I don't know .
I suppose the results are tempoorary but for me works better than RTG.
To me corticosteroids > benzos > flupirtine > RTG
Find me someone who will make a definite assesment of microvascular compression and I would surely do a mvd surgery. My MRI shows signs of mvc, but an acoustic trauma trigered most of my T! I say most because it was there before, not to that extend though... In my case, it is a dead end. Nobody can diagnose cohlea damage, nobody can be sure whether the microvascular pressure causes T, nobody dare do anything!Only drastic solution today is surgery if found a treatable cause.
right so you think @attheedgeofscience is a victim of scams?Stem cells lasers and other like these treatments are scams.
Find me someone who will make a definite assesment of microvascular compression and I would surely do a mvd surgery. My MRI shows signs of mvc
Yes but because he reports improvement placebo worked for him.right so you think @attheedgeofscience is a victim of scams?
@skoupidis as @NiNyu said, I had MVD surgery less than two weeks ago. It has decreased my T by 70-80%. It was a necessary surgery, because I had an artery that was just hammering my cochleovestibular nerve causing damage. I had sudden onset pulsitile tinnitus for a bit over a year, at a level that I called a screaming 10. I understand there is about a four-year window for this surgery to be successful. It looks like you are well within this timeframe. Other things go along with this surgery that are hard work, like learning to walk again, working on your VOR, and rebalancing your brain/vestibular system. I still have double vision upon awakening, but it is going away, as I work on rebalancing my brain. The only neurosurgeons that you want to do this surgery are ones that will not do it unless they have a positive diagnosis of MVC, and from talking with my team of neurosurgeons this condition is very rare. It is brain surgery. Mine was diagnosed by a neuro radiologist in a Neuroscience Institute. You want to have a very competent neuro radiologist. Feel free to PM me if you would like more information.
Ok, if doctors suggest it after thorough examinations I would. Doctors in my country aren't helping at all!@skoupidis if you mri shows mvc and T is a life problem for you go for surgery...
Not sure why 9 members rated the quoted post "informative" when there are several passages that are wrong (and which would have been easy to verify - for anyone...). See this literature if in doubt:Flupirtine acts mainly on the Kv7.3 , retigabine specifically acts on the neuronally expressed KCNQ2-KCNQ5 (Kv7.2-Kv7.5) channels, AUT00063 will act on the Kv3 channels.
Retigabine is a so-called "dirty-drug" (= wide spectrum MoA). It works very well in relation to tinnitus for a certain sub-set of tinnitus patients. While a dirty drug may carry more side effects than a selective one, what matters is not the selectivity, but the potency.Despite a drug being potassium channel openers, it has to be very precise to work.
Flupirtine acts on the same sub-units (Kv7.2-5) as Retigabine. So, yes, there is a possible impact.Flupirtine doesn't act on any sub unit related to T. ( So no possible impact)
Hi, your are quoting a post from last summer which was actually moved here from another thread. At that point tinnitustalk wasn't familiar with potassium channels and KvX.Y modulators so the post you are quoting is one of the first "translations" of scientific research publications/articles and it has some flaws but now we know better. Good reminder anyway.Not sure why 9 members rated the quoted post "informative" when there are several passages that are wrong (and which would have been easy to verify - for anyone...). See this literature if in doubt:
http://bps.conference-services.net/resources/344/3046/pdf/EPHAR2012_0621.pdf
Retigabine is a so-called "dirty-drug" (= wide spectrum MoA). It works very well in relation to tinnitus for a certain sub-set of tinnitus patients. While a dirty drug may carry more side effects than a selective one, what matters is not the selectivity, but the potency.
Flupirtine acts on the same sub-units (Kv7.2-5) as Retigabine. So, yes, there is a possible impact.
a (concerned) passerby
Not sure why 9 members rated the quoted post "informative" when there are several passages that are wrong (and which would have been easy to verify - for anyone...). See this literature if in doubt:
http://bps.conference-services.net/resources/344/3046/pdf/EPHAR2012_0621.pdf
Retigabine is a so-called "dirty-drug" (= wide spectrum MoA). It works very well in relation to tinnitus for a certain sub-set of tinnitus patients. While a dirty drug may carry more side effects than a selective one, what matters is not the selectivity, but the potency.
Flupirtine acts on the same sub-units (Kv7.2-5) as Retigabine. So, yes, there is a possible impact.
a (concerned) passerby
Only 200mg / day were used in the study. Which is 1/3 of the maximum dose. The study proves nothing (except that Flupirtine is not effective at those doses....).The use of flupirtine in treatment of tinnitus.
Salembier L1, De Ridder D, Van de Heyning PH.
Author information
Abstract
CONCLUSION:
Flupirtine, a functional NMDA antagonist, does not seem to be efficacious in the treatment of tinnitus.
OBJECTIVES:
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether flupirtine has any beneficial effect on tinnitus perception.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Twenty-four patients were selected (6 female and 18 male patients) with continuous subjective tinnitus. Eight patients suffered left-sided tinnitus, 4 right-sided tinnitus and 12 bilateral tinnitus. We assessed the burden of the tinnitus by loudness visual analogue scale (VAS) and tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) according to Hallam et al., and Hiller and Goebel. All patients were treated with a 2 x 100 mg daily dosage of oral flupirtine for 3 weeks in an open prospective design.
RESULTS:
There was no statistical effect on VAS and TQ of the treatment with flupirtine. Only one patient (4.2%) experienced a positive effect on the tinnitus but discontinued the treatment because of amnesia and concentration disorders.
Only 200mg / day were used in the study. Which is 1/3 of the maximum dose. The study proves nothing (except that Flupirtine is not effective at those doses....).
a (concerned) passerby
True. But that - liver toxicity - would have been known in advance of the study (and hence is besides the point). If a drug is going to be studied for specific purpose (i.e. symptom treatment) dosage needs to be considered. Otherwise, there is not much point in doing the study in the first place (at least in this case).The most serious side effect is frequent hepatotoxicity which prompted regulatory agencies to issue several warnings and restrictions....Not an ideal drug to use.
True. But that - liver toxicity - would have been known in advance of the study (and hence is besides the point). If a drug is going to be studied for specific purpose (i.e. symptom treatment) dosage needs to be considered. Otherwise, there is not much point in doing the study in the first place (at least in this case).
a (concerned) passerby.
If you are a healthy adult with no excessive alcohol or hepatoxic drug use, you should be fine to take Flupirtine over 3-4 weeks 600Mg per day.
Flupirtine is widely used (by millions of people). There is 15 liver related cases per 100.000 people which isn't much imo.
When used right and liver enzymes are observed, I'd say Flupirtine is more safe than Retigabine with less side effects. Treatment cycles just should be kept short (1 month for example). This is why I actually tried to get Flupirtine but my GP couldn't get it for me because Flupirtine isn't sold in Finland.
@Danny Boy , little off-topic, but you mentioned earlier in another thread that Keppra lowered some ppls T. Who are they and where are their statements? I'm asking because I'm interested trying Keppra before Retigabine.
Well that was kind of the problem. Didn't find any.https://www.tinnitustalk.com/threads/levetiracetam-keppra-worked-for-my-hyperacusis.8946/
Some people on here, read though. And Viking of course and his doctor trialled it on patients and got good results.
Well that was kind of the problem. Didn't find any.
Well I took only 10mins to eye it through so I may have missed them.Hm, there was some people? I swear there was.
Well I took only 10mins to eye it through so I may have missed them.