@ZFire, that is exactly right. And this will be the case for at least 10 years, probably 15-20 years.So in conclusion, hearing aids and cochlear implants (?) are still the best way to treat hearing loss. Is this about right?
@ZFire, that is exactly right. And this will be the case for at least 10 years, probably 15-20 years.So in conclusion, hearing aids and cochlear implants (?) are still the best way to treat hearing loss. Is this about right?
@d'Wooluf, I agree. What's your audiogram like?I saw an audiologist back in December who told me that a cochlear implant might be the next step for me. There are lots of things you can have valid anxieties about with cochlear implants. But along with all of them there was this other thought in the back of my mind. What if I do the cochlear implant and it then turns out that FX-322 actually works? I'd had serious doubts about FX-322 for a long time but the dream of being able to hear 'normally' is hard to let go of.
Anyway, no more illusions. I've been freed up a bit in the last few days. Now to deal with the reality of the situation.
Close to profound at the higher frequencies. There's been a big drop off from 1 kHz up over the last few years, so heading south inexorably. Word recognition scores were poor as well which I think is just as important for cochlear implant evaluation. I haven't got the results to hand, sorry.@d'Wooluf, I agree. What's your audiogram like?
I just forced myself to go and watch that CBS report. The thing is, they were telling people right to their face that Frequency Therapeutics is already under investigation and being sued by investors.The bullishness of some people on here despite the results of the last trial was something to behold. I'm sorry for all those who got burned twice.
Management has been shown to be completely untrustworthy and incompetent. Glad I sold most of my position last year - I'm actually embarrassed I still retained a small % of shares.
Lucchino should be investigated for fraud, pumping the stock on national television weeks before the readout. They are laughing all the way to the bank and deserve every single lawsuit coming their way.
I pity any MS patients who will hold out the same hope we did.
The weird thing about the teacher is that the time between the damage and the injection sounded to be rather long. People don't normally spontaneously get their hearing back a long time after sudden hearing loss. People can sometimes get it a month after, but a year is rather unheard of.I just forced myself to go and watch that CBS report. The thing is, they were telling people right to their face that Frequency Therapeutics is already under investigation and being sued by investors.
But by pulling this teacher guy out, the physician who injected him commenting that FX-322 must be the cause of his recovery, and then Lucchino's comments about, hey just watch the (yet to be announced) data, I'm in no doubt that this was a carefully constructed report to pump their stock price.
Whether or not those who are suing can prove criminal intent remains to be seen. But there's, in your face, then there's, in yer f*ckin' face. I'm actually shocked.
The entrepreneur appearing on the scene is a welcome addition for most of us -- after all, academia produce these reams and reams of learned research reports that either haven't or don't seem to have cured much in the tinnitus field.I just forced myself to go and watch that CBS report. The thing is, they were telling people right to their face that Frequency Therapeutics is already under investigation and being sued by investors.
But by pulling this teacher guy out, the physician who injected him commenting that FX-322 must be the cause of his recovery, and then Lucchino's comments about, hey just watch the (yet to be announced) data, I'm in no doubt that this was a carefully constructed report to pump their stock price.
Whether or not those who are suing can prove criminal intent remains to be seen. But there's, in your face, then there's, in yer f*ckin' face. I'm actually shocked.
It's difficult to tell whether it's sloppy reporting or intentional chicanery but CBS incorporated the strapline, "Sudden Deafness" into their report. They then went on to talk about waking up "losing your hearing" before going straight into interviewing this teacher guy who doesn't describe sudden deafness at all. What he describes is hearing distortion. Everything sounded 'robotic', he says.People don't normally spontaneously get their hearing back a long time after sudden hearing loss.
We actually don't, not in humans. We only know the drug gets in the cochlea (they did two studies on this with patients who were about to be implanted with a cochlear implant). My guess is the drug doesn't stay in the cochlea long and deep enough to elicit a response. We know from studies on intratympanic dexamethasone injections that intratympanic injections are very unpredictable. That, or the drug doesn't work at all.We know FX-322 regrows outer hair cells. It's just that a hearing signal didn't return. Is it possible that the synapses didn't reconnect? This would be contrary to that old Stanford video which said they reconnect "like magic." I wonder if any group is out there thinking about an FX-322 and OTO-413 cocktail.
I hope not as both drugs failed miserably and didn't do jack. Why waste time flogging a dead horse.I wonder if any group is out there thinking about an FX-322 and OTO-413 cocktail.
I thought it had something to do with a combination of tinnitus and no longer having the clarity that comes with diverse frequencies. Almost like comparing cheap audio equipment to studio quality. I actually have that unpleasant sensation with my unilateral hearing loss. I also attributed it to some hidden hearing loss.It's difficult to tell whether it's sloppy reporting or intentional chicanery but CBS incorporated the strapline, "Sudden Deafness" into their report. They then went on to talk about waking up "losing your hearing" before going straight into interviewing this teacher guy who doesn't describe sudden deafness at all. What he describes is hearing distortion. Everything sounded 'robotic', he says.
Without context that distinction could be quite benign but considering what's just happened, it's raised more than a touch of doubt in my own mind. Anyhow, life and science goes on like you say.
I had sudden hearing loss. At first voices sounded robotic after onset. They returned to normal sounds.It's difficult to tell whether it's sloppy reporting or intentional chicanery but CBS incorporated the strapline, "Sudden Deafness" into their report. They then went on to talk about waking up "losing your hearing" before going straight into interviewing this teacher guy who doesn't describe sudden deafness at all. What he describes is hearing distortion. Everything sounded 'robotic', he says.
Without context that distinction could be quite benign but considering what's just happened, it's raised more than a touch of doubt in my own mind. Anyhow, life and science goes on like you say.
Whoa whoa, when was this proven? The Phase 2b trial tested for EHF improvement, yet the announcement this week reported no improvement in secondary outcomes (in which EHF audiogram testing was included).FX-322 was only able to regenerate the ultra high frequencies. That is, those that are outside what is considered to be crucial for human voice frequencies, which makes it a lot harder to argue that it would be beneficial for the majority of people, besides musicians, unless it actually did improve clarity for word recognition. It's outside of the needs of most people.
What do you mean? Like, your brain adapted after?I had sudden hearing loss. At first voices sounded robotic after onset. They returned to normal sounds.
Well, it happened in my left ear and at first everything in that ear sounded robotic. Now it just sounds like I heave hearing loss. I can't hear birds chirping or women's voices clearly in my left ear.What do you mean? Like, your brain adapted after?
Bad phrasing I suppose. I meant that "it was intended to." I've had a really busy day, so I rushed that on my smartphone. Sorry lol.Whoa whoa, when was this proven? The Phase 2b trial tested for EHF improvement, yet the announcement this week reported no improvement in secondary outcomes (in which EHF audiogram testing was included).
If the drug showed efficacy in any capacity (even in improved EHF hearing thresholds), I believe that would be enough to continue developing the drug, and certainly enough to excite development of FX-345. I believe Frequency Therapeutics knows there is a market of patients who would love improvement in their ultra high frequency hearing; many here report that they have tinnitus in such frequencies, and EHF hearing loss is by far the most prevalent presentation of hearing loss.
Right, no proof IN humans but it did regenerate hair cells ex vivo human tissue in a lab. And the drug made it into the cochlea. Did it regenerate in vivo? We do not have proof it did but there's good reason to suspect it did. But no hearing was regenerated. Perhaps the synapses didn't reconnect. Which is why I bring up the hidden hearing loss drug. Maybe they would work together and they failed alone. But I'm just pondering...We actually don't, not in humans. We only know the drug gets in the cochlea (they did two studies on this with patients who were about to be implanted with a cochlear implant). My guess is the drug doesn't stay in the cochlea long and deep enough to elicit a response. We know from studies on intratympanic dexamethasone injections that intratympanic injections are very unpredictable. That, or the drug doesn't work at all.
Mixing both solutions might not be a good idea but maybe dose FX-322 first, then wait a month or two before dosing OTO-413 would have been a better solution.Right, no proof IN humans but it did regenerate hair cells ex vivo human tissue in a lab. And the drug made it into the cochlea. Did it regenerate in vivo? We do not have proof it did but there's good reason to suspect it did. But no hearing was regenerated. Perhaps the synapses didn't reconnect. Which is why I bring up the hidden hearing loss drug. Maybe they would work together and they failed alone. But I'm just pondering...
I know you're one of the biggest advocates here for the absolute need of reliable outcome measures in this field and rightfully so. How many times do we have to go through these initial 'promising' results phases, only for it to never amount to anything in the end before we get the memo? A 'BS detector' (love the term) is sorely needed.Hard agree. This is the bar as far as I'm concerned. My gut feeling is that their work on objective tinnitus measurement is so important it should form the basis of our manifesto going forward.
They're not that far away from their system being capable enough to be used in clinical trials as a measure and monitoring tool.
The moment we have this, we'll have the biggest BS detector working for us night and day on our side of the research industry. Can't come soon enough.
Weird. I had the robotic voices too, but no sudden hearing loss or measurable hearing loss that followed. I do think distortions is a hearing issue though. There was a time where my distorted hearing made music extremely difficult to comprehend. It came across as unintelligible.I had sudden hearing loss. At first voices sounded robotic after onset. They returned to normal sounds.
This does seem like logical thinking.Mixing both solutions might not be a good idea but maybe dose FX-322 first, then wait a month or two before dosing OTO-413 would have been a better solution.
Sounds like the distortion was diplacusis! You're lucky it eventually resolved, though I'm sorry the hearing loss remained.Well, it happened in my left ear and at first everything in that ear sounded robotic. Now it just sounds like I heave hearing loss. I can't hear birds chirping or women's voices clearly in my left ear.
Yes but lab findings don't always translate into real life findings. It would be interesting to study temporal bones of patients who participated in an FX-322 trial and got the drug. I think the lack of results has more to do with not regenerating (enough) hair cells than something that has gone awry with the regeneration process.Right, no proof IN humans but it did regenerate hair cells ex vivo human tissue in a lab. And the drug made it into the cochlea. Did it regenerate in vivo? We do not have proof it did but there's good reason to suspect it did. But no hearing was regenerated. Perhaps the synapses didn't reconnect. Which is why I bring up the hidden hearing loss drug. Maybe they would work together and they failed alone. But I'm just pondering...
Is your hearing loss in both ears or just one? I have been told I have a case for being a cochlear implant candidate for my left ear (basically severe-profound across the board on that one). My right ear is normal with just a 25 dB dip at 4 kHz at worst, which is why I have not bothered considering a cochlear implant and just lived with hearing out of one ear.Close to profound at the higher frequencies. There's been a big drop off from 1 kHz up over the last few years, so heading south inexorably. Word recognition scores were poor as well which I think is just as important for cochlear implant evaluation. I haven't got the results to hand, sorry.
cochlear implants are schizo robboto type mecha stuff thatll cost you more than you can affordSo in conclusion, hearing aids and cochlear implants (?) are still the best way to treat hearing loss. Is this about right?
Both. I can just function in quiet with hearing aids. I can't function in noise at all. I've got every reason to at least get evaluated but I'm procrastinating. Everyone tells me they've come a long way in the last few years.Is your hearing loss in both ears or just one?