What "stats" are we talking about? Where do they come from?
It never ceases to amaze me how myopic even the most advanced research tends to be. "Oh, 10 patients (as opposed to 1 million) reported yadda yadda yadda...so this thing is/is not statistically significant." Of course, when money is involved, that may be intentional myopia. But the same goes for medical practitioners who see one thing a few times and use it as a blanket assumption for the rest of the patients they encounter. I suppose it's human nature. I know that I personally have been using individual anecdotes from the Success Stories forum to give myself hope. "If it happened for X, it can happen for me."
Governments do it, too. And we allow it. "Some dumbass out of millions of citizens over hundreds of years did dumb thing Y so now we need this law to make sure it doesn't happen again." Or legislator Z has some unfounded belief about whatnot due to his or her personal experience and introduces legislation aimed at the most narrow of situations.
We're all on here because we'd prefer not to have this condition. And I'd even venture that most of us are, like I mentioned, looking through these threads for evidence of someone saying something that we can use to equate ourselves to them and transitively to their success or failure in this process.
In my own work, I have seen this "one and done" design pattern over and over. People get hold of a set of data, pick out the first observation and design the whole system around that one observation. The most glaring result is moronically de-normalized data stores that prevent any sort of abstraction necessary for the gleaning of "meaning".
The difference between what we refer to today as data mining or data science or whatever monikers we've come to embrace in the past maybe decade or so and good old fashion statistics is structure. Computers and digital globalization have allowed us to persist vast amounts of verbosity, seemingly uncoupled from any sort of numerical form. It has become the job of the data scientist to uncover this form in order to present structures that can be analyzed traditionally.
Marketers send out surveys begging for participation, whereas a population with a vested interest in the results provides a much more willing subset of responses.
I've seen such a suggestion in these forums before but have seen no evidence of materialization. Correct me if I'm wrong. From a population, from instances are derived abstractions from which meaning may be inferred. Things that anyone can measure or report offer the potential for a first layer of abstraction. I can weigh myself but can't give you a blood cell count. Why not use a support forum as a portal for willing participants to provide readily analyzable data? Words and stories make us feel better and sometimes worse, but numbers are more meaningful when it comes to breaking down a problem. I'm going to take a guess and say that most of us on here don't have the background to support us talking with any real authority about cilia and ototoxicity and nerve damage. Just a hunch. But I bet most of us can, with some degree of accuracy, report, say for example, the number of hours of sleep we get per night. Or whether we live in the city or the countryside or the suburbs. Whether we smoke or not. Numbers, enumerations, booleans. Wouldn't it be nice to read an abstract that didn't start with, "In a study of a dozen participants, ten of whom were completely fucked, the other two being only moderately fucked..."?
So, how many people are on here? Hundreds? Thousands?
Just as an off-the-top-of-the-head example, not for official use
...
{
Physical Attributes
Height
Weight
Age
Gender
Orientation
...
Biological Processes
Hours Sleep Per Night
Hours Per Day On A Computer
Hours Per Day Using Headphones
...
Tinnitus
Cause - Noise, drug, ...
Type - Hissing, Whooshing, Tonal, ...
History - Static, Changed, ...
Perceived Level
...
Consumption
Food - Protein, Green Leafy, Carbs
Drink - Water, Tea, Coffee, Soda
...
Background
Education Level
Habitat
Type Of Work Or Daily Activity - Office, Manual Labor, ...
...
Medical Background
Average Number Of Doctor Visits Per Year
Mood Disorders - Anxiety, Eating, OCD, ...
Physical Disorders - Hypertension, Asthma, ...
Sight - No Issues, Nearsighted, Farsighted
Briggs Meyers Personality Type
...
Medications, Supplements, Other
Medications and Supplements - Past
Medications and Supplements - Present
Recreational Drugs - Past
Recreational Drugs - Present
*** A million other things ***
}
I know I'm being way too optimistic here.