They said results will be posted on the 30th of April but that's why I said May.Is it not April or did they postpone it till May?
They said results will be posted on the 30th of April but that's why I said May.Is it not April or did they postpone it till May?
Honestly, I can't see the NHS rushing to get this to people. But, boy, do I hope I'm wrong.And lol I think I'll need a double dose of FX-322 and talking therapy - I'll probably still have a lingering fear of noise haunting me forever lmao.
Interesting speculations about the cost - I wonder how long it would take to become available under a system like the NHS in the UK. Although I would probably just fly out and pay for it anyway asap.
I'm going to fly out and pay - you only have one life. No point in suffering whilst waiting for the NHS drug procurement.And lol I think I'll need a double dose of FX-322 and talking therapy - I'll probably still have a lingering fear of noise haunting me forever lmao.
Interesting speculations about the cost - I wonder how long it would take to become available under a system like the NHS in the UK. Although I would probably just fly out and pay for it anyway asap.
You bring up a good point about the maladaptive plasticity! The resilience and physical recovery of the inner ear is one thing (one BIG thing), but there are still plenty of other systems up the chain that could be left highly sensitive.I think that you will still have to be very, very careful. Remember that the underlying cause/predisposition to maladaptive plasticity in your brain that led to tinnitus in the first place isn't being fixed. Only the cochlear input. Whatever has gone wrong with regards to our gating mechanisms is still in place even after new hair cells/synapses are formed.
I so hope you are right. It will be a bummer if we all get better hearing but no change in tinnitus.The fact that people pop in a hearing aid and, poof—it's gone, indicate to me two things:
1) increased hearing inputs IN AND OF THEMSELVES (not in respect to correcting actual tinnitus) can be just as valuable reversing the actual tinnitus-associated deficiencies.
2) maladaptive plasticity's threat is over-emphasized. I do foresee a gradient of recovery rather than absolute, but the timeline wouldn't be equitable to the amount of time you'd had tinnitus.
@FGG has mentioned this before, but they said it's best to find an ENT specializing in Meniere's. They give these injections regularly and are generally very, very familiar with the process.Being pessimistic, is it possible, in any way, that our tinnitus could even get worse from this drug? Maybe the actual injection itself could worsen things?
I want your guy too LOL. As I will be coming from abroad, I wouldn't know where to start looking for someone.@FGG has mentioned this before, but they said it's best to find an ENT specializing in Meniere's. They give these injections regularly and are generally very, very familiar with the process.
I think that would reduce the already quite small amount of risk associated with the injection itself.
I already found my guy lol. My audiologist said he would get patients back after this ENT gave injections for SSHL and not see a single scar. He said he was always like "did you even get the injection?"
I wonder how quickly ENT doctors will get access to the drug and the training for that. I guess that would add further delay. I wonder if there is a way to find ENTs who are willing to take advantage of the fact that this is the first treatment for hair cell damage. Establishing themselves for a large customer base before others.@FGG has mentioned this before, but they said it's best to find an ENT specializing in Meniere's. They give these injections regularly and are generally very, very familiar with the process.
I think that would reduce the already quite small amount of risk associated with the injection itself.
I already found my guy lol. My audiologist said he would get patients back after this ENT gave injections for SSHL and not see a single scar. He said he was always like "did you even get the injection?"
That's a good question about access, and none of us really know. I imagine it will be up to each individual clinic whether or not to stock the compound, and like you said some will be more bullish than others in order to capitalize on returns.I wonder how quickly ENT doctors will get access to the drug and the training for that. I guess that would add further delay. I wonder if there is a way to find ENTs who are willing to take advantage of the fact that this is the first treatment for hair cell damage. Establishing themselves for a large customer base before others.
Haha, well if all goes well I will disclose the name of him and the clinic.I want your guy too LOL. As I will be coming from abroad, I wouldn't know where to start looking for someone.
Many if not most ENTs are not at all trained in IT injections. All Otologists are, however (ENT subspecialists). A "Meniere's specialist" ENT would be your best non-otologist bet as they do these very routinely.That's a good question about access, and none of us really know. I imagine it will be up to each individual clinic whether or not to stock the compound, and like you said some will be more bullish than others in order to capitalize on returns.
Training is not an issue. It's a standard injection - nothing else is needed. Convincing an ENT to do this off-label for tinnitus might be a larger hurdle, but hopefully the experimental arm will provide enough positive data to assuage any fears.
To quote @HootOwl "fuck, I'll eat crow if FX-322 makes anybody's tinnitus worse." I agree 100%—this is not even on my radar of concerns.Being pessimistic, is it possible, in any way, that our tinnitus could even get worse from this drug? Maybe the actual injection itself could worsen things?
I'm going to hold you down on that if it does lol.To quote @HootOwl "fuck, I'll eat crow if FX-322 makes anybody's tinnitus worse." I agree 100%—this is not even on my radar of concerns.
This is my thinking as well, and I actually hope it will be the case. Here in Canada the wait to see an ENT can be up to a year and you need a referral in the first place. If you were to go through healthcare then I imagine our doctors will look at who "needs" the drug based on a certain standard of audiometric thresholds (and hopefully tinnitus suffering) and those patients MAY qualify for it to be covered under our healthcare. Although I don't believe hearing aids are covered at all so perhaps this wont even be the case. I'm guessing the majority of us will have to pay, which I'm fine with doing as long as I can walk in and make an appointment without jumping through hoops and waiting.Truthfully, I can see "hearing regeneration only" clinics popping up quickly in response to demand the same way LASIK eye centers did.
Just curious - are you saying that if you agree to pay out of pocket, you could see an ENT tomorrow rather than wait a year, or you'd still have to wait even if you were paying?This is my thinking as well, and I actually hope it will be the case. Here in Canada the wait to see an ENT can be up to a year and you need a referral in the first place. If you were to go through healthcare then I imagine our doctors will look at who "needs" the drug based on a certain standard of audiometric thresholds (and hopefully tinnitus suffering) and those patients MAY qualify for it to be covered under our healthcare. Although I don't believe hearing aids are covered at all so perhaps this wont even be the case. I'm guessing the majority of us will have to pay, which I'm fine with doing as long as I can walk in and make an appointment without jumping through hoops and waiting.
I can't wait to see a whole menu of treatments. I'll take 2 shots of FX-322, PIPE-515, OTO-414, and a jar of Hough Pills to go, please.
When I first heard about injections I was apprehensive.Many if not most ENTs are not at all trained in IT injections. All Otologists are, however (ENT subspecialists). A "Meniere's specialist" ENT would be your best non-otologist bet as they do these very routinely.
Wow. That is crazy. Good ole Universal Health Care. I can see an ENT as soon as one week here in AZ without a referral. I had an IT injection of steroids within a week of my acoustic trauma.Here in Canada the wait to see an ENT can be up to a year and you need a referral in the first place.
Ah, gotcha! Yes, I agree that individual differences in predisposition, like the anecdotes you shared, might mean that some are more sensitive to further maladaptive plasticity.What remains is the question of how much of a predisposition to maladaptive plasticity will remain once treatment is rendered.
I would hope with the intervention of drugs like FX-322, those more sensitive to maladaptive plasticity would trend towards greater resilience against future maladaptive plasticity. Maybe rock concerts are off the list, but hopefully things like shouts and everyday noises wouldn't cause further problems. I wouldn't be first in line to test those limits on myself either though, haha .What remains is the question of how much of a predisposition to maladaptive plasticity will remain once treatment is rendered. There's virtually no research on it so it's anyones guess, but I'm erring on the side of caution and assuming that restoring cochlear input does not necessarily mean the predisposition is eliminated entirely.
I'm saying if I agreed to pay out of pocket it would have to be through a private regeneration clinic in the fashion of Lasik.Just curious - are you saying that if you agree to pay out of pocket, you could see an ENT tomorrow rather than wait a year, or you'd still have to wait even if you were paying?
To be fair, this is not the norm in the U.S.Wow. That is crazy. Good ole Universal Health Care. I can see an ENT as soon as one week here in AZ without a referral. I had an IT injection of steroids within a week of my acoustic trauma.
I was able to see an ENT within 5 days - in CA (would have been faster if the weekend wasn't there). He brushed me off completely and told me to come back in a month or two if it got worse literally chuckled and said a week is nothing.Wow. That is crazy. Good ole Universal Health Care. I can see an ENT as soon as one week here in AZ without a referral. I had an IT injection of steroids within a week of my acoustic trauma.
I had a 15 dB improvement at 8 kHz from audiogram pre IT to one week post IT. Tinnitus improved as well during that timeframe.How did your hearing loss/tinnitus respond?
Don't feel bad. That is the response people with tinnitus get from most ENTs.I was able to see an ENT within 5 days - in CA (would have been faster if the weekend wasn't there). He brushed me off completely and told me to come back in a month or two if it got worse literally chuckled and said a week is nothing.