distance from the ear to get a wider coverage you clearly feel a heat deep into the ear something I did not notice with that LED lamp

Until we find a "real" 5w or more optical device I will use the lucky

Of course the cheapest way is just to buy the 10w or 20w or more LED part and make your own device which is also an option I consider...since I have the power source now with that 3.7v battery
 
this lamp is nowhere near the advertised 5w of optical power, we need to find a much more powerful one. I tried the 3.7v battery but mine cuts the beam out so...

I always said that high power is key for this treatment to work, that's why Wilden uses 20w

the lucky laser has the 808nm but its a narrow beam at max 900 if you try this at a 5cm distance you clealry feel a heat deep into the ear something I did not notice with that lamp

Until we find a "real" 5w or more optical device I will use the lucky

Of course the cheapest way is just to buy the 10w or 20w LED and make your own device which is also an option I consider.
So with your view of the LED lamps being underpowered, those of us that bought these devices, do you think we are safe to use them daily for extended periods of time if they are "underpowered"? the approaches foncky and blue are taking with the ilauke is pretty conservative isnt it?
 
I think its safe yes you won't melt your head with it for sure
 
... Of course the cheapest way is just to buy the 10w or 20w or more LED part and make your own device which is also an option I consider...since I have the power source now with that 3.7v battery

you then can pick your prefererred frequence and power. With the lucky laser you also reintroduce pulsing.I had a nice improvement but after I switched pulsing off the progress stopped. Might have to do with it
 
image.png
Does anyone know of a decent online hearing test to gauge hearing improvement by. My last audiogram was over 7 months ago.
I use the MiMi hearing test and as Lymebite pointed out it has been somewhat buggy since the update.

What I do is this, I do the MiMi audiogram and when I'm finished that I use another high frequency tone generator app to test the higher frequencies(see pic)and note how high the volume must be before I can hear that tone starting on the lowest volume.
 
Over on the Facebook LLLT group they are discussing Professor Hamblin's interview with Dr. Mercola and his suggestion that people buy low-cost IR devices on Amazon. They call this "biohacking" - that is, buying an inexpensive IR device designed for nighttime illumination (like our torches) and then using it for LLLT.

For example, here are two examples in the $10 or $20 range that are mentioned (not for tinnitus but for other purposes):

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00L8VKYB0

https://www.amazon.co.uk/niceEshop-Night-Vision-Infrared-Illuminator/dp/B019ESMPAQ

But most of the people over there doing "biohacking" seem to have purchased solar power meters (like @stargazer did) to test the power output of these devices (in terms of mW / cm 2 at different distances). There seem to be many brands and models of solar power meters and can be bought for as low as $100 range.

(The Facebook group is for LLLT in general, there is not any tinnitus discussion.)

Here is the Dr. Hamblin interview for anyone interested.

 
@stargazer Are you still doing daily treatments with the 14500 battery. @Bobby B what was the rationale for 2 treatments a week? Would the best results come from treatments everyday or every other day. Intuitively it seems that every 3-4 days would be unnecessarily long. Your body would probably be finished with the effects at 24 and ready for another session. That said you'd want the dosing not too high for daily treatments. Would a 60J/cm2 dose be too much for daily use? At 200mW/cm2 that would be around 5 min per ear. If 60 J/cm2 is too much than maybe 30 J/cm2 every day would be better than 60 J/cm2 every 3 days.
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now