Frequency Therapeutics — Hearing Loss Regeneration

Any chance if they make it to the final Phase 3 that they would lower or change their inclusion criteria? I know FX-322 focuses on the extended super-high frequencies (10,000 to 20,000 Hz) and I figure an extended audiogram would suffice, but they preferred volunteers with mild to severe hearing loss in the regularly tested 500 - 4000 Hz range where I assume the compound doesn't reach. Of course, I'm not going to DARE jeopardize the results of the trial if I'm not a good candidate.

I'm actually shocked about the performance of FX-322 with word recognition since most speech timbre falls below 10,000 Hz. This gives me huge hope for FX-345.

View attachment 51797
If the Phase 2B produces positive results, they'll most likely stick with the trial design in Phase 3. They're more focused on word score deficit, than high frequency audiograms. Most likely, it seems as though differentiation of certain syllables (fricatives) that exist well above 8 kHz improves with cell regrowth by FX-322. This is probably what translates to improved word scores.
 
Any chance if they make it to the final Phase 3 that they would lower or change their inclusion criteria? I know FX-322 focuses on the extended super-high frequencies (10,000 to 20,000 Hz) and I figure an extended audiogram would suffice, but they preferred volunteers with mild to severe hearing loss in the regularly tested 500 - 4000 Hz range where I assume the compound doesn't reach. Of course, I'm not going to DARE jeopardize the results of the trial if I'm not a good candidate.

I'm actually shocked about the performance of FX-322 with word recognition since most speech timbre falls below 10,000 Hz. This gives me huge hope for FX-345.

View attachment 51797
In the first trial with FX-322, I think it was 3-4 patients that had improvements in their audiogram at the highest frequency that was tested, which was 8 kHz. Imagine if they tested up to 16-20 kHz. There would have been more patients with improvements in their audiogram.

I hope that their Phase 2b trial shows more patients with improvements in their audiograms. I know a lot of people in this thread were saying that this drug does nothing to help improve audiograms but that was because they only tested up to 8 kHz in the Phase 1 trial.
 
If they get to the point of releasing FX-322 on the market, does that mean anyone could try it even if you aren't in the target group they're trialing it in currently? For example, my hearing loss is likely genetic but I had good hearing as a child so something has obviously degraded over the years so could I choose to just try FX-322? Or will doctors only prescribe it for what they tested on and had positive results?
 
If they get to the point of releasing FX-322 on the market, does that mean anyone could try it even if you aren't in the target group they're trialing it in currently? For example, my hearing loss is likely genetic but I had good hearing as a child so something has obviously degraded over the years so could I choose to just try FX-322? Or will doctors only prescribe it for what they tested on and had positive results?
That's something I want to know too. I only saw unapproved drugs via the FDA's official website for Compassionate Use/Extended Access which is annoying since my GP chuckled at me when he looked at my audiogram. If it hits the market, how would I even get access to it...

You may actually qualify depending on your standard audiogram (125 Hz to 8000 Hz) to be a part of the trial. I assume they are still actively recruiting for the Phase 2b trial, but the last update was from two months ago. Depending on where you live or are willing to drive to, they have many openings at various locations. Sadly, they don't accept "healthy" volunteers and you must meet the below criteria.

Inclusion Criteria: Sign a consent form, be between 18-65yo, audiogram showing HL, being able to talk with people about experiences with the drug, contraceptives, and whatever the last requirement means. The exclusion criteria is even more complex. Take a look below to see if you are interested:

FX-322 in Adults With Acquired Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Their secondary outcome measures do show an extended high frequency audiogram testing and a tinnitus assessment which isn't part of the inclusion criteria; I wish it was. Maybe I'll reach out to their trialing inquiries email about it: ClinicalTrialsInformation@FrequencyTx.com
 
Should have results in Q1/2023 then. Would be such a disaster if it fails. This drug is the biggest hope for many people here. We're all well used to these drugs failing though.
If this fails, I feel like this is not only for FX-322 but also for FX-345 as well. If FX-322 can't show any improvements in its current delivery method, I don't expect FX-345 to do anything either.

Let's hope that more participants still show the same success as in their earlier trials.
 
Having gone through the evaluation process for participation in December last year (and failing to meet the criteria), I can say it was extremely rigorous (probably why it took so long to fill the trial). As a result, I do think they've done everything possible to give it every chance for success. If it were to fail, I think it'll be due to lack of efficacy rather than trial design.
 
Having gone through the evaluation process for participation in December last year (and failing to meet the criteria), I can say it was extremely rigorous (probably why it took so long to fill the trial). As a result, I do think they've done everything possible to give it every chance for success. If it were to fail, I think it'll be due to lack of efficacy rather than trial design.
If the results were accurate in the earlier trials they had success in, then FX-322 Phase 2b trial shouldn't fail unless the more participants they have added in this trial easily shows the drug not being effective.

By the end of February-March we will know if Frequency Therapeutics can continue with their hearing regeneration drugs. If this is trial is a fail, their only drug in the pipeline is for MS.
 
Could FX-322 potentially aid someone like me with mild hearing loss at worst?

I've noticed I've lost a little bit of sensitivity to my hearing. I unfortunately won't be able to participate in the trial as I don't posses the loss in hearing needed to be included, so I really hope this makes it to market (as we all do of course).
 
Could FX-322 potentially aid someone like me with mild hearing loss at worst?

I've noticed I've lost a little bit of sensitivity to my hearing. I unfortunately won't be able to participate in the trial as I don't posses the loss in hearing needed to be included, so I really hope this makes it to market (as we all do of course).
Yes, you will see improvement, but not to the extent of those with moderate, moderately-severe, severe, and profound hearing loss since they have more to gain. Even me, who doesn't have much hearing loss would gain much from the extended frequencies since that's what makes up a good chunk of my tinnitus in my left ear.

This targets both OHC and IHC so you will see hearing threshold improvement and improved definition of sound (they used a word recognition test). Their Phase 2 testing ends January 6, 2023 so we should hear results early next year. NCT05086276 on ClinicalTrials.gov website.

I enjoy reading the "historical changes" for the trial where you can see them change details about the trial. They moved back from October 2022 to January 2023 and had added more test subjects (142 instead of 124, maybe a transposition error lol).

upload_2022-10-31_9-6-37.png
 
Do you think that a hypothetical compound, that could reach even lower frequencies, could help with low-frequency hearing loss associated with cochlear hydrops ("no-vertigo Ménière's")? I understand this is completely speculative, but I'm curious.
 
I truthfully don't know how FX-322 couldn't possibly make it to market. The results speak for themselves. They've proven that it's an efficacious product, and people's lives have been changed by it. In my opinion, the reason only 33% (approx.) had a meaningful improvement is because the other 77% had lower frequency damage, synaptopathy, or another type of damage.

For noise-induced SNHL, this seems like a real winner.

I also feel as if that multiple doses spread apart roughly two or so months could provide an additional benefit compared to one dose. The multi-dose trial maybe overloaded the ear since the treatments were administered in short time frames.
 
The way these drugs are going, I won't believe anything until it's released to the public and is working. The Otonomy trials have made no sense whatsoever with promising results, followed by nothing, and I fear this is going to be the case with Frequency Therapeutics as well.

A couple of years ago the Research News section was quite promising but now there's really not a lot left. Even if Frequency Therapeutics is successful, then there is zero evidence so far that it does anything for tinnitus or other hearing conditions.

I really hope my pessimism is unfounded and the start of 2023 brings in positive news from the FX-322 trials and also real evidence - not anecdotal - that it has some impact on tinnitus. I believe tinnitus is still being assessed in the current trial?
 
The way these drugs are going, I won't believe anything until it's released to the public and is working. The Otonomy trials have made no sense whatsoever with promising results, followed by nothing, and I fear this is going to be the case with Frequency Therapeutics as well.

A couple of years ago the Research News section was quite promising but now there's really not a lot left. Even if Frequency Therapeutics is successful, then there is zero evidence so far that it does anything for tinnitus or other hearing conditions.

I really hope my pessimism is unfounded and the start of 2023 brings in positive news from the FX-322 trials and also real evidence - not anecdotal - that it has some impact on tinnitus. I believe tinnitus is still being assessed in the current trial?
I'm like you @ColinUK. Maybe it's our no bullshit, conservative down to earth nature in Britain. Of course I hope FX-322 works but after seeing 40-45% of participants in Phase 1 trials experience clinically significant improvements for OTO-313 and OTO-413, and subsequently fail, I hold out no faith in FX-322.

I've said this before, once you take it to a bigger trial with more participants, it weeds out any slight improvement and struggles to raise its head over placebo.

Even a successful Phase 2 trial would need to do much more than limp over the line to get through a larger Phase 3. This has limped and limped through Phase 1/2 trials numerous times and then stalled on a failure, only to be resurrected.

And I've also said before, I think technology will win the race over biology in hearing restoration.
 
The way these drugs are going, I won't believe anything until it's released to the public and is working. The Otonomy trials have made no sense whatsoever with promising results, followed by nothing, and I fear this is going to be the case with Frequency Therapeutics as well.

A couple of years ago the Research News section was quite promising but now there's really not a lot left. Even if Frequency Therapeutics is successful, then there is zero evidence so far that it does anything for tinnitus or other hearing conditions.

I really hope my pessimism is unfounded and the start of 2023 brings in positive news from the FX-322 trials and also real evidence - not anecdotal - that it has some impact on tinnitus. I believe tinnitus is still being assessed in the current trial?
It seems they care more about speech recognition but tinnitus is listed as a secondary outcome measure. They are only looking at 25 self-reported answers instead of asking the full 142 enrollees, I assume more than 25 in the trial have tinnitus though so I don't get that.

I know FX-322 only targets the 20,000 Hz to 10,000 Hz range band so I'm hoping that most subjects have high frequency tinnitus and we can get some proper results regarding it.

upload_2022-11-3_8-39-26.png


upload_2022-11-3_8-39-40.png
 
Not trying to get anyone's hopes up but the stock market appears to be optimistic about FREQ stock...
I wouldn't read to much into the stock price. It was over $50 at one point before the poor results. People always end up making money whether this stuff works or not, if they are smart (rules me out unfortunately). I got a few stocks when it was around the $1.40 mark so I really hope it works for my ears and wallet's sake, but I think the reality is next year my ears will still be hurting and ringing and my fortune won't be improved, but fingers crossed for a double win.

I so hope my gut feeling is wrong.
 
I wouldn't read to much into the stock price. It was over $50 at one point before the poor results. People always end up making money whether this stuff works or not, if they are smart (rules me out unfortunately). I got a few stocks when it was around the $1.40 mark so I really hope it works for my ears and wallet's sake, but I think the reality is next year my ears will still be hurting and ringing and my fortune won't be improved, but fingers crossed for a double win.

I so hope my gut feeling is wrong.
I hope so too, although I agree with your statement. Having too much faith in FX-322 (or any other potential treatment) just sets us up for major disappointment. The market is driven by profit, not necessarily by results. At the same time, one can't help but hope...
 
Does anyone know what "mid-stage readout" the article is referring to? Is it the readout planned for Q1 2023, or something before that?
Mid-stage refers to the fact that it is Phase 2 which is considered the middle phase. It is referencing the readout we are waiting for in Q1 of 2023.
 
This has limped and limped through Phase 1/2 trials numerous times and then stalled on a failure, only to be resurrected.
Let me fix that for you "This has progressed through trials set by the FDA that are designed for safety/determining cohorts." The only trial that was actually a failure is the current one. Like Chad has continuously reminded people, there is a fundamental difference between the purpose of the current study vs. the earlier trials
I've said this before, once you take it to a bigger trial with more participants, it weeds out any slight improvement and struggles to raise its head over placebo.
Could you please provide us with your reasoning to why you believe this is the case? Specifically in regards to the differences between the Phase 2a and 2b study as the number of participants is just one of the changes to the study design.
 
If you plan for the worst, then you'll never be disappointed...

There is nothing wrong with that line of thought. We are all emotionally invested in this FX-322 drug; to some extent anyway.
 
We are all emotionally invested in this FX-322 drug; to some extent anyway.
We all are not lmao. My tinnitus, for example, is purely neurological. Fixing hair cells won't fix a neurological condition.

If you want to fix tinnitus, it's either through a really strong medication or brain stimulation/implant.
 
My tinnitus, for example, is purely neurological
For some time now I've been circling around the idea that all tinnitus is neurological; something like the lack of an expressed gene for example within the brain's filtering circuits upstream of the cochlear.

Fixing the lesion downstream may ameliorate tinnitus in some patients but I don't think it'll be a fix for all or the majority. To get to that point we need to be focusing on those filtering circuits in my opinion.
 
For some time now I've been circling around the idea that all tinnitus is neurological; something like the lack of an expressed gene for example within the brain's filtering circuits upstream of the cochlear.

Fixing the lesion downstream may ameliorate tinnitus in some patients but I don't think it'll be a fix for all or the majority. To get to that point we need to be focusing on those filtering circuits in my opinion.
How about a gene therapy that regulates all hyper-excitable circuits?

Gene therapy targeting overactive brain cells could treat neurological disorders
 
How about a gene therapy that regulates all hyper-excitable circuits?

Gene therapy targeting overactive brain cells could treat neurological disorders
Thanks for this, it's a very interesting announcement. I won't derail this thread but in brief, the thing I've found fascinating along the way is something called, Transmembrane Potential, i.e. the electrical voltage across every human cell.

Below optimum operating voltage causes human cells to become dysfunctional, which I hypothesise could be a causal link to tinnitus if this dysfunction occurs in the brain's auditory filtering circuits.

Us tinnitus sufferers being born with 'faulty components' in those filtering circuits is the only rationale I've ever been able to concoct that would explain why some people with hearing damage get tinnitus while others don't. A genetic fix for that would be groundbreaking.

Thanks again for the link, it'll be useful when I eventually muddle together something a bit longer that I want to write for another thread.
 
How about a gene therapy that regulates all hyper-excitable circuits?

Gene therapy targeting overactive brain cells could treat neurological disorders
This article specifically mentions gene therapy and potassium channels to modulate and calm over-active cells. There is already something that calms over-active cells using the potassium channel and it's called XEN1101.

Will somebody, anybody, for the love of Zeus, get their hands on some XEN1101. I tried but got shot down.
 
For some time now I've been circling around the idea that all tinnitus is neurological; something like the lack of an expressed gene for example within the brain's filtering circuits upstream of the cochlear.

Fixing the lesion downstream may ameliorate tinnitus in some patients but I don't think it'll be a fix for all or the majority. To get to that point we need to be focusing on those filtering circuits in my opinion.
Only thing that describes tinnitus is thalamocortical dysrhythmia and hyperexcitability of different brain areas. The best approach would be some brain implant/stimulation or targeted meds.

You'd have to watch some of Prof. Dirk De Ridder's lectures about tinnitus.
 
Will somebody, anybody, for the love of Zeus, get their hands on some XEN-1101. I tried but got shot down.
If we're lucky, it's about 1-3 years from what I heard until XEN1101 would become available.

Hopefully sooner rather than later.
 

Log in or register to get the full forum benefits!

Register

Register on Tinnitus Talk for free!

Register Now