It's not but it could be viewed as implied.Do we know if participants in phase 1 had tinnitus? Is it mentioned somewhere?
It's not but it could be viewed as implied.Do we know if participants in phase 1 had tinnitus? Is it mentioned somewhere?
Yes. Watch the Q and A. Everyone should watch the JP Morgan presentation and the Q and A. In the Q and A, they were asked about tinnitus and saw positive trends.Do we know if participants in phase 1 had tinnitus? Is it mentioned somewhere?
They don't mention it but the likelihood of having tinnitus while having hearing loss is quite high so I expect a few patients would have tinnitus and hearing loss.Do we know if participants in phase 1 had tinnitus? Is it mentioned somewhere?
It will help your OHC loss from mild presbyacusis. If you have IHC it will help too if over 3500Hz. If you have synaptopathy also in areas without the hair cell loss this drug won't help that aspect. Unfortunately no diagnostic test can tell you if that's the case. You will just have to decide if you want to try the drug and see.Will FX-322 help me?
"A normal audiogram with the hint of a slight treble reduction. Image closest to presbyacusis of mild kind. Average 16 dB air conduction bilaterally."
I didn't know support cells could deplete in the cochlea. That's concerning. Do you have a source I could read?I'm going to repost my speculation from the Woodcock thread because it's more relevant here. These are my legitimate thoughts that I hope will assuage the worries of many tinnitus sufferers. @Candy
I truly think this drug holds more promise for treating tinnitus than it does hearing loss for a few reasons:
1. The participants who were administered the drug in phase 1 had more significant hearing loss (25-60dB @ 250Hz-8kHz) than do most tinnitus-sufferers. This would suggest:
2. The drug better penetrates the base of the cochlea where HF- and UHF-associated HC's are located.
- They probably had more support-cell depletion than people with little-to-no hearing loss.
- They likely experienced improvement in the untested frequencies above 8kHz where I believe the comparatively more intrusive/troubling tinnitus resides.
3. A gel would not discriminate against treating the untested notches of which I believe all tinnitus is composed. I believe the reason why tinnitus sufferers have difficulty matching the exact notch wherein the bulk of their tinnitus resides is because tinnitus is a composite of many untested regions of hearing loss. The bulk of my "loss" is at 16kHz, where there is a 25dB difference in pure tone audiometry between my R & L ear, so 16kHz is my dominant tone; however, when I try to sleep I can better hear the little nuances in the sound of my tinnitus—untested damage of HC's corresponding to 11kHz, 13,455kHz., etc. Indiscriminately sweeping all of these areas with the gel solution should correct the HC's that its surface area contacts.
They were asked specifically about tinnitus in the Q and A and they said they saw "trends" in both the mild and moderate/severe groups. Trends implied positive to me or it would be listed as an adverse reaction and not included in the experimental arm of phase 2.They don't mention it but the likelihood of having tinnitus while having hearing loss is quite high so I expect a few patients would have tinnitus and hearing loss.
They can be, particularly with some ototoxins but with enough noise induced hearing damage they are lost too. Keep in mind that only LGR+ support cells (one specific type) are needed for regeneration and since FX-322 duplicates them before hair cell generation you shouldn't have further depletion.I didn't know support cells could deplete in the cochlea. That's concerning. Do you have a source I could read?
So the supporting cells are essentially scars?In regards to epithelial scarring:
Cochlear pathology, sensory cell death and regeneration
https://academic.oup.com/bmb/article/63/1/25/377504
Contains a section on:
Cell elimination and scar formation
"... The term 'scar' is used to describe replacement of the original cell type (hair cell) by a 'filling' cell, a supporting cell. The use of the term scar in the organ of Corti is justified because the scar is permanent. The immediate role of the scarring process is to prevent fluid mixing. ..."
Scar tissue picture shown in a Stanford University presentation on hearing loss:
View attachment 36142
There are several a few pages back here. It's more of a concern for people with significant hearing loss or damage from ototoxic substances. @HootOwl offered a really good response to my concerns like maybe 1 page back.I didn't know support cells could deplete in the cochlea. That's concerning. Do you have a source I could read?
GOOD NEWS.In regards to epithelial scarring:
Cochlear pathology, sensory cell death and regeneration
https://academic.oup.com/bmb/article/63/1/25/377504
Contains a section on:
Cell elimination and scar formation
"... The term 'scar' is used to describe replacement of the original cell type (hair cell) by a 'filling' cell, a supporting cell. The use of the term scar in the organ of Corti is justified because the scar is permanent. The immediate role of the scarring process is to prevent fluid mixing. ..."
Scar tissue picture shown in a Stanford University presentation on hearing loss:
View attachment 36142
Here I go again with my noob questions, sorry in advance.In regards to epithelial scarring:
Cochlear pathology, sensory cell death and regeneration
https://academic.oup.com/bmb/article/63/1/25/377504
Contains a section on:
Cell elimination and scar formation
"... The term 'scar' is used to describe replacement of the original cell type (hair cell) by a 'filling' cell, a supporting cell. The use of the term scar in the organ of Corti is justified because the scar is permanent. The immediate role of the scarring process is to prevent fluid mixing. ..."
Scar tissue picture shown in a Stanford University presentation on hearing loss:
View attachment 36142
There are several a few pages back here. It's more of a concern for people with significant hearing loss or damage from ototoxic substances. @HootOwl offered a really good response to my concerns like maybe 1 page back.
GOOD NEWS.
Yeah, is this epithelial scarring an issue? When you said "GOOD NEWS" @mrbrightside614, was that sarcasm, or did you actually mean it? Just wondering.Here I go again with my noob questions, sorry in advance.
So does this scarring prevent new hair cells from regrowing?
äThey were asked specifically about tinnitus in the Q and A and they said they saw "trends" in both the mild and moderate/severe groups. Trends implied positive to me or it would be listed as an adverse reaction and not included in the experimental arm of phase 2.
Lol I was just reading that paper today too.In regards to epithelial scarring:
Cochlear pathology, sensory cell death and regeneration
https://academic.oup.com/bmb/article/63/1/25/377504
Contains a section on:
Cell elimination and scar formation
"... The term 'scar' is used to describe replacement of the original cell type (hair cell) by a 'filling' cell, a supporting cell. The use of the term scar in the organ of Corti is justified because the scar is permanent. The immediate role of the scarring process is to prevent fluid mixing. ..."
Scar tissue picture shown in a Stanford University presentation on hearing loss:
View attachment 36142
Total speculation but it could just be to update their knowledge after initiating coverage on Oct. 28 ("JPMorgan analyst Anupam Rama initiated coverage of Frequency Therapeutics with an Overweight rating and $25 price target. The analyst believes early data for FX-322 set the stage for potentially addressing a "large untapped" hearing loss market"). This doesn't necessarily mean JPMorgan will soon say anything new one way or other.This says Frequency Therapeutics met with JP Morgan on the 13th:
https://thefly.com/landingPageNews....Therapeutics-management-to-meet-with-JPMorgan
Anyone want to speculate why?
Well in the cochlear implant studies, over time the people who improved did so whether the device was on or off so it seems to be related to actual improvement and not masking.ä
Assume someone with hearing loss and tinnitus. If this drug improves hearing but has no effect on tinnitus, it could still seem like the person's tinnitus has improved because of his better hearing. They really need to find a way to objectively judge whether tinnitus improves.
I think they're due to release their 4th Quarter 2019 Financial Results soon. They released their 3rd quarter results on November 18th, last year. So I would imagine it's no coincidence that this meeting is occurred a week before the 4th quarter results. However, the only reason I can imagine that they'd want to talk to JPMorgan is because they want some money for something, but what? I know they have the Multiple Sclerosis program in the works, maybe they've found their drug and want to get started early? Or maybe they've come up with some additional areas they want to study but they don't have the financial strength to go after everything they want to, so they need an injection of cash.This says Frequency Therapeutics met with JP Morgan on the 13th:
https://thefly.com/landingPageNews....Therapeutics-management-to-meet-with-JPMorgan
Anyone want to speculate why?
As a corollary to this. A few pages ago, I think @Diesel articulated it best:Transcription:
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/thread...cs-—-hearing-loss-regeneration.18889/page-216
Audience:
Besides the word score in phase 1/2, did you look at any other secondary end-points that would give you any indication of <inaudible>?
Christopher Robert Loose (Chief Scientific Officer):
The question is, are there any other secondary end-points? So in addition to the word recognition score, which is a test in a quiet background. We also saw improvements in word-in-noise, which is basically repeating that test in a restaurant type of environment, where there are 6 people talking in the background, in a you know much more challenging environment. We saw similar improvers, improvements in that space. We also tested the loudness, test, the pure tone types of test there. We noticed that a number of patients with the biggest losses had improvements in the higher frequencies which is were the greatest amount of drug is present and people have the most loss. So moving forward we are going to be continuing with those three end-points, but we will also be adding ultra high frequencies going forward cause we know that's where the drug is concentrated, as well as quality-of-life, tinnitus and other end-points that we're thinking could give us a full picture of what this medication may potentially do.
Audience:
Just as a follow-up on that. Did you see any improvement in the secondary end-points in the mild hearing loss category?
Christopher Robert Loose (Chief Scientific Officer):
We saw trends across the population.
I wouldn't make any conclusions on this statement, but it's very good news that they added tinnitus as a secondary end point. We will see in September 2020 if it does anything in regards to tinnitus induced by hair cell loss. At the moment it's still speculation if it will help or not.
No matter the outcome in regards to tinnitus, this will still be a very important moment in the history of tinnitus. Even if it does nothing for tinnitus. All those years of speculating what the physiological cause is of tinnitus. There are so many theories even within the spectrum of hearing. We will finally get to know if regenerating hair cells (to some degree) impacts tinnitus or not. If we see serious audiogram improvements in the treated regions and we see tinnitus reduction we will finally know that hair cell loss is the main driver behind tinnitus (due to hearing loss). If tinnitus is not reduced at all, we will understand that it is more likely that it's loss of synapses or auditory nerve damage that causes tinnitus. This will be a significant improvement in the field of tinnitus research.
It would a *terrible* idea on Frequency's part to add it to phase 2a if they didn't see improvement in phase 1.I suspect that since tinnitus is being assessed as a secondary outcome in the Phase 2A, they probably already have some indication that it may reduce it. They don't have concrete data that can be verified with the FDA since they didn't assess tinnitus upfront in the Phase 1/2. However, any notes, for example, from the staff monitoring treatment or the the patients themselves may have indicated that tinnitus improved in some way.
I was surprised that tinnitus would be measured in a Phase 2 and not a Phase 3 given how subjective patient feedback is on the symptoms.
I recall a lawyer once saying, "don't ask an open question if you don't already know what the answer will be." I believe this may be the case for the tinnitus survey in the P2A.
No, this is actually great news. The verbiage is dumb as hell IMO (BS in exercise physiology). The fact that support cell formation directly proceeds hair cell loss is very encouraging that the support cell will be in place to appropriately differentiate into a hair cell, post-inoculation.Yeah, is this epithelial scarring an issue? When you said "GOOD NEWS" @mrbrightside614, was that sarcasm, or did you actually mean it? Just wondering.
It's not out of the ordinary for equity researchers from larger investment/financial firms to want to meet with execs of a firms to understand the business and product in greater detail; especially when they just had an IPO.This says Frequency Therapeutics met with JP Morgan on the 13th:
https://thefly.com/landingPageNews....Therapeutics-management-to-meet-with-JPMorgan
Anyone want to speculate why?
Is management usually involved in those meetings? The notice specifically said management.Total speculation but it could just be to update their knowledge after initiating coverage on Oct. 28 ("JPMorgan analyst Anupam Rama initiated coverage of Frequency Therapeutics with an Overweight rating and $25 price target. The analyst believes early data for FX-322 set the stage for potentially addressing a "large untapped" hearing loss market"). This doesn't necessarily mean JPMorgan will soon say anything new one way or other.
Auditory nerve damage? Aw ffs, isn't the Hough Pill only addressing that kind of damage? Jesus, so much can go wrong with the auditory system...Transcription:
https://www.tinnitustalk.com/thread...cs-—-hearing-loss-regeneration.18889/page-216
Audience:
Besides the word score in phase 1/2, did you look at any other secondary end-points that would give you any indication of <inaudible>?
Christopher Robert Loose (Chief Scientific Officer):
The question is, are there any other secondary end-points? So in addition to the word recognition score, which is a test in a quiet background. We also saw improvements in word-in-noise, which is basically repeating that test in a restaurant type of environment, where there are 6 people talking in the background, in a you know much more challenging environment. We saw similar improvers, improvements in that space. We also tested the loudness, test, the pure tone types of test there. We noticed that a number of patients with the biggest losses had improvements in the higher frequencies which is were the greatest amount of drug is present and people have the most loss. So moving forward we are going to be continuing with those three end-points, but we will also be adding ultra high frequencies going forward cause we know that's where the drug is concentrated, as well as quality-of-life, tinnitus and other end-points that we're thinking could give us a full picture of what this medication may potentially do.
Audience:
Just as a follow-up on that. Did you see any improvement in the secondary end-points in the mild hearing loss category?
Christopher Robert Loose (Chief Scientific Officer):
We saw trends across the population.
I wouldn't make any conclusions on this statement, but it's very good news that they added tinnitus as a secondary end point. We will see in September 2020 if it does anything in regards to tinnitus induced by hair cell loss. At the moment it's still speculation if it will help or not.
No matter the outcome in regards to tinnitus, this will still be a very important moment in the history of tinnitus. Even if it does nothing for tinnitus. All those years of speculating what the physiological cause is of tinnitus. There are so many theories even within the spectrum of hearing. We will finally get to know if regenerating hair cells (to some degree) impacts tinnitus or not. If we see serious audiogram improvements in the treated regions and we see tinnitus reduction we will finally know that hair cell loss is the main driver behind tinnitus (due to hearing loss). If tinnitus is not reduced at all, we will understand that it is more likely that it's loss of synapses or auditory nerve damage that causes tinnitus. This will be a significant improvement in the field of tinnitus research.
Could it be as simple as additional funding for the expanded trial? I believe they are estimating filing their MS IND 2H2021 which would make it quite early but i guess they could need pre-clinical funding. Very strange but, i agree, the Q4 conference call and financial release should clear some of that up.I think they're due to release their 4th Quarter 2019 Financial Results soon. They released their 3rd quarter results on November 18th, last year. So I would imagine it's no coincidence that this meeting is occurred a week before the 4th quarter results. However, the only reason I can imagine that they'd want to talk to JPMorgan is because they want some money for something, but what? I know they have the Multiple Sclerosis program in the works, maybe they've found their drug and want to get started early? Or maybe they've come up with some additional areas they want to study but they don't have the financial strength to go after everything they want to, so they need an injection of cash.
My guess is we'll find out when they release the 4th quarter results (which I thought would happen today, but maybe it's delayed?). Though then again, if they didn't get what they wanted at the meeting, maybe we won't find out.
It's definitely peculiar though.
It's possible they could be going to JP Morgan for capital but the fact that Astellas financed them for $80m upfront and $525m as they face "commercial milestones" should be everything they need, even considering their new hiring for a superior gel formulation. Astellas Pharma is flush with cash, $11B in straight revenue in 2013.I think they're due to release their 4th Quarter 2019 Financial Results soon. They released their 3rd quarter results on November 18th, last year. So I would imagine it's no coincidence that this meeting is occurred a week before the 4th quarter results. However, the only reason I can imagine that they'd want to talk to JPMorgan is because they want some money for something, but what? I know they have the Multiple Sclerosis program in the works, maybe they've found their drug and want to get started early? Or maybe they've come up with some additional areas they want to study but they don't have the financial strength to go after everything they want to, so they need an injection of cash.
My guess is we'll find out when they release the 4th quarter results (which I thought would happen today, but maybe it's delayed?). Though then again, if they didn't get what they wanted at the meeting, maybe we won't find out.
It's definitely peculiar though.
Didn't realize this. That makes perfect sense.It's not out of the ordinary for equity researchers from larger investment/financial firms to want to meet with execs of a firms to understand the business and product in greater detail; especially when they just had an IPO.
JPM had them at overweight for a while now, probably wants to include them in a SMID or biotech type fund.
Dan from Pipeline told me that their regenerated OHCs go into normal alignment when I asked him. They have a gamma secretase inhibitor, which is more like Audion but not as potent or support cell depleting.I cannot tell with absolute certainty from that text if the epithelial scarring would affect hair cell regeneration, but the text confirms my earlier statement that supporting cells move in place where the hair cell is lost.
Looking at the images of noise induced damage for example does reveal malformations (scar tissue) in the epithelium.
I've also seen many images where the alignment (organisation and positioning) of remaining hair cells is no longer perfect after damage.
Even if hair cells are regenerated, they may not be perfectly organised as they were before any damage happened.
Further analysis should be done.
I hear what you're saying and both of you could be right, but at the moment I don't want to draw any speculative conclusions beyond the actual facts. This might create high expectations amongst some people here who don't look at the actual statement done by Chris Loose. Some people could be crushed if it turns out to be ineffective.As a corollary to this. A few pages ago, I think @Diesel articulated it best:
It would a *terrible* idea on Frequency's part to add it to phase 2a if they didn't see improvement in phase 1.